Piratis
If you are talking about being elected as a member of the parliament or something similar, then with the garnteened proportional representation we will have the exact same chances of being elected. E.g the 100GC voters will elect 10 MPs and the 20TC voters will elect 2TC. So I I would have 10/100 chance of being elected and you would have 20/2 chance of being elected wich is the same thing.
Piratis I understand where you are comingfrom but the real issues doesnt lie in the number of MPS from each side it is the power they have. You can have 90GCs and only 10TCs but if 5TCs vote are required on every decision you can seee the influence the TCs will have. You can have 50GCs and 50TCs but deision cna be passed with 49 votes, do you see the difference?
If you are talking about presidential elections, again I would be more than glad if you are given guarantees for your proportional representation. For example every 5 terms of president 1 should be a TC.
So I will have 4/100 chance to be elected and you will have 1/20 chance, which is again the same.
So we have to wait 20 years for a TC president a lot can happen in that time, how you feel if you had to wait 20years for a president you can trust.
As you wouldn't accept a system that would give to me 60% more chances of being elected, I also would not accept a system that would give to you more chances of being elected. We should all have the same chances and those that get elected should have the save power regardless of the race they belong.
There has to be a balance that will ensure no domiantion of one community over the other.
Is this acceptable to you? Or something that is unfair to you (e.g. me having more chances to be elected) is not accepted, while something that is unfair to me it is?
The power alloted to each community is more important than the split of members in ruling body.
Maybe you had a peaceful time for the past 32 years, but we never had such thing for the last 500 years, since the time you arrived on our island. If you call the past of GCs a "disaster" then what can we say about the past of Turks on this island?? So stop to pretend to be the victim. You have absolutely no right to ask for the violation of our human and democratic rights, and it is totally idiotic from you if you expect that we will ever accept such thing.
When did we have the first opportunity to rule ourselves? thats what i referred to as a disaster.
18% is what you are. If 18% is not a minority, then having your 18% power share means that you do not have a minority power share but an equal power share.
The 18% maybe a numerical minority but dont forget we are equal partners and decision effecting our community negatively should be influenced by TCs.
1) To be assimilated in a country under purely GC rule where you will be discriminated against.
The answer to this is a clear NO and I don't understand how you can say "purley GC" when you will have 18% proportional representation, including 1 in every 5 presidents. How is that "purely GC"??? It is purely Cypriot, and you are 18% of Cypriots!
Also, with your religion, language etc official and protected there is no way you will be assimilated. And along with your proportional representation you will also have your veto powers on important issues, so you can not be discriminated either, even if we wanted to do that.
If the başance is in favor of GCs 8 to 2 and they only need 6 votes to get decision through then I call that a GC state run by GCs and we TCs are just tokens to make up the numbers and falsely display to the world that TCs are not excluded from the running of their own country.
"we want to be able to control our own destiny"
You live in Cyprus which belongs to all Cypriots and you are 18% of Cypriots. If you want to control your own destiny alone do it, but Cyprus belongs to you only by 18% and with that 18% you can not control it. Get it?
Can we not control to the extent to protect our community from the 82% majority taking decsions on oue behalf that would have a negative impact on us? is this really asking for to much?