Piratis
Again, the control will be proportional to population and all citizens will be equal. Each GC will have the same control as each TC. The control of Cyprus will be to Cypriots. Just like the control of USA belongs to USA citizens, and not to blacks, whites and Hispanics separately.
You are talking about individual rights, not community rights. You have 60% more chance of being elected than me due the fact that you are GC, surely this is unfiar balance in your favor that will insure we TCs dont get a look into the running of our country.
The "car" as you said will define the rules, which are democracy, human rights and the EU laws. Cyprus will have to follow a specific path, it can not turn to something different (e.g communism).
The car can be a Ford = human rights and democracy this we agree on.
Within this limits you will have to accept that the way Cyprus is "driven" will depend on the population as a whole. You can not demand that the 18% (actually the 9.1%) should be able to stop the Cyprus "car" from moving just because it feels like, if the car is moving within the limits of human rights, democracy and EU laws. If the car tries to move out of these limits, then yes, you will have the veto power to stop it.
Arent you contradicting yourself by saying that we can stop the car then you say we cannot, who will determine when we can stop the car and how will we do it if the driver is a GC? beg?
Serbia and Montenegro are two separate countries. So your model for Cyprus is the one of two separate countries or the one that can be very easily be broken into 2 separate countries?
If you owned northern Cyprus (the way that Montenegrians own Montenegro, or the way that the population of each Swiss canton owns their canton) then I would have no problem. But understand that you can not be given the ownership of any part of our land. You have the 18% share of Cyprus as a whole, but no specific part belongs exclusively to you.
You asked for examples and provided them of course these should be adapted to our specific situation which in not only very original but needs to be a fine balance that will allow both sides to commit to making it work.
People are equal. Each TC can have the same effect as each GC.
As individual rights are concerned I agree but what do we do about our community rights of one community dominating and controlling the other.
The correct proportional balance of 18%-82% yes.
Quoting figures means nothing when u do not put in place a mechanism that will take into account each communities wishes without forcing the will of one community on the other.
TCs will be fully represented and each TC representative will have the same effectiveness as each GC representative.
So what you are really saying is that 8GCs can vote against 2TCs and make decisions on behalf of the TC community against their will?