mrfromng wrote: You are too clever for your own good young man. Possession is nine tenths of the law. You don't have the luxury of making me such ridiculous offers. Be more reasonable and I'll give you some land back, behave like you have been I'll give you nothing back. I have the luxury of calling the tunes as I am in possession.
Okay little cynical and provocative individual. There is no point discussing anything further, if this is the logic with which you want to solve the problems. We will just wait patiently until we get the opportunity to become in possession of everything that you currently posses, in the same way that you posses it, and then we will remind you the above little theories of yours. After all, life is a wheel and turns around!
mrfromng wrote:
Yes its a fact "possession is nine tenths of the law". Cyprus is a classic example of this, we have had possession of your land (right or wrong, that's a different matter) for 33 years, what have you done or going to do about it?
Mrfromng, there is no point discussing the above nonsense any longer. Illegal possession of something is called a theft, and a theft can never become the law! The above cliché that you keep quoting may be true in the case of expired leasehold contracts of civil national law, but it is meaningless and irrelevant in our case. Cyprus problem is not a case of an expired leashold contract, in which case the beholder gets priority and a first option, but an international problem and one of illegal invasion and illegal occupation of one country by another. If this is the case, why you did not manage yet to legalize the 1974 theft, why do you keep negotiating with us in the first place and you say that you want to reach a settlement and you even complain that Papadopoulos doesn’t want to negotiate with Talat, and finally, why do you set up property committees in the north through which you say you plan to return properties back to the GCs?
Kikapu wrote: If you're not willing to give up any of your Human Rights, and I can't tell you which ones you should give up, and since we all going to have to give up something in return for the benefit of Cyprus, does it really matter which ones we all need to give up.
Bananiot wrote: I thought your ingenious question was directed at Kikapu, but if you intent to carry on speaking about "ghoasts" please learn at least to spell it properly
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests