The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


ISRAEL MURDERS LEBANESE CHILDREN

Feel free to talk about anything that you want.

Postby cypezokyli » Sat Jul 22, 2006 6:24 pm

Biker wrote:Never mind the Mullahs, the USA, Iran or anywhere else for that matter, Israel had NO moral right to do what they've done to Lebanon.
I've always admired the Israelis and the way they stand up for themselves but now I don't give a shit if they are wiped off the map.


i disagree.
i dont want israel to be wiped of the map.
nor poor lebanese children.
war is not the way out bc it will wismply create more hate.
cypezokyli
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2563
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 6:11 pm
Location: deutschland

Postby G.Man » Sat Jul 22, 2006 8:41 pm

Its ironic that no israel would mean peace in the middle east..

;)
G.Man
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 853
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 8:22 am
Location: Strovolos

Postby cypezokyli » Sat Jul 22, 2006 10:30 pm

thats also wrong.
the arabs have a number of differences between them.
israel is their unifying factor though.
cypezokyli
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2563
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 6:11 pm
Location: deutschland

Postby Iran Forever » Sat Jul 22, 2006 11:03 pm

What do you expect of a country that is Turkey's number one ally? Birds of a feather flock together (Turkey, Israel, Azerbaijan, USA)
User avatar
Iran Forever
Member
Member
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 8:32 pm

Postby Iran Forever » Sat Jul 22, 2006 11:07 pm

Israelis are cowards...instead of fighting man to man, soldier to soldier, they destroy the infrastructure of an entire country, kill civilians, ruin a whole country's future, carry out collective punishment on an entire nation...over what? Two soldiers! Israel, like Turkey, is holding territory illegally...in this particular case, the Chebaa Farms, 200 square kilometers of Lebanese land which it illegally took away in 1982 and has not relinquished yet, and also holding hundreds of Lebanese without any charge being brought against them. Israel has helped Turkey's occupation of Northern Cyprus as well. I thank the Greek Cypriot people for giving shelter to Lebanese refugees of Israel's repeated aggression against Lebanon.
User avatar
Iran Forever
Member
Member
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 8:32 pm

Postby Iran Forever » Sat Jul 22, 2006 11:25 pm

[quote="miltiades"]I support fully and unconditionally the right of Palestinians to have their own state with secure borders and the same for Israel .I dislike the religious element involved , from both sides , that is the poison that creates so much bloodshed and suffering. The Hezbollah are a bunch of fanatics who have as their agenda along with Hamas and Iran , may be Syria too , the destruction of Israel , and if they had the power they would kill every woman man and child and impose their theocratic lunacy on the entire area. Remember the Hezbollah braves started this whole thing by entering Israel killing 6 and abducting 2 . Israel would not capitulate to this provocative action.The force used against Hezbollah is perhaps disproportionate but it will get worse just as soon as the brave warriors of Iran and Syria join in , and they will !

I do not condone murder of innocents by any one. The killing of the innocent Lebanese is a crime against humanity and the fuse that started this mad war was lit by Hamas and Hezbollah. Israel has on its hands the blood of many innocents , but it takes two to tango , so don't demonise Israel and glorify the fanatics that started this. Even the name of their organization is reprehensible , what god would create a party dedicated top the destruction of an entire nation ?? No wonder the bloody religious bullshit started from the part of the world where violence and hatred is rampant.[/quote]

Thank you Miltiades, but your point of view is already being expressed by the Zionist media in the USA, so you can save both your energy and time. Now, Israel possesses three large nuclear facilities, one in Dimona near the Negev Desert, one in Nachal Shorek in the Sorek Valley, one in Misgav in the Upper Galilee...Iran by the way is still eight years away from even getting close to anything resembling a weapon, and does not even have the technology yet to build functional centrifuges. It is hardly a threat to anybody...why don't you talk about Pakistan, which already possesses the weapon, and has a much larger number of fanatics? So Iran's neighbor should possess it, and Iran shouldn't? And no, I am not a mullah-fan, however, this is an issue of national sovereignty, and even anti-Mullah Iranians are united on this. Who are YOU to make judgements about whether Iran should or should not possess the weapon?

Finally, Iran is part of an Armenia-Greece-Russia alliance, and has recognized a united Cyprus that is not the kind the Annan plan was suggesting. In that respect Iran has respected the wishes of the rest of the world. The world of course, does not revolve around your USA, your Israel, or your U.K. (I'm not sure which one of the three you are trying to be a mouthpiece for).

Now if you would like to further the U.S. neocon agenda here, or British interests, (or perhaps the Zionist agenda, since you mimick their line alot) that is a different matter entirely. The colonial days are over. Finally, I am surprised that someone residing in Europe would be so uninformed about what is going on in the world. Israel is the 4th greatest military power in the world, and the USA/Israeli agenda is to demilitarize every country in the Middle East, rendering it impotent vis-a-vis Israel. Part of this unholy alliance is the region's other big aggressor Turkey, and its stepchild Azerbaijan, which has already inaugurated illegal flights into the northern Cypriot airport at Tymbou (which Turks have renamed "Ercan").

Finally, you know NOTHING about Iran other than what the powerful U.S. media has rehashed repeatedly, and we all know who runs the media here in the U.S.A. Really, some of you Westerners are so gullible!
User avatar
Iran Forever
Member
Member
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 8:32 pm

Postby Iran Forever » Sat Jul 22, 2006 11:29 pm

[quote="cypezokyli"]thats also wrong.
the arabs have a number of differences between them.
israel is their unifying factor though.[/quote]

Of course this viewpoint is very common among Turks.
User avatar
Iran Forever
Member
Member
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 8:32 pm

Postby cypezokyli » Sun Jul 23, 2006 12:27 am

you seem to be well informed iran forever.
would you say that there is currently a split between sunnis and shiites ?
starting from iraq and spreading throughout middle east.
is there a rift between hizpollah and al quada (i ve read that in a couple of papers) ?
and how to sunnis (especially the saudis) see the current power politics of iran ?
saudis and egyptians seem to be extremely quiet in the current conflict.
cypezokyli
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2563
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 6:11 pm
Location: deutschland

Postby Iran Forever » Sun Jul 23, 2006 1:26 am

[quote="cypezokyli"]you seem to be well informed iran forever.
would you say that there is currently a split between sunnis and shiites ?
starting from iraq and spreading throughout middle east.
is there a rift between hizpollah and al quada (i ve read that in a couple of papers) ?
and how to sunnis (especially the saudis) see the current power politics of iran ?
saudis and egyptians seem to be extremely quiet in the current conflict.[/quote]

Hi there Cypezkoli!..Cypez,..Hezbollah and Al-Qa'eda have many differences...Hezbollah is mainly concerned with Lebanese issues, and MOST of their activities are limited to Lebanese soil and the Lebanese/Israeli border. It started out as a political organization which carried out charity work for the poor, downtrodden Shi'ites of Lebanon, who are the LARGEST sect in the country and the again, the most disenfranchised. They built schools, hospitals and libraries for the Shi'ite community in Lebanon. They did not have an army per se back then, but a small group of armed men whose job was to protect Shi'ite neighborhoods in Beirut and Shi'ite towns and villages in southern Lebanon. Then in 1982, Sharon invaded Lebanon in "Operation Peace for Galilee", under the pretext of "rooting out the PLO". This attack was provoked by the shooting of Shlomo Argov who was Israel's ambassador to the U.K. at the time...Argov survived the shooting, and the link between his shooting and the PLO was never successfully established. Nonetheless, Sharon violated an already existing ceasefire, bombed the heck out of Shi'ite southern Lebanon as well as West Beirut where many Shi'ites lived, and the Israel army occupied Shi'ite southern Lebanon, in the process rounding up common ordinary Lebanese Shi'ites (including a man who had lived most of his life in Liberia, and was only coming back home to Lebanon to visit relatives he hadn't seen in ages before going back to West Africa), and in violation of international law, sending them to Atlit Prison in northern Israel. The Shi'ites had initially welcomed the Israelis thinking they were there to liberate them from the PLO that had taken over their territory...instead Israel began persecuting Lebanese Shi'ites, even attacking a crowd commemorating Ashura, the holiest day on the Shi'ite calendar, and diverting water from the Litani River in southern Lebanon to northern Israel, and taking over entire towns and even conducting tours of "Upper Galilee and southern Lebanon"! To add insult to injury, Israel illegally ANNEXED Chebaa Farms, a piece of Lebanese territory that was never a part of historical Palestine even, and began restricting movement in southern Lebanon and making Lebanese Shi'ites go through Israeli checkpoints on their own land and in their own country. In response to this, Hezbollah developed a militia (initially with Iranian help, later with Syrian help) to resist Israel and drive them out of southern Lebanon, which they finally managed to do after 18 years.

Israel continues to hold Lebanese citizens without any charge in her prisons, and Hezbollah has asked that they be returned. Israel has refused, resulting in the abduction of two soldiers (NOT civlians). Israel then began bombing Lebanese towns suspected of harboring Hezbollah militants. Then Hezbollah started targetting northern Israeli towns in retaliation. I wish the targetting of civilians would stop on both sides, personally, but now Hezbollah has called for a ceasefire, and Israel refuses to comply, making its goal the impossible objective of getting rid of Hezbollah, perpetuating the violence. But, bottom line is, Hezbollah operates locally.

Al-Qa'eda is a Sunni, Wahhabi, Salafi, organization that considers even Shi'ites as heretics and hates them as much as Christians and Jews. Al-Qa'eda is also very dangerous, because it operates internationally and globally, unlike Hezbollah whose activities are mainly confined to the Middle East, particularly the Levant, and whose main target has traditionally been the IDF, not Israeli civilians...Israel changed the rules of the game by targetting Lebanese civilians, and unfortunately "legitimized" the counterpart by doing so (it is sad when civilians on both sides get caught in the middle and are sacrificed). In Lebanon, Israel has destroyed infrastructure and the very fabric of life.

Al-Qa'eda's targets are innocent civilians. They are cowards who attack soft targets, kill scores of innocent people, and even in battling the U.S. army in Iraq, they have resorted to using I.E.D.'s and roadside bombs instead of facing American troops man-to-man, soldier-to-soldier.

I may not support U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East, but I respect the U.S. army for not using Israeli-style tactics in their war against insurgents in Iraq. You don't see the U.S. army destroying civilian infrastructure in the "Sunni Triangle" or towns and villages that harbor Sunni insurgents. In fact, the U.S. army has tried to keep it clean as much as it can, avoiding civilian casualties, resulting in over 3, 000 dead American soldiers. However, even those who see their presence as an occupation respect them for not stooping down to Israel's modus-operandi. Israel has done the opposite, targetting civilians, indiscriminately bombing cities, towns, villages, infrastructure, power stations, water pipes, even hospitals, in order to bring Lebanon to her knees and break the spirit of the Lebanese people. Over two soldiers! The insurgents in Iraq have held ten times as many U.S. soldiers hostage...you don't see the U.S. army doing what Israel is doing. If those two were civilians, it would be quite different. But soldiers...warring countries and factions have always held each others fighters hostage...it is nothing new.

Hamas is a Sunni Palestinian organization whose activities are limited to the region again (Israel, West Bank, Gaza). Unfortunately they have inadvertantly strengthened the right-wing in Israel by making bad choices and attacking Israeli civilians, but one must mention that 30 times as many Palestinian civilians have been butchered by Israel, and those with a myopic vision of the conflict (like the Israel apologist Miltiades) seem to overlook the fact that over 5, 000 Palestinian civilians (by now it must have reached between 6, 000 and 7, 000 out of a population of only 1.5 million) have died since the Second Intifada began. Hamas made a grave mistake by carrying out suicide attacks three months before Shimon Peres was to be re-elected. That was political suicide for the Palestinians, as Peres was a little more approachable than the idiot who replaced him (whose political career was greatly helped by Hamas, albeit inadvertantly), and while Barak's plan had millions of holes in it, the Palestinians should have come back with a counter-offer or counter-proposal as they did later in Taba (by that time it was too late), instead of having Arafat appear on TV telling Barak to "go to hell". Nonetheless, none of the mistakes made by the Palestinians makes their cause less valid...they have been in Palestine for centuries, they fought alongside the British against Ottoman rule, mainly because of the lies they were fed by Lord MacMahon, British High Commissioner, who promised them an "independent Arab state" in Palestine once the Turks were gone. Add to this King Abdullah I of Transjordania (later renamed Jordan) who was a British stooge, and who secretly negotiated with Zionists, promising them Palestinian land in the "Nablus Triangle"...he was finally shot by a Palestinian in Jerusalem for his betrayal. Had the Arabs not employed British help in liberating themselves from Ottoman tyranny (the Ottoman Empire was on its last legs anyways, and the Arabs should have waited), Israel would have never been created. So the Arabs' only crime is unknowingly spilling their blood in order to pave the way for the creation of a Zionist state. Israel has taken 78 percent of historical Palestine, and built settlements on the remaining 22 percent, (save Gaza), stealing the land and water resources. Golan Heights, Syrian land, was annexed, not even occupied, and Israel was then able to steal water from Lake Galilee (Lake Tiberias), leaving southern Syria dry and parched.

One final note about Hamas...back when the PLO had become the only legitimate Palestinian group Israel could negotiate with, Israel tried to undermine the secular PLO by allowing the radical Islamist Hamas to gain strength...that way they would not be under pressure to negotiate with the PLO (since Hamas would syphon away support from the PLO and draw former PLO supporters to itself), and if Hamas were to become the main popular force in the territories, Israel could successfully argue they are extremists who could not be a party to negotiations...this goes back to long before the Rabin-Arafat handshake in Washington, and back when Israel steadfastly refused to negotiate with the PLO.

There is no banding together yet between the three groups you mentioned Cypez...Shi'ites and Sunnis do converge ideologically however when it comes to battling Israel's bully tactics, but unfortunately do collide in other places (Bahrain for example, where a Sunni family rules over a Shi'ite majority) and in Iraq, where a Shi'ite majority is trying to assert itself for the first time ever.

Sunnis despise Iran...Egypt and Jordan, Sunni majority countries have been total hypocrites in the current Lebanese quagmire...when Sunni Hamas kidnaps an Israeli soldier, they are silent, but when Shi'ite Hezbollah kidnaps two Israeli soldiers, they are quick to criticize Hezbollah.

The Sunni-dominated Arab media is hypocritical too...when Shi'ites are victims of Sunni insurgents in Iraq, they forget that Iraqi Shi'ites are fellow Arabs and fellow Muslims (they focus more on Palestinians killed in Gaza, than twice the number of Shi'ites killed the same day in Iraq, and instead of condemning terrorist insurgent attacks on Shi'ite civilians, they blame the "U.S occupation"). When Shi'ites are victimized and brutalized by Israel however, as they are now, only then do SOME Arab papers begin to recognize Shi'ites as fellow Arabs and fellow Muslims.
Last edited by Iran Forever on Sun Jul 23, 2006 2:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Iran Forever
Member
Member
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 8:32 pm

Postby Iran Forever » Sun Jul 23, 2006 1:35 am

[quote="cypezokyli"]you seem to be well informed iran forever.
would you say that there is currently a split between sunnis and shiites ?
starting from iraq and spreading throughout middle east.
is there a rift between hizpollah and al quada (i ve read that in a couple of papers) ?
and how to sunnis (especially the saudis) see the current power politics of iran ?
saudis and egyptians seem to be extremely quiet in the current conflict.[/quote]

Incidentally, Cypez, I am not a Hezbollah apologist per se, or even a mullah-fan, but I believe Western misconceptions about the Middle East need to be addressed by those whose roots emanate from the region and who know the region.
User avatar
Iran Forever
Member
Member
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 8:32 pm

PreviousNext

Return to General Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 0 guests