simon wrote:
USA supported the coup Militiades, yes or no?
what exactly do you mean by "supported" ?
not prevented ? initiating ? or apporving ?
simon wrote:
I'll say again, Cyprus was never offered to Greece in circumstances where Greece could ever realistically accept.
well it depends what you mean by "could realistically accept". hat the greek king be not pro-german , perhaps greece would have entered WWI sooner.
besides, it is only obvious the Britain would demand sth in return.
and let us not forget harding proposals
simon :
So what the junta made up the army and had the backing of the Church, does this mean it was representative of Greece? Do you even know about the student riots to get them out? They were not democratically elected, were not popular to the citizens and did not represent the citizens.
miltiades:
You mention the student demonstrations in Athens against the Junta ,yes they demonstrated , they also demonstrated constantly during the Vietnam war , the Chilean dictatorship , in support of Fidel of Cuba , in Iraq and Palestine. Well done I say to all those participants.
@simon ,
yes there were students "riots" (i am not sure if riot is the correct word). the reality is also , that the greek junta didnot really receive any significant resistance, besides nov 1973. one of the main reasons, was that (with US financial support) the left in greece was so much suppressed already before the junta came along. nevertheless , the majority of the greeks didnot oppose junta either.
@ miltiadis.
look you can make fun of students, demonstrating against the Iraq war. but it would be good if you showed some respect for those students who died in polytehnio. it is different for me to go to two hours demonstration and come home safe , and those students who gave their lives against junda.
i believe they deserve some respect (even if they were leftists)
miltiades wrote:
"""In a further attempt to gain Greek support for Serbia, Sir Edward Grey offered, on October 16, to transfer Cyprus to Greece. But eight days later the new Greek government of Alexander Zaimis, backed by the king, formally refused the offer. The British foreign secretary's initiative, agreed upon at an informal meeting of the 'War Committee', was criticised both in the cabinet and in the House of Commons for having been taken without proper cabinet consultation. But, in fact, as Roy Jenkins points out in his biography of Asquith, the Cyprus offer had been thoroughly discussed by the cabinet in January 1915. George V's secretary, Lord Stamfordham, had then written to Asquith:
The King desires me to express the earnest hope that the Government will, on further consideration, decide to support Sir E. Grey's proposal and offer Cyprus to Greece on condition of her joining the Allies. . .. Financially Cyprus is I suppose a loss to this country. Strategically, HM understands that it has proved a failure, the harbours impracticable and ships obliged to lie off six miles from the coast."
miltiadi , as kifeas said : when you quote sth from the internet please provide the link.
nevertheless the above statement is interesting (assuming it is true).
a number of studies have shown that imperial powers actually were loosing economically from the colonies. which completely destroys lenins arguments about the colonialists. the motives were likely other than that.
the above quote , shows , once again by how far we tend to overestimate our "strategic position".