Cyprus-Forum.com

by **Kikapu** » Mon Jul 17, 2006 1:26 am

miltiades wrote:The Carlyle Group is a massive investment Group that does not deal mainly in weapons as you say , so that other forum members can try and see Bush , Blair , or Major this is the web side www.carlylegroup.com
Can you tell us where you got that $1,000,000 that G.Bush allegedly receives .

I was refering to Tony Blair who stands to gain about a $$Million bucks a year for consulting fees, for following the dummy, George bush into a illegal war to get British troops killed. Sorry but I do not have hard evidence for you, since I was not invited during the contract signing in the Azores, when the deal was made just before the bombs started falling on the Iraqis heads. You're not suggesting by any chance, that Blair is doing all this for no cash, are you.? Oh, maybe also one of his sons may also become an intern in Congress or the White House, if the NeoCons keep it going long enough to remain where they are now.

by **boomerang** » Mon Jul 17, 2006 6:53 am

I am very positive that good old Tony won't be joining the Carlyle Group for nothing...There will be a fat anual cheque waiting for him for being an obedient poodle...

Anyone watched Fahrenheit 9/11?...Michael Moore gives a damn good description as to what the group does...

by **Pyrpolizer** » Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:13 pm

Viewpoint wrote: She is in the top 4.

Evidence?

wrote: She is a practising lawyer and can take any case she deems she wants to represent. Being the wife the the British PM doesnt not interfer with what cases she takes on, she is not the PM, he is a politician she is a lawyer.

wrote: Thats your opinion as you are on the other side of the fence if she were on your side you would haill her as the best lawyer not only in the Uk but the world, well tough luck shes on our side.

I would still have the same views if she were on the other side

wrote: We voted YES to the only solution that was put before us, what did you do? what have you done since?

We = TCs + Settlers !!!!
voted YES to a plan that donated you 2/3rds of our properties.

by **andri_cy** » Mon Jul 17, 2006 6:29 pm

Well on one hand she does have the right to take any case she wants, because it is her job to defend people and get paid for it. On the other hand, you do have to think about what the price for one's soul is. And I am not talking about the Orma case in particular. I mean Cherie would defend anyone if the price is right, no? Even the people who bombed London because "everyone deserves the best lawyer". It would be ugly for any british lawyer to defend that kind of people but you have to admit that it is much worse when you are the PM's wife because your action wether you like it or not DO carry political weight. I believe in such a case she should stay away from big political cases. But I guess money speaks to her.

by **Viewpoint** » Mon Jul 17, 2006 9:06 pm

Pyrpolizer

Evidence?

Go do your own research and dont forget to look up her practice called Matrix...

I would still have the same views if she were on the other side

The other side being yourside, why do you not sound sincere in what you say?

We = TCs + Settlers !!!!
voted YES to a plan that donated you 2/3rds of our properties.

The voting population of the north vote yes to the only plan that was put before us...you voted no.

andri_cy

Well on one hand she does have the right to take any case she wants, because it is her job to defend people and get paid for it. On the other hand, you do have to think about what the price for one's soul is. And I am not talking about the Orma case in particular. I mean Cherie would defend anyone if the price is right, no? Even the people who bombed London because "everyone deserves the best lawyer". It would be ugly for any british lawyer to defend that kind of people but you have to admit that it is much worse when you are the PM's wife because your action wether you like it or not DO carry political weight. I believe in such a case she should stay away from big political cases. But I guess money speaks to her.

You are discriminating against her because she is married to the British PM. Her profession is a lawyer and she has every right to practice and take on cases as she sees fit...obviously she feels the merits of the case warrant her expertise and support. The money side of things applies to all lawyers not just Cherie. If you take someone to court you cannot expect them to take things lieing down we will argue our side of the story with every means available to us just as you pursue every avenue to isolate and hold us economically hostage.