Cyprus-Forum.com

[Viewpoint]

Gotta say I find this case embarassing being a brit...

Wife of current prime minister getting involved in theft of land... says a lot for the ethics of her and probably UK prime minister..

Hope they lose badly...

well i also hope they loose badly.

but i believe that if we find an act immoral , then that act should always be immoral i.e. cheries blair as the wife of the PM shouldnt take any cases.

the same can ofcource be said for tpap & co , anast. & co , rikkos & co etc etc ...

Lots of lawyers out of work dont you think?

I hope the GCs case gets torn to shreds and provides them with a nasty wake up call that the Cyprus problem cannot be solved by bringing individual cases to law courts, it has to be done via an agreed comprehensive solution. Thats what GC should concentrate on. Who shoud lthey be working with? us the TCs.

[Pyrpolizer]

I hope the GCs case gets torn to shreds and provides them with a nasty wake up call that the Cyprus problem cannot be solved by bringing individual cases to law courts, it has to be done via an agreed comprehensive solution.

"Comprehensive solution" before 1st of May 2004 could include violation of human rights.
"Comprehensive solution" after 1st of May 2004 CANNOT include violation of human rights.

So even if 99 million people vote yes to a "comprehensive solution" that says I lose my property, I can still go to ECHR and get it back, hence trashing the "comprehensive agreement".

I mention this in case you still having illussions as to what a "comprehensive agreement" today can be.

[Pyrpolizer]

And I mean GET IT BACK, not compensation and nonsense.

[Viewpoint]

I hope the GCs case gets torn to shreds and provides them with a nasty wake up call that the Cyprus problem cannot be solved by bringing individual cases to law courts, it has to be done via an agreed comprehensive solution.

"Comprehensive solution" before 1st of May 2004 could include violation of human rights.
"Comprehensive solution" after 1st of May 2004 CANNOT include violation of human rights.

So even if 99 million people vote yes to a "comprehensive solution" that says I lose my property, I can still go to ECHR and get it back, hence trashing the "comprehensive agreement".

I mention this in case you still having illussions as to what a "comprehensive agreement" today can be.

Why wait? do it now and get your property back: Why sign an agreeöemt you do not intend to adhere to?? This is a reflection of your own mindset nothing else.

You can wait for another opportunity at a comprehensive solution one comes around every 30 years but the TCs & the TRNC will not.

[Pyrpolizer]

Don't have the slightest clue what your saying.



I just tried to wipe off any illussions you might have.

[MR-from-NG]

And I mean GET IT BACK, not compensation and nonsense.

And pigs will fly and we will live happily ever after.

[miltiades]

Earlier today , I had a BBQ in the garden , put a lovely pork chop and all the trimmings on the fire , as you do , put it on my plate , sat down to eat it , forgot the wine went into the kitchen , opened the fridge door and suddenly from the corner of my eye I catch sight of this great big cat pouncing on my Pork chop and before I could react it flew over the fence with my bloody Pork chop in it's mouth.So there you have it mrfrong , Pigs do fly !

[MR-from-NG]

Earlier today , I had a BBQ in the garden , put a lovely pork chop and all the trimmings on the fire , as you do , put it on my plate , sat down to eat it , forgot the wine went into the kitchen , opened the fridge door and suddenly from the corner of my eye I catch sight of this great big cat pouncing on my Pork chop and before I could react it flew over the fence with my bloody Pork chop in it's mouth.So there you have it mrfrong , Pigs do fly !

Miltiades for President of ROC.

[andri_cy]

LOL

[Biker]

Viewpoint , would you think it would be proper for the Prime ministers' wife to defend Osama ?....

If he was tried in the UK and if she was a Legal Aid defending Barrister, and if she was appointed... She'd HAVE to take the the case, and "proper" wouldn't come into it...

Now if my Granny had had bollocks, she'd have been my Grandad..