Cyprus-Forum.com

[RichardB]

Maybe she did take the the case on merit!
Perhaps Cherie Blaire really does think that she should defend a couple who knowingly bought on stolen land.
It is possible that she genuinly believes that the Orams are in the right to do this.
Perhaps she honestly believes that it is ok to buy land without the owners knowing.
Perhaps one day pigs will fly and she'll not take on cases purely for the money

[Biker]

She took this case because at the end of the day "Money Talks and Bullshit Walks" She is an independent barrister and NOT the Prime Ministers wife during working hours. (Despite what PapaFlopalot likes to think)

Nobody in the UK gives a flying fuck about what happens in Cyprus and taking this case to the UK was misguided to say the least.

[Pyrpolizer]

This is what happens when an illegality is allowed to continue. The occupied areas was an illegality right from the start.
First we had Asil Nadir stealing millions and escaping there, crippling the British justice.
Then we had some other British crooks escaping there and activating themselves as developers of stolen GC properties.Many of them have pending arrest warrants in the UK (sorry can’t remember names)
Then we had the casinos kicked out of Turkey and concentrating there to make their money laudring crippling whatever legal justice existed in Turkey.

Such people like Cherie worth nothing but our contempt. Let her get millions if she likes. I wonder what good those million will do to her when some day she gets cancer. A trash in her lifetime, a trash in her death.

I don’t expect any decision by the British High Court. I believe they will drop the case. Which -unfortunately- would equal to a go ahead for more theft.

[RichardB]

She took this case because at the end of the day "Money Talks and Bullshit Walks" She is an independent barrister and NOT the Prime Ministers wife during working hours. (Despite what PapaFlopalot likes to think)

Nobody in the UK gives a flying fuck about what happens in Cyprus and taking this case to the UK was misguided to say the least.

I think you are wrong about no one in the UK giving a flying fuck about this case. Both Cypriots in the UK who have lost property in the occupied areas and Brits who have bought in the occupied areas will both be very interested in the outcome.

The reason the case was taken to the UK is because the pseudo goverment of north cyprus does not recognise any court of law bar Turkey and the only way the Aristolides can get recompense at the moment is by applying to the British court for the seizure of the Orams property in the UK.

They are not applying to to the UK court for return of their stolen property but for siezure of the Orams property in the UK

Unfortunatly I agree with pyrpolizer and think that maybe the court will drop the case and that would open up a new bag of nails

[Pyrpolizer]

She is an independent barrister and NOT the Prime Ministers wife during working hours. (Despite what PapaFlopalot likes to think)

For me she is nothing. a big zero.
And you are an Anti- FlopaBikePap.

[Viewpoint]

This is what happens when an illegality is allowed to continue. The occupied areas was an illegality right from the start.
First we had Asil Nadir stealing millions and escaping there, crippling the British justice.
Then we had some other British crooks escaping there and activating themselves as developers of stolen GC properties.Many of them have pending arrest warrants in the UK (sorry can’t remember names)
Then we had the casinos kicked out of Turkey and concentrating there to make their money laudring crippling whatever legal justice existed in Turkey.

Such people like Cherie worth nothing but our contempt. Let her get millions if she likes. I wonder what good those million will do to her when some day she gets cancer. A trash in her lifetime, a trash in her death.

I don’t expect any decision by the British High Court. I believe they will drop the case. Which -unfortunately- would equal to a go ahead for more theft.

Not a very european approach, doesnt everyone have the right to engage the best lawyers they can to fight such an important case. Im sure she would have been hailed a heroine by GCs if she was on your side. She is a very brave lady and Im am sure wealthy enough not to do this just for the financial benefits, I hope she give you hell and kick your butts for opening such a can of worms. You will only have yourselves to blame for not trying harder to reach an overall solution and instead pursuing individual cases.

[miltiades]

She is not on our side ?? Which side would that be ? She is not doing this just for money ?? Yes she adores the principles of fair play.
She will come unstuck and her greed will be exposed . The British judiciary is independent of the Government and can only interpret the law and there is only one interpretation.

[Pyrpolizer]

doesnt everyone have the right to engage the best lawyers

First: Who told you she is the "best" lawyer in the UK?
Second is she so stupid that cannot understand that being the wife of the British PM she is "unsuitable" for this case?
Third:It is not a matter of engaging the best lawyers. It’s a matter of a presumably "best" lawyer lowering herself to the level of common thieves just for the money.

You will only have yourselves to blame for not trying harder to reach an overall solution and instead pursuing individual cases.

While of course yourselves are trying soooo hard to reach a comprehensive solution, and I mean soooo hard, by selling our stolen properties to foreigners, that you can fill a whole buck of sweat.

[Viewpoint]

Pyrpolizer

First: Who told you she is the "best" lawyer in the UK?
Second is she so stupid that cannot understand that being the wife of the British PM she is "unsuitable" for this case?
Third:It is not a matter of engaging the best lawyers. It’s a matter of a presumably "best" lawyer lowering herself to the level of common thieves just for the money.

She is in the top 4.

She is a practising lawyer and can take any case she deems she wants to represent. Being the wife the the British PM doesnt not interfer with what cases she takes on, she is not the PM, he is a politician she is a lawyer.

Thats your opinion as you are on the other side of the fence if she were on your side you would haill her as the best lawyer not only in the Uk but the world, well tough luck shes on our side.

While of course yourselves are trying soooo hard to reach a comprehensive solution, and I mean soooo hard, by selling our stolen properties to foreigners, that you can fill a whole buck of sweat.

We voted YES to the only solution that was put before us, what did you do? what have you done since?

[Viewpoint]

She is not on our side ?? Which side would that be ? She is not doing this just for money ?? Yes she adores the principles of fair play.
She will come unstuck and her greed will be exposed . The British judiciary is independent of the Government and can only interpret the law and there is only one interpretation.

Your side is the GC side, the case was registered by Greek Cypriots on a judgement form a GC administered court in the "RoC".

Dont be silly she is a very wealthy woman and of course lawyers do get fees for their services this is normal practice.

You are praying they will rule in your favor but dont forget in life it can go both ways and of course Cherie and co are also putting forward thier case interpreting the law which they feel is correct, lets see what the judges make of all this.

But dont cry if the ruling send properties sales in the north soaring you only have yourselves to blame.