miltiades , do you know the difference between a state and a non-state actor ?
israel is attacking a state , its civilians and its infrustructure , bc a non-state actor has captured two of its soldiers.
its like saying that england had the right after every attack of the IRA, to bomb dublin.
according to the BBC today, israels action could be proved illegal , according to the charter of the UN. but who cares about the UN ? dont forget that half of their member are uncivilized , not to mention the secretary general himself , he is also from an uncivilized country , so why should israel listen to them ? they have the support of the more civilized (ahem***the strongest***) so its already enough.
ofcource israel cannot be taken to court since it doesnt recognise the geneva convention , nor it is a member of the ICJ. by the way the US also refuced to accept the international criminal court.... i wonder why
you take a wild guess.
as for victory over hizpollah....
israel is ofcource in a position to defeat hizpollah , but the more civilian casualties it causes the more it gives hizpollah soldiers. one doesnot need to read many history books to find that out. if a peaceful peacent saw his child dying from an israel attack it is only natural that he would seek for revenge. even if they destroy the military capabilities of hizpollah , they are creating enough hate , to create a new organisation against them.