Nothing is a rigid as you seem to want to make it, we all want human rights and democracy for all but for speical situations you have to be more innovative and compromising to get the ball rolling otherwise we will continue to maintain the surrent status quo.
We are as compromising as possible. At the same time don't you think that you also have to at least respect our human rights? (we are not even asking from you to be compromising as you ask from us! Just to show some respect!)
express your brand of democracy for all
I have no brand. I want for Cyprus what exist in any other democratic country. For example UK, France, Italy, Greece, Sweden, Spain, Portugal, Latvia, Poland, Germany, Denmark, Ireland, Austria etc. Even what they have in Turkey! Or maybe what they have in all these countries and even in Turkey is "my brand" of democracy?
Therefore I am not asking for a very special kind of "democracy" that will fit my needs and violate your human rights. This is what you demand from us.
This is how the government of the USA (your friends) define democracy:
http://usinfo.state.gov/products/pubs/w ... hatdm2.htm THE PILLARS OF DEMOCRACY
Sovereignty of the people.
Government based upon consent of the governed.
Majority rule.
Minority rights.
Guarantee of basic human rights.
Free and fair elections.
Equality before the law.
Due process of law.
Constitutional limits on government.
Social, economic, and political pluralism.
Values of tolerance, pragmatism, cooperation, and compromise.
Majority Rule and Minority Rights
All democracies are systems in which citizens freely make political decisions by majority rule. But rule by the majority is not necessarily democratic: No one, for example, would call a system fair or just that permitted 51 percent of the population to oppress the remaining 49 percent in the name of the majority. In a democratic society, majority rule must be coupled with guarantees of individual human rights that, in turn, serve to protect the rights of minorities--whether ethnic, religious, or political, or simply the losers in the debate over a piece of controversial legislation. The rights of minorities do not depend upon the goodwill of the majority and cannot be eliminated by majority vote. The rights of minorities are protected because democratic laws and institutions protect the rights of all citizens.
Diane Ravitch, scholar, author, and a former assistant U.S. secretary of education, wrote in a paper for an educational seminar in Poland: "When a representative democracy operates in accordance with a constitution that limits the powers of the government and guarantees fundamental rights to all citizens, this form of government is a constitutional democracy. In such a society, the majority rules, and the rights of minorities are protected by law and through the institutionalization of law."
These elements define the fundamental elements of all modern democracies, no matter how varied in history, culture, and economy. Despite their enormous differences as nations and societies, the essential elements of constitutional government--majority rule coupled with individual and minority rights, and the rule of law--can be found in Canada and Costa Rica, France and Botswana, Japan and India.
So Viewpoint, in Cyprus we can protect the minority rights of Turkish Cypriots in the best possible way. We can also give to TCs more power than any other minority in the whole world. We are VERY flexible and VERY compromising.
But you can not ask as to have in Cyprus something undemocratic that is more similar with Apartheid of South Africa than anything else just because it suits you better that way.
Yes, that current status that is forced illegally against our will is bad. However accepting and legalizing something undemocratic and against human rights would be even worst.