Piratis wrote:Thank you for standing tall and not deny your loyalty to your past and present criminal heroes.
I defend no criminal. I have
never supported Grivas, Samson, or any EOKA B or other Greek Cypriot extremist that had committed crimes.
However for you apparently GC leader = criminal. If a GC leader wanted democracy in Cyprus, with Cypriots, and not the colonialists, running our country for you is a criminal. Let me tell you something Kikapu, in just about every other country the ones who are condemned are those that fought on the side of the colonialists (e.g. the loyalists in the USA) and not those that fought against them.
You support apartheid and discrimination based on race and be sure that such outrageous things will not be accepted. The 18% of TCs are by definition a minority. Aren't the blacks in the USA a minority in their own country? Aren't the Kurds in Turkey a minority in their own country? Aren't the Turks in Bulgaria a minority in their own country? Aren't the (30%) Russians in Latvia a minority in their own country.
Do you know any ethnic group which is much less in numbers than another ethnic group that is not a minority?
We have the saying "Ipen o gadaros tou petinou kefala". Meaning that you demand the punishment of GCs because of the crimes they committed, forgetting that you had committed 100 times more crimes against us. So why should you be rewarded on our expense?
Piratis,
After reading severals posts from the newcomer "webmagus" on other threads, there isn't much I can really add as to what your beloved heroes have done to Cyprus and it's citizens, including the "old dog" PappaD, but you accept all this because he was Democratically elected, and you want me to share your values with the types of persons you support to lead Cyprus. In a word "no thanks". The truth is Piratis, you can never tell the whole truth, you only tell part of the truth that suits your agenda and your propaganda. If I made the claim that you're part of PappaD's propaganda machine to issue half truths and misinformation, I wonder how wrong I would be ? If you were old enough, I would have said, you must have gone to same school as George Bush, "the school of liers" since you both never want to tell the whole truth. There is a criminal that you don't like, but have a lot in common with.
Once again, you tie the TC's with the Turks, for the past crimes agaist the Greek Cypriots going back 300 years, and each time you do that, you lose credibility by trying to hide and side step the crimes done to the TC's from 1963 until the invasion of Turkey. We would have liked to have been saved by our own countrymen during these times, but your heroes were to busy enjoying the 97% of the land that was ill gotten, that did not belong to them. Did PappaD raise an objection to the ill treatment of the TC's, or was he just "following orders".
I have lived most of my life in a "one man one vote" system, so don't try to paint me as being against Democracy, like you painted me as a Nazi for disagreeing with you politically. When I can trust the Democratically run system, even with it's flaws, I can live with whom ever is elected. I have been doing it since Bush the criminal has stolen the elections in Florida 2000. But I trust the system to correct itself politically. What did the majority try to do in Cyprus, they tried to do away with me, so that I won't be around to vote next time. If you did not trust the 70%-30% system to work for all Cypriots in 1960, why would I think, you will do much more for the TC's, if you had 82%-18%. Would you accept your odds, if the situation were reversed, given your past history.
I'm glad you mentioned the blacks in America. It was the "one man one vote" system that kept them slaves for another 80 years after the Independence and the Constitution was written, until the end of the Civil war in 1865, and then it took another 100 years to be allowed to vote and have civil rights. And yes, they should have been given their own land to rule themselves, at least within their own State, much like the Mormons have in Utah. After the slavery was abolished, the 4 million blacks were promised 40 Acres of land and a mule each, but it never happened. You can't always trust the majority to do the right thing. Then there were the 200,000 Japanese Americans that were sent to internment camps, as prisoners after the Pearl Harbour attack in 1941, who had lost all their rights and property. Only about 20,000 surviving persons got some money 50 years later. You can't always trust the majority to do the right thing. If you can't trust me with half the country "politically speaking" don't expect me to trust you with whole of the country, because that's what would happen in essence, with a majority rule.
You have suggested the other day to have a rotating presidency, that every 5th president can be a TC' person. Are you willing to bend the rules of Democracy to say to the GC's, this time only TC's can vote, so that they can have a TC for president once every 20 years or so. That's very advance thinking coming from you, but of course, there's always a catch isn't there Piratis. You would have the legislators ( law makers ) have plenty of power to over rule any veto a TC president makes, since the GC's would be 82%-18%. Agree to make the legislator to pass any bill or veto any bill at 95%, and we can talk about it as a "one man one vote" system.
Time for you to stop going any further than 1960 when we talk about crimes against Cypriots by Cypriots, because you then start talking about Turks from Turkey. Stop associating past crimes by Turkey to the Turkish Cypriots. If our compatriots did not miss treat us, we would not have needed Turkeys help. It's better to make a deal with the devil then end up dead.