I have love and respect for my fellow man, that includes black, white, Indian Greeks and GC's the whole human race.
Those are empty words full of hypocrisy mrfromng. Where is your respect to others when you support the violation of their human rights and you support the Turkish army for keeping them away from their own homes at gun point?
I don't know whether TC's may or may not have wanted partition soon after the constitution was written, but what is know as a fact, is that, Makarios was building up to 5'000 secret militia force for something he had in mind for the TC's, and soon after that, he wanted to alter the constitution, knowing full well, that the TC's would never agree to it. So you really can't blame the TC's for fighting to keep the constitution intact, no matter how unfair it may have been written against the GC's. Makarios should have used a democratic way to change it.
Makarios didn't do anything undemocratic. He simply
proposed changes to the constitution. In fact those changes were never implemented neither in 1963 or later. So stop the lies and theories about what Makarios "had in mind".
Maybe a murderer would now be justified to come and kill you with the excuse that you had something bad in mind? I hope you understand how lame and ridiculous that excuse is.
As far as TC's celebrating arrival of the Turkish invasion force, would be a little surprise if they did not. TC's for the most part were at the mercy of the GC's from 1963 until 1974. Those years would have been the best time for the Greek Cypriots to correct the mistakes of 1963 and look for a solution, but instead you had 80% of the country (GC's ) going about their lives as normal as possible, knowing full well, the other 20% ( TC's ) had to live from day to day under the protection of the UN. Yes, I'm not at all surprised that the TC's saw the arrival of the invasion force as their day of freedom as if it was their version of the "Normandy landings".
Nomandy landings liberated France from the foreign occupation. The Turkish invasion was a land grab followed by ethnic cleansing. How can you confuse these exact opposite things?
The closer example in WWII that resembles what happened in Cyprus was when Hitler had invaded Czechoslovakia using the excuse of protecting the German minority there.
You insist on blaming only the GCs for the intercommunal conflict presenting the TCs as the victims. It was not like that. An about equal number of GCs and TCs had been killed during that conflict. The TCs were supplied weapons from Turkey to fight for their partition dream, and TCs terrorist organization of TMT was murdering innocent Greek Cypriots.
So in that conflict both sides were equally guilty. Would you also support the ethnic cleansing of TCs from Cyprus as a way of ending that conflict in the way that you support the ethnic cleansing of Greek Cypriots?
Do you think the Greek Cypriots made the right decision when they tried to change the constitution in the 60's?
As I said above Makarios made
proposals for the change of constidution. Since when is making proposals for changing something that is obviously racist and unfair (e.g. 18% of TCs having 30% of governmental jobs), something bad?
Why was the constitution accepted then if you didnt think it was just or in your words "forced upon you"?
Because no other option was given. It was either that or continuation of the British rule. It is like if I take you hostage and I ask you if you prefer to cut your arm or your head giving you no other option. Thats what happened.