“The Turkish government so far has done whatever it could for a Cyprus settlement. So, if the reunification efforts fail because of the Greek Cypriot vote, it shouldn’t hurt Turkey’s EU position,” said Tom Weston, the U.S. State Department’s special coordinator for Cyprus. "
http://groups.msn.com/CyprusForum/gener ... 5663048244
The plan of the Annan plan, was to find a acceptable formula for Turkey. The Greek Cypriot side indicated from the inception of the Annan plans that any solution was acceptable, as long as Cyprus was part of the EU.
Karpasia was an option in the Annan 1. Turkey rejected it out right.
The balanced tipped after Turkey(military)/Denktash repeatedly rejected any and all options. The EU then, proceeded, against the US/UK direction, to declare that Cyprus will be part of the 10, with or without a solution. This was an added measure of pressure for Turkish reform, promoted by Greece).
This was the "big mistake", for those promoting the dissolution of the RoC, like Bananiots and the likes of him.
The Greek Cypriot leadership's primary goal, was to enter the EU, with the asumption that the EU laws would be implemented throughout Cyprus, once becoming a member. This asumption was proved wrong, when the Annan plan, among other unfavorable to the GC conditions, included the derogations from the European common law.
By this stage, Turkey was too far from the original Annan I. The only way way to get Turkey out of the difficult position, as this stage, was a "UN" plan that would be rejected only by the GC side. We got it.
More here (We keep saying the same things, over and over, since 2001, let's move on).