Kikapu wrote:Just a question on was written in the paper. Is it to my understanding that the return of property/compensation claims by the TCs from ROC is because ROC has to fulfill it's obligations under the EU regulations on human rights and the rest. Since the ROC chose to go into EU alone without the TCc by voting NO, on the re-unification referendum, and being the only recognised government, it can then be legally sued by thy TCs. Had the vote was a YES on the reunification, then the TRNC would also had to comply by the
If both communities had voted yes to the Annan plan, then both the RoC and the "TRNC" would have been dissolved and a new state of affairs would have replaced them. "TRNC" is anyway a non-existing entity by international law, that is why I said that Turkey owes the G/C community and not the "TRNC."
The fact that the RoC became a member of the EU is largely irrelevant, when it comes down to honouring its obligations towards it citizens. Even before the RoC became an EU member, the obligations towards its own citizens were still valid and perfectly enforceable through the ECHRs, as they are now after EU entry. Nothing has changed on the legal status of all such matters due to RoC EU accession, or due to the rejection of the Annan plan by the G/C community.