The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


The Worst Solution Plan - "Piratis Plan" :)

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

cvp

Postby PEACE » Fri Apr 07, 2006 5:10 pm

Sotos wrote:Why is the worst solution plan? Any plan that is based on human rights and not just the demands of Turkey is bad? :roll:


Annan Plan was Ok.According to you everthing is violating your human rights but i suppose you don't know the meaning of "violation".For example getting compensation for your properties is a violation for you and UN made a plan which includes full violation of human rights. :lol: :lol: But don't forget the plan didn't prepared by ordinary people where they found in the street and these professionals know what is a violation and what is not... Do you know that Annan Plan was a summary of all negotations' result? It's a base and will be a base but in different name.
User avatar
PEACE
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 386
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2003 3:20 pm
Location: Lefke,Cyprus

Postby PEACE » Fri Apr 07, 2006 5:30 pm

it is stupid to call "ethnic cleansing" the death of some 100s of TCs during a period of several years, especially when GCs had about the same number of victims as well during the same period.


No,it is not.What happened in some villages are ethnic cleasing.Because %99.9 of the population had been killed and burried together in large holes.



The ones who killed by Ottpmans are not realed with TCs.We are not Ottomans.Also are you sure that is killed was GCs? Were there Gcs in 1571 or Venedians?
User avatar
PEACE
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 386
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2003 3:20 pm
Location: Lefke,Cyprus

GIVE ALL THE LAND BACK

Postby lysi » Fri Apr 07, 2006 7:37 pm

Hey PEACE, what about if the turks give back all the land and property that they occupy and all the british maggots who have bought homes built on stolen greek cypriot land are made to give them up and then for the turkish army to piss of back to there nice country ?
Would that be fair ? what do you think ?
lysi
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 702
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2005 4:39 pm

Re: cvp

Postby andri_cy » Fri Apr 07, 2006 8:59 pm

PEACE wrote: Most probably there won't be a seperate state.May be there can be 3 zones.TC state,GC state and a mixed state at the centre.

Ok so how do you suppose this whole thing will work? Each state has a "governor" and then a federal government or something different. This might end up being an interesting thing to discuss. Also not a totally bad idea as a solution.
User avatar
andri_cy
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2491
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 5:35 am
Location: IN, USA

Re: GIVE ALL THE LAND BACK

Postby PEACE » Fri Apr 07, 2006 10:01 pm

lysi wrote:Hey PEACE, what about if the turks give back all the land and property that they occupy and all the british maggots who have bought homes built on stolen greek cypriot land are made to give them up and then for the turkish army to piss of back to there nice country ?
Would that be fair ? what do you think ?


Can you ask the same thing in different way and more clear,please ? Cos,i couldn't understand exactly what you are asking. :?


andri_cy wrote: Ok so how do you suppose this whole thing will work? Each state has a "governor" and then a federal government or something different. This might end up being an interesting thing to discuss. Also not a totally bad idea as a solution.


I'm not the creator of this three-zoned solution idea.If you know Turgut Afsaroglu, who is a writer in Afrika Newpaper, i heard this idea firstly from his daily article.I suppose TC and GC state will governor themself (Like a federal state does) and in these states there will be only GCs or Tcs.The ones who don't want to live together will live in these parts and those who wants to live together will live in mixed part in the centre region and this area will be governored by common goverment.

If this type solution seems more appropriate it can be a "base".
User avatar
PEACE
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 386
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2003 3:20 pm
Location: Lefke,Cyprus

Postby stuballstu » Fri Apr 07, 2006 10:13 pm

Piratis

Who talked about enosis now?? What I am saying is that when Turks as recently as 1974 were killing Greek Cypriots by the 1000s within days, it is stupid to call "ethnic cleansing" the death of some 100s of TCs during a period of several years, especially when GCs had about the same number of victims as well during the same period.
GCs wanting enosis is one thing, and for many GCs this was the case. But there was no attempt for "ethnic cleansing" against TCs and the historical facts prove this.
Or is just wanting enosis a crime? Let me ask you something. In Turkey there is more than 20% of Kurdish minority. Does this mean that Turkish citizens as a whole (Kurdish minority included) do not have the right of self determination? The same can be said for the Turkish minority in Bulgaria, the African American minority in USA etc.

Quote:
3 Centuries ago times were different, there were no human rights laws. It is not fair to compare what happened 3 centuries ago to the modern day. Life is completely different.


In the case of Turkey 3 centuries ago and today are no different. 1974 was just 32 years ago, but even today Turkey continues to ignore international law and human rights.


Piratis

Dont you see? You say that Turkey was looking for excuses to invade Cyprus, maybe they were but guess what GC's and Greece gave them the excuse when the decided that they wanted Cyprus to be part of Greece. What historical facts have you got about the numbers of TC's being killed, there is still many missing persons on both sides as well as the already accounted for dead. Are you saying that there are no more than 100's of TC's missing/presumed dead. I know there are many GC's missing also presumed dead, maybe you could give me ideas of numbers as you seem to know them when referring to TC's.

This is not a forum about Turkey, i think you'll find the name of the site is "cyprus forum".

Or
is just wanting enosis a crime?


No but trying to implemement it is.

If Turkey wanted to it could have taken over the whole island in 1974 and the whole island would have Turkish then. You call the Turkish army butchers and that there are 200000 GC refugees. It could have been worse they may have been another 200000 dead god forbid.



Oh I see. So the GCs are evil because they committed some crimes against TCs, but the Turks who have committed 100 times more crimes against GCs are very nice because they could have committed much more crimes. So GCs deserve a punishment, but Turks deserve to be thanked for not committing even more crimes
.

I have NEVER said that GC's are evil. GC's and TC's committed crimes against each other, however GC's quest for Enosis along with Greek backing makes the situation evil.


Quote:
I have a TC friend who now lives in Karavas. Him and his brother got 6 donums of land in "exchange" for his 110 donums in Paphos. You call that fair?

Never. What I call fair is if everybody gets his own land back. What do you call fair?


Not everyone will get there land back. Financial compensation or land in exchange is going to be the fairest. To be fair not everyone wants their land back either.


It is the opposite. Most got more. Do not forget that the 18% of TCs controll 37% of the land. Where did they gave the rest of the land if most TCs got less?
If most TCs got less then the total land of all TCs in occupied areas would be less than 18%. So who got the 20% of land? The settlers? Don't the TCs argue that the settlers are not the majority in the occupied areas? Or settlers are in fact the majority?


As you are always throwing numbers about can you answer me a few questions.

What percentage of land was owned by TC's pre 1974?
What percentage of land was owned by GC's pre 1974?
What percentage of land was foreign owned pre 1974?
What percentage was owned by the government pre 1974?

Quote:
I have never said that TMT were not so bad

You clearly said that TMT was not as bad as EOKA. I am glad that you now changed your mind.


Time for a challenge. Go back and quote me a post when i have said that TMT were not so bad. To save you the trouble dont bother looking as it doesnt exist. I have the same opinion on ALL terrorist organisations, they are all scum. I would never say one is better than the other they are all as bad as each other. I'll accept you apology for the mis information whenever you are ready to give it. If you are going to try and quote me at least paste the quote instead of making nonsense up.

And in 1955 you were born and a witness to the actions of EOKA I guess, right?


No, were you? I had family who served in the British army during these times who witnessed the results of attrocities on both sides.

OK mr. THE TRUTH


Thanks
stuballstu
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 301
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:49 pm
Location: Cyprus

Re: cvp

Postby Piratis » Fri Apr 07, 2006 11:45 pm

PEACE wrote:
Piratis wrote:Who knows. What we know already is that GCs are 82%. If you are not willing to accept 18% because at a future time you might be more than 18% then why do you expect GCs to accept less than 82% when they are already 82%? An 82% -18% land split is only fair.


I meant for both sides it is valid.Yes,GCs won't stay today's number too. So a solution that its base is population to land can't be functional.

PEACE, TCs and GCs are citizens of the whole Cyprus. They own property in the whole Cyprus. TCs are not like Kurds in Turkey that they historically have a separate region of their own.
What we had were purely TC villages spread around Cyprus. We could have gone that way and adopt a canton system were the TC state would have several small cantons in Cyprus.
But if we don't go based on land ownership and we don't go based on population either, then how else are we going to make this split in a fair way?


Many times the official figures have been posted in this forum that show that TC land ownership was actually even less than 18%. In Cyprus such records were kept very precisely since the British rule. Now some people are trying without any basis to convince us that TCs were the rich land lords of Cyprus.


Which offical figures? Goverment posts offical figures to this forum? :lol: :lol:


It has been posted several times before in this forum. I will post it again and quote Kifeas very good analysis on it. This answers stuballstu question as well.

Image

Kifeas wrote: If you look at the bottom percentage row (red,) the total TC private (individuals, companies, EVKAF) land ownership was 12.23% of the total territory of Cyprus. There is also a 26.3% of public (national) land. This land should be split according to the population percentage of each community, because it is public (forests, mountains, parks, roads, etc.) This means that your share from this public land is 26.3% x 18% = 4.74%. If we add the 12.23% of private land and the 4.74% of your share from the public land then it makes us 16.97% (17 %.) Now we also have some 2.7% of the area of Cyprus which is British bases (i.e. it is not controlled by the GCs or the TCs.) Therefore, from this 2.7% we must subtract your contribution share which is 2.7% x 18% = 0.49%.

The final result of your share based on land ownership will be 16.97% minus (-) 0.49% = 16.48%. I want to be a little bit generous and round this up to 16.5% of Cyprus territory.



The best solution base is Annan Plan.One of the main problem in Cyprus problem is property problem and this should be solved like in Annan Plan.
Some will return and others won't and will get compensation.This is NOT a violation of your human rights.You'll get its price! If you can't return and can't get its price than its a violation.When goverment does nationalization your human rights are violated? :roll: Other solutions are imaginary and are in conflict of EU's principles.


Annan plan was the best for you, not for us. It was a disguised partition that solved the problems of TCs and Turkey and even satisfied the 90% of their demands, but it didn't even solve the most important problems of GCs.
Annan plan was in violation of human rights and was in a huge conflict with EU principles. This is why if it was accepted several derogations from the EU principles would be required.



Most probably there won't be a seperate state.May be there can be 3 zones.TC state,GC state and a mixed state at the centre.


So the other 2 states will not be mixed? Is ethnic purity what you are after? Sorry but this will not happen. Ethnic cleansing will not be legalized.

No,it is not.What happened in some villages are ethnic cleasing.Because %99.9 of the population had been killed and burried together in large holes.


There was never a village that the 99.9% of the population was killed. Yes, a few villages suffered many losses during the intercommunal conflict. But in total both GCs and TCs had about the same number of casualties. So you can't say that some 100s of TC victims is ethnic cleansing and some 100s of GC victims is not.
The ethnic cleansing was performed by Turkey in 1974. The northern part of Cyprus had a great majority of GC population. The Turkish army killed and forced the all (apart from a few 100 people) out of that area: It ethnically cleansed it.
User avatar
Piratis
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 12261
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:08 pm

Postby Piratis » Sat Apr 08, 2006 12:26 am

Dont you see? You say that Turkey was looking for excuses to invade Cyprus, maybe they were but guess what GC's and Greece gave them the excuse when the decided that they wanted Cyprus to be part of Greece.

Who gave them the excuse was the CIA sponsored illegal Junta of Athens along with the help of EOKA-B a terrorist organization that fought against our democratically elected president and tried to kill him. Those generals were jailed for their crimes. I have never supported their illegal actions.
So yes, there was an excuse, but thats about it, an excuse.
If it was OK to invade sovereign countries whenever a coup happened it them then Turkey should have been invaded and partitioned several times already.

What historical facts have you got about the numbers of TC's being killed, there is still many missing persons on both sides as well as the already accounted for dead. Are you saying that there are no more than 100's of TC's missing/presumed dead. I know there are many GC's missing also presumed dead, maybe you could give me ideas of numbers as you seem to know them when referring to TC's.

Nobody knows the exact numbers. However the victims from both sides during the intercomunal conflict were some 100s. TCs add to this number their casualties that happened after the 1974 Turkish invasion had started, by some GCs seeking revenge for the invasion. (e.g. The Tochni massacre were 84 TCs were killed on August 14, 1974 in tochni village). But of course during the invasion the GC casualties were several 1000s, not 100s.

is just wanting enosis a crime?


No but trying to implemement it is.

I agree that after 1960 trying to implement enosis was illegal. But as I told you already this was done by a small minority of GCs that belonged to EOKA-B. In 1974 Enosis was not supported by the great majority of GCs neither from our government. Here is part of Makarios speech after the coup on 19/7/1974:

What has been happening in Cyprus since last Monday morning is a real tragedy. The military regime of Greece has callously violated the independence of Cyprus. Without trace of respect for the democratic rights of the Cypriot people, without trace of respect for the independence and Sovereignty of the Republic of CYPRUS, the Greek junta has extended its dictatorship to Cyprus. It is indeed a fact that for some time now the intention was becoming obvious. The people of Cyprus had for a long time feeling that a coup by the Greek junta was brewing, and this feeling became more intense during the recent weeks when the terrorist organisation 'EOKA B', directed from Athens, had renewed its wave of violence. I knew all along that the illegal organisation had its roots and supply resources in Athens.

So because one foreign country along with some traitors violated our sovereignty this means that another foreign country has the right to use that excused to keep violating our sovereignty 32 years after that excuse has expired?

I have NEVER said that GC's are evil. GC's and TC's committed crimes against each other, however GC's quest for Enosis along with Greek backing makes the situation evil.

So you clearly put the blame only on Greece, GCs, and not on the Turkish side who has committed 100 times more and worst crimes over much longer periods of time.

Not everyone will get there land back. Financial compensation or land in exchange is going to be the fairest. To be fair not everyone wants their land back either.

Nobody can force people to give up their properties. It is not only fair, but their basic human right that they receive their land back. You might disagree, but the European Court of Human Rights agrees with what I say here.
If somebody chooses compensation/exchange then fine. But you can not force anybody to do so.

As you are always throwing numbers about can you answer me a few questions.

What percentage of land was owned by TC's pre 1974?
What percentage of land was owned by GC's pre 1974?
What percentage of land was foreign owned pre 1974?
What percentage was owned by the government pre 1974?


See my previews post for an answer.

Time for a challenge. Go back and quote me a post when i have said that TMT were not so bad.


You said: "Are you serious? This is not the first time that you have made reference to TMT and as usual go on about the Ottomans. Whilst both TMT and EOKA committed crimes against humanity you have to admit that EOKA backed by Greece did try to "ethnically cleanse" Cyprus of Turkish Cypriots on a large scale. "
So you got upset that I even made a reference to TMT while you always keep talking about EOKA. According to you TMT had just "committed crimes" while EOKA "tried to 'ethnically cleanse' Turkish Cypriots on a large scale." Anybody can see that for you TMT was not as bad as EOKA. Please don't try to deny it. The same goes for Greece and Turkey. You keep blaming Greece, while you excuse the crimes of Turkey.

No, were you? I had family who served in the British army during these times who witnessed the results of attrocities on both sides.

My family was always in Cyprus and they had experienced those and all the previews events as well.
Do you consider the British as an objective outside observer in Cyprus stuballstu? You know that this is not the case, and your sayings reflect this.
User avatar
Piratis
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 12261
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:08 pm

Postby stuballstu » Sat Apr 08, 2006 6:53 pm

My family was always in Cyprus and they had experienced those and all the previews events as well.
Do you consider the British as an objective outside observer in Cyprus stuballstu? You know that this is not the case, and your sayings reflect this.


Piratis

Someone looking from the outside inwards, sees something different from someone on the inside looking outwards.

Lets not kid ourselves on Britain, Greece, GC's Turkey and TC's are not all innocent in all of this. Personally i think Britain has a lot to answer for as they could have intervened at any time but didnt, well not on any large scale anyway. As a British citizen myself most Cypriots are right to question Britains "involvement" in the 60's and 70's. I am ashamed to admit that i do.

Quote:
Time for a challenge. Go back and quote me a post when i have said that TMT were not so bad.


You said: "Are you serious? This is not the first time that you have made reference to TMT and as usual go on about the Ottomans. Whilst both TMT and EOKA committed crimes against humanity you have to admit that EOKA backed by Greece did try to "ethnically cleanse" Cyprus of Turkish Cypriots on a large scale. "
So you got upset that I even made a reference to TMT while you always keep talking about EOKA. According to you TMT had just "committed crimes" while EOKA "tried to 'ethnically cleanse' Turkish Cypriots on a large scale." Anybody can see that for you TMT was not as bad as EOKA. Please don't try to deny it. The same goes for Greece and Turkey. You keep blaming Greece, while you excuse the crimes of Turkey.


I have never said that TMT were not so bad like you claimed. I'll take the public apology as a mis quote as you obviously have got me mixed up with someone else. You will NEVER see me written posted this as i have very strong feelings of ALL terrorist organisations and have a contempt of them all regardless of race, religion or gender.

Not everyone will get there land back. Financial compensation or land in exchange is going to be the fairest. To be fair not everyone wants their land back either.


Nobody can force people to give up their properties. It is not only fair, but their basic human right that they receive their land back. You might disagree, but the European Court of Human Rights agrees with what I say here.
If somebody chooses compensation/exchange then fine. But you can not force anybody to do so


Interesting you have also posted a landownership table which makes interesting reading and i will go over it when i have a little more time. However a quick reference to this shows that in the ROC controlled areas TC's had 10% of the land and GCs had 61.7% of the land. So why did the ROC government choose TC land to build on ie and airport, a power station to name a few. Are they saying that there was no suitable sites on the remaining 90% of the ROC controlled areas or is it just a coincidence that the TC land was the most suitable? So therefore not all refugees have the right to return to their land unless you want a TC owning Larnaca Airport.
stuballstu
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 301
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 8:49 pm
Location: Cyprus

Postby Piratis » Sun Apr 09, 2006 12:46 am

Someone looking from the outside inwards, sees something different from someone on the inside looking outwards.


Different maybe. Objectively, it depends. In another thread you said that you have visited the casinos in the occupied areas. I hope you don't count yourself as objective outsider.

Lets not kid ourselves on Britain, Greece, GC's Turkey and TC's are not all innocent in all of this. Personally i think Britain has a lot to answer for as they could have intervened at any time but didnt, well not on any large scale anyway. As a British citizen myself most Cypriots are right to question Britains "involvement" in the 60's and 70's. I am ashamed to admit that i do.


Yes, all of the parties had a negative involvement. UK didn't do in the 60s and 70s what it was supposed to do according to the Treaty of Guarantee. But UKs part of guilt is not what they have not done in the 60s and 70s, but what they did during that time and during most of the century before that when they kept Cyprus as a colony by force, exploited Cypriots and performed their divide and rule policies.

I have never said that TMT were not so bad like you claimed. I'll take the public apology as a mis quote as you obviously have got me mixed up with someone else.

I took the quote from this post of yours: http://www.cyprus-forum.com/viewtopic.php?p=79585#79585 . To me it was obvious that you considered TMT as an as bad as EOKA. If this is a misunderstanding from my part then I am glad.


However a quick reference to this shows that in the ROC controlled areas TC's had 10% of the land and GCs had 61.7% of the land. So why did the ROC government choose TC land to build on ie and airport, a power station to name a few. Are they saying that there was no suitable sites on the remaining 90% of the ROC controlled areas or is it just a coincidence that the TC land was the most suitable? So therefore not all refugees have the right to return to their land unless you want a TC owning Larnaca Airport.

So the 82% of GCs that has forced in the 67% of land by the Turkish invasion it was supposed to live in the 57% of land until Turkey decided to end its occupation? Is this what you mean?

Land from all Cypriots was taken to house the refugees and rebuild what was taken by the Turkish army. This was not our choice but what we were forced to do. Our refugees were not given titles to the TC land. That land will be returned to the TCs after the solution. If the Nicosia airport was not rendered useless by the Turkish occupation a new airport would not be required.
User avatar
Piratis
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 12261
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 11:08 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest