I dont know where to start from regarding the so many misconceptions of bakala. Should I start from his obsession regarding the Suez Canal? Which Canal happens to be in Egypt not in Cyprus? Which happens to be 100 miles away from the nearest shore of Cyprus and separated by 100 miles of sea from here? Which can be controlled ONLY when one controls Egypt and the other neighbouring countries and NOT Cyprus?
Regarding the period of 1963-1967 when the intercommunal fightings between the GCs and TCs happened: There was a dual objective then: Enosis for the GCs, Taksim for the TCs. Enosis did not necessarily require any violation of any rights of the TCs, nor any killing nor any confiscation of their properties nor any ethnic cleansing. TCs however thought that any of these was very propable. Taksim required that the TCs take by force a part of Cyprus, do ethnic cleansing against the GCs, take their properties, move there and declare another independent state.Exactly what happened in 1974 btw. It is a fact that some paramilitary GC forces were attacking organised TMT TC forces, not for Enosis per se, but to destroy their organising of Taksim, which like I said required something like the 1974 events to materialise.
In this fighting Greece did its part using paramilitary as well as state forces (Grivas, ex-Eokas etc) Turkey used the TC villagers by arming them and creating a situation of numerous small states within a state that would later unite to create partition. This is the situation in which innocent TC people were killed between 1963 and 1967. Generally the TCs suffered more during that period, but certainly they were not so innocent themselves either.
The 1974 invasion was simply the completion of what was left incomplete by Turkey in 1968.