by Svetlana » Fri Mar 31, 2006 10:55 am
Hi Bakala
Unfortunately, implementation of the revised law is far complete (this from a TRNC source):
UBP And TKP Made A Recourse To The TRNC Constitutional Court Yesterday To Have The New Property Law Rescinded
Prime Minister Ferdi Sabit Soyer has said that the National Unity and the Communal Liberation Parties took a wrong step by taking the new “Law on Property Compensation, Exchange and Reinstatement” to the TRNC Constitutional Court.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Prime Minister accused the two parties of trying to achieve political gains with the Court challenge.
Stressing the Constitutional Court’s independence, Mr Soyer said that the Presidential Palace and the Government – which supported the law – will defend it full heartedly.
Speaking before entering this afternoon’s Council of Ministers meeting, Prime Minister Soyer criticized the main opposition National Unity Party and the Communal Liberation Party for taking the new property law to the TRNC Constitutional Court.
He said that the UBP is punishing the Turkish Cypriot people for the will it expressed during the April 2004 referendum and that the Communal Liberation Party is trying to secure political gains through their Court challenge.
The Prime Minister explained that the ruling by the European Court of Human Right’s on the Aresti case was the basis of the new law.
He said that the Court’s ruling on the Aresti case was not welcomed by the Greek Cypriot Administration which wants to put an end to the bi-zonal order on the island and to take the property issue outside the framework of a comprehensive solution to the Cyprus problem.
Mr Soyer noted that the new law was prepared as a local remedy to cases filed by the Greek Cypriots on property.
Earlier, the Minister of Interior Ozkan Murat also reacted to the two parties’ challenge against the law and defended the law by saying that it is not in violation of the Republic’s Constitution.
He said that new law is designed to be seen by the ECHR as an adequate domestic means of handling property disputes, but underlined the fact that a political settlement to the Cyprus problem could only bring a solution to the property cases, and not the court rulings.
Yesterday, the main opposition National Unity Party and the Communal Liberation Party made a recourse to the TRNC Constitutional Court to have the new “Law on Property Compensation, Exchange and Reinstatement” rescinded.
The law envisages compensation, exchange and reinstatement of property in the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus that belonged to Greek Cypriots before the events in 1974.
The two parties, separately, decided to take the issue to the TRNC Constitutional Court - yesterday - on the last day of the three-month period allowed by the Constitution to demand that a new law is rescinded.
They claim that the new legislation constitutes a violation of the TRNC Constitution.
________________________________________________________
The other major issue is one of confidence; the largest development (by far) in the occupied area - Amaranta Valley has been at a standstill for 6 months now. The (British) developer's bank accounts frozen, his assets ceased and his citizenship revoked. Hopefully this will be sorted shortly, but but it has done nothing for market confidence and the resale market in the north is dead.
Added to this, the proposals, subsequently rescinded, to add retorspective VAT, all property owned by foreigners to be made leasehold only etc really have put doubt in the minds of those who look beyond the low price.
Lana