Still incorrect, and your point is rendered irrelevant.
to say more than 3,000 years is clearly not an indication of...3,000 and beyond till infinity and the end of the universe and Newton's and Einstein's laws as we know it.
No, I'm afraid the inference is that the time span is 3,000 years or a little way past this, but not an incredible amount more. Otherwise, why provide the figure of 3,000 years.
Go back to school, and don't leave until you get what is called a 'qualification'.
So you avoid the point of contention by attacking the other person's inference. Very clever, but no dice. Your original assertion was that Piratis' statement implies there is a cap of 3000 years beyond which Cypriots stop talking Greek. I pointed out your (obvious) mis-interpretation and so you attack mine instead. That's all well and good, and perhaps my interpretation is incorrect but that does not hide the fact that yours also is incorrect.
Ok, so what you're saying is, from the statement:
In Cyprus we speak Greek for more than 3000 years
It's ok to infer that Cypriots stop speaking Greek after 3000 years has elapsed, but that it's not ok to infer that Cypriots speak Greek for over 3000 years and that moreover we don't know when they stop speaking Greek, i.e. the exact opposite of your argument?
Clearly your argument makes no logical sense whatsoever.