by maewing » Fri Feb 24, 2006 6:41 am
Thank you Piratis,
This was the sentiment I got from GCs--that they hate the Turkish involvement but not the TCs. I do not know enough TCs to say I have gotten a conscensus opinion, but when I have told some I am permanently moving to Cyprus, they assume I mean the southern part and have no apparent negative feelings about it.
Your point about "average" is well taken but I asked about it only to get an idea of the direction one might think a "vote" might go in. For example, if we can stop calling each other names for a moment (including calling others "racist", LALA), let's talk about some true idiots: George Bush and Condoleeza Rice. These people touted democracy in the Middle East and forced an election on their terms in Palestine. Having no clue about the "average opinion" (in this I mean the voting average) they were shocked when the outcome was for Hamas. They were shocked that the average sentiment was for terrorists and now, flaunting democracy, want to remove these people by force.
Now taking this as a lesson, suppose a general election were held in Cyprus and voters (both TC and GC, let's assume) were asked to vote on issues such as the repatriation of homes (both sides), expulsion of Turkish forces, parliamentary representation and so forth. It would be the average opinion that would prevail, would it not? (Keeping in mind, that the size of the TC minority might not matter if there is a representative element to the structure). What then would be the average opinion on these issues? Would it be possible to hold such an election?
Left up to the US, UN, Turkey and Greece, I would argue that they would attempt to alter the outcome to their liking. Would we want these people to decide Cyprus' fate should the election not go in the direction they would like? Please comment.