by maewing » Wed Mar 01, 2006 8:17 am
Hi tcklim,
Just to clarify, I am not anti-Turkish (at all) but anti-Turkish occupation and many of my reasons for this follow what TheCabbie just eloquently wrote. Unfortunately, no Islamic country has a solid track record for tolerance or freedom--though Muslims demand it for themselves in every country where they have representation. You can insert almost everything I have said about Turkey or the Turkish with the word "Muslim" or "Islamic" since it is this intolerant adherence (not their ethnicity or "race" to use a poor term) which, in my view, is the problem.
My fear is that this ontolerance would spread in Cyprus if the gateway was opened to Muslims freely occupying the island with the force of Turkish military behind them. If you lived in a Muslim country, tcklim, then you know that in most of them (where they completely flattened the ancient churches, such as Arabia) most Churches have to worship in "compounds" designated for them and can, at any time, have their property and their rights to worship confiscated. No one should have to live in that situation.
I agree with TheCabbie that more people within Muslim countries know what is going on than we believe in the West. Pakistan is a perfect example. There Musharaff has been able to turn in hundreds of Al Qaeda operatives by going house to house and finding them. Why has that not happened anywhere else (though we know these guys are all over the Middle East, Asia and Chechnya)? I believe it is because in every other Muslim country (apart from perhaps the Emirates) the leadership sympathizes with the terrorists at least to a certain degree. They feel torn between their political duties to the world and their sectarian duties to other Muslims and fear social backlash. They also know, as I have said, that the violent actions of the terrorists are completely consistent with the religion itself--so the terrorists are doing "nothing wrong".