Cyprus-Forum.com

[repulsewarrior]

My personal "conspiracy theory" is the one most common in this business: arson, the owners did it; can you imagine the time and cost of demolishing these buildings 'by the book', otherwise?

But if it wasn't for all the other attacks my opinion would be worth consideration.

...or do you think that men in such a position wouldn't bat an eye if it solved "Their" problem?

[Robin Hood]

My personal "conspiracy theory" is the one most common in this business: arson, the owners did it; can you imagine the time and cost of demolishing these buildings 'by the book', otherwise?

But if it wasn't for all the other attacks my opinion would be worth consideration.

...or do you think that men in such a position wouldn't bat an eye if it solved "Their" problem?

I think you are very much on target. But even if it was the owners it was one hell of a project to plan without being exposed. So 'assistance' from the 'Deep State' has to be considered as that sort of influence can only come from the highest levels of The State .... don't you think?

[Kikapu]

My personal "conspiracy theory" is the one most common in this business: arson, the owners did it; can you imagine the time and cost of demolishing these buildings 'by the book', otherwise?

But if it wasn't for all the other attacks my opinion would be worth consideration.

...or do you think that men in such a position wouldn't bat an eye if it solved "Their" problem?

I think you are very much on target. But even if it was the owners it was one hell of a project to plan without being exposed. So 'assistance' from the 'Deep State' has to be considered as that sort of influence can only come from the highest levels of The State .... don't you think?

The owner of the WTC buildings 1 & 2 Larry Silverstein got more than $4 Billion dollars insurance payment few years after the buildings came down. Insurance companies are not known to make payments to arsonists owners!

[Londonrake]

My personal "conspiracy theory" is the one most common in this business: arson, the owners did it; can you imagine the time and cost of demolishing these buildings 'by the book', otherwise?

But if it wasn't for all the other attacks my opinion would be worth consideration.

...or do you think that men in such a position wouldn't bat an eye if it solved "Their" problem?

I think you are very much on target. But even if it was the owners it was one hell of a project to plan without being exposed. So 'assistance' from the 'Deep State' has to be considered as that sort of influence can only come from the highest levels of The State .... don't you think?

The owner of the WTC buildings 1 & 2 Larry Silverstein got more than $4 Billion dollars insurance payment few years after the buildings came down. Insurance companies are not known to make payments to arsonists owners!

I suspect RW was tongue-in-cheek, rather than “very much on target” (poor pun).

So. “The Deep State” emerges as a suspect?

Have I got this right? Shadowy elements of the USG/Military/Security Services conspired with Islamist terrorists in a plot to destroy what were probably the most potent symbols of America’s global financial power? In the process killing 3000 of their own citizens. A plot which has been kept a closed secret for a remarkable 22 years? I imagine none of them were in the Pentagon or Capitol that day. I wonder why they did it?

[Robin Hood]

My personal "conspiracy theory" is the one most common in this business: arson, the owners did it; can you imagine the time and cost of demolishing these buildings 'by the book', otherwise?

But if it wasn't for all the other attacks my opinion would be worth consideration.

...or do you think that men in such a position wouldn't bat an eye if it solved "Their" problem?

I think you are very much on target. But even if it was the owners it was one hell of a project to plan without being exposed. So 'assistance' from the 'Deep State' has to be considered as that sort of influence can only come from the highest levels of The State .... don't you think?

The owner of the WTC buildings 1 & 2 Larry Silverstein got more than $4 Billion dollars insurance payment few years after the buildings came down. Insurance companies are not known to make payments to arsonists owners!

I suspect RW was tongue-in-cheek, rather than “very much on target” (poor pun).

So. “The Deep State” emerges as a suspect?

Have I got this right? Shadowy elements of the USG/Military/Security Services conspired with Islamist terrorists in a plot to destroy what were probably the most potent symbols of America’s global financial power? In the process killing 3000 of their own citizens. A plot which has been kept a closed secret for a remarkable 22 years? I imagine none of them were in the Pentagon or Capitol that day. I wonder why they did it?

If you have nothing to add to the discussion but your unsupported opinion …….. don’t post! You get boring after a while!

As usual a fully negative post, laced with sarcasm and centered on your personal opinion of content provided by others!

[cyprusgrump]

My personal "conspiracy theory" is the one most common in this business: arson, the owners did it; can you imagine the time and cost of demolishing these buildings 'by the book', otherwise?

But if it wasn't for all the other attacks my opinion would be worth consideration.

...or do you think that men in such a position wouldn't bat an eye if it solved "Their" problem?

I think you are very much on target. But even if it was the owners it was one hell of a project to plan without being exposed. So 'assistance' from the 'Deep State' has to be considered as that sort of influence can only come from the highest levels of The State .... don't you think?

The owner of the WTC buildings 1 & 2 Larry Silverstein got more than $4 Billion dollars insurance payment few years after the buildings came down. Insurance companies are not known to make payments to arsonists owners!

A good point well made!

I think it is fair to say that with $4 Billion Dollars on the table the Insurance company were pretty much convinced that what we all watched unfold on TV was what actually happened - not some bizarre unexplainable conspiracy theory...

[Londonrake]

If you have nothing to add to the discussion but your unsupported opinion …….. don’t post! You get boring after a while!

As usual a fully negative post, laced with sarcasm and centered on your personal opinion of content provided by others!

I’ve upset you. Oh dear, what a pity, never mind. 2/10, must try harder.

I’m sure I’ve added a reasonable share to the “discussion”. Some of it in the form of asking you sensible questions about your theory (see, I never said conspiracy there). Ignored of course. You seldom venture out of your comfortable “bubble” (MO 1/2?). Understandable, as when you (rarely) do it shows just how myopic your view of 9/11 is.

Isn’t the “Deep State” thing unsupported opinion? Ridiculous, with more holes than a colander

As far as boring goes, I’d be very surprised if the reams of technical stuff you insist on posting - 5/8” bolts - hasn’t helped any insomniacs out.

[Robin Hood]

If you have nothing to add to the discussion but your unsupported opinion …….. don’t post! You get boring after a while!

As usual a fully negative post, laced with sarcasm and centered on your personal opinion of content provided by others!

I’ve upset you. Oh dear, what a pity, never mind. 2/10, must try harder.

I’m sure I’ve added a reasonable share to the “discussion”. Some of it in the form of asking you sensible questions about your theory (see, I never said conspiracy there). Ignored of course. You seldom venture out of your comfortable “bubble” (MO 1/2?). Understandable, as when you (rarely) do it shows just how myopic your view of 9/11 is.

Isn’t the “Deep State” thing unsupported opinion? Ridiculous, with more holes than a colander

As far as boring goes, I’d be very surprised if the reams of technical stuff you insist on posting - 5/8” bolts - hasn’t helped any insomniacs out.

I repeat ......... If you have nothing to add to the discussion but your unsupported opinion …….. don’t post!
I repeat ......... As usual a fully negative post centered on your personal opinion of content provided by others!

[cyprusgrump]

I repeat ......... If you have nothing to add to the discussion but your unsupported opinion …….. don’t post!

Perhaps you should take your own advice...?

That could be the response to every single one of your tedious posts on the subject...

[Londonrake]

I repeat ......... If you have nothing to add to the discussion but your unsupported opinion …….. don’t post!
I repeat ......... As usual a fully negative post centered on your personal opinion of content provided by others!

Just thought of that being said in a Dalek voice. So funny!

You've never mastered the art of stopping digging, have you?

Unsupported though? That seems a bit unfair.

I posted a whole page (and could have more) of links supporting the fact that there are more 9/11 Conspiracy Theories than you can shake a stick at. In a moment of weakness I thought it would stop you from being lonely and also show that there's nothing original in your particular one. Doesn't seem to be much in the way of revelations from people actually involved in blowing up the WTC towers though. Perhaps they've all died of old age.

cyprus48655-60.html#p937899

Any thoughts yet on the Who? Why? How? aspects. I'm all ears.