Cyprus-Forum.com

by **Lordo** » Mon Mar 13, 2023 12:39 am

The ultimate question in life is in any situation is International law Broken or not and if yes, who is the biggest culprit on earth.

Perhaps watching to this war monger may open some eyes and ears. In good time we can go back in the more recent history and examine it. We need not go back any further than WW2. There are plenty of examples in here.

Perhaps this can remains a bit more civilised when compared with other threads.

by **Londonrake** » Mon Mar 13, 2023 11:49 am

Can always tell when it’s “back of the net”. You feel compelled to raise a thread on the matter (it’s called digging a bigger hole). Just like the 2019 UK election debacle. You know, when you disappeared for a year. Until the months of dust you’d kicked up before it settled. One of your first efforts after you quietly slipped back on the forum late one night was to raise a thread on it. :lol:

It’s simple really. You can’t lecture piously about International Law, in relation to the UK migrant issue, whilst glibly cheering the Russians on in Ukraine - and retain credibility. :wink:

All of your Whataboutism doesn’t cloud the hypocrisy involved.

by **Lordo** » Mon Mar 13, 2023 1:43 pm

Oh dear, oh dearie me. I think we have already established the matter of 2019. I opened a thread and you being the coward that you are avoided it. Be that as it may.

Be gone ol man.

How does what this old warmonger says fit with international law.
As a matter of interest why has USA not signed up to International Criminal Court?

by **Lordo** » Mon Mar 13, 2023 1:55 pm

Anyyyyyyyyyway

Back to Yankee understanding of international law
First one is the overthrow of Iranian elected Prime Minister replaced by Shah with CIA and MI5/MI6.

Now was this according to International Law? UN was fully functioning and yet they did nothing to prevent it or remedy it. The reason is obvious, the Shah stopped the Nationalisation of BP in Iran which gave the Swine free had at stealing Iranian oil.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d%27%C3%A9tat

by **Lordo** » Mon Mar 13, 2023 1:59 pm

The second incident is actually the one time the the Yankees were on the side of the International Law. Israel, France and the Brits decided to gang up against Nasser and topple him and the Yankees put a stop to it.

So, so far it is 1-1 with America.

https://www.britannica.com/event/Suez-Crisis

by **Londonrake** » Mon Mar 13, 2023 2:03 pm

Lordo wrote:Oh dear, oh dearie me. I think we have already established the matter of 2019. I opened a thread and you being the coward that you are avoided it. Be that as it may.

Be gone ol man.

Coward?

Cowads run away. In your case for a year. :wink:

I’m pretty sure I gave as good as during the campaign. Raising a thread about the issue 12 months later was pointless. Other than perhaps as therapy for you. The decision was made - about as graphically as possible - Corbyn an historical anomaly. It was just a case of letting you go play with yourself and your comforting conspiracy theories. :wink:

Have to say, a highlight of that “debate” for me was your indignation when Corbyn got taken to task about his lack of action against anti-semitism in the Party. You were incensed.

That, to be followed a little later by your saying you wished HMS Belfast would turn its guns on the nearest Jewish quarter ( apparently, I’m the Fascist :lol:

). A classic.

Your usual reversion to an anti-US diatribe is an attempt at distraction and - as always - courting favour. Your hypocrisy regarding International Law though a recent forum matter.

Stop digging. :wink:

by **Lordo** » Mon Mar 13, 2023 2:11 pm

I notice you are unable to make one post about the subject.
Say something, say info on Iran or Egypt is wrong, tell me it was all within international law. Tell me something.

Cause if you don't, I will tell you something.

Be gone ol man.

by **Londonrake** » Mon Mar 13, 2023 2:22 pm

A well known quality of “Swines” from “Swineland” is……………. their stubbornness. :eyecrazy:

Cut out the racist slurs and I’ll ignore you. Just like others do. Well, not all of the time. That would be asking too much. :wink:

by **Lordo** » Mon Mar 13, 2023 2:23 pm

Are you saying the Swine are not racist? Is that your understanding?

by **Londonrake** » Mon Mar 13, 2023 2:51 pm

Lordo wrote:Are you saying the Swine are not racist? Is that your understanding?

Perhaps, if you called people or organisations by what they are? Rather than your tediously interminable obsession with pigs. It might avoid any misunderstanding? Nothing to stop you adding your favourite expletives of course. You know “Tory bastards” “BBC cunts” that sort of thing. I’m not holding my breathe though.

In the absence of that I can say I definitely regard you as one. Despite all your attempts at obfuscating BS you’ve regularly referred to my country/people as “Swineland/Swines” for 20 months now. That’s about as racist as it gets. :evil: