Cyprus-Forum.com

[Paphitis]

Merika just surfaced 3 ICBM Submarines in Meditteranean just to show its ICBMs are on your doorstep wuith a flight time of 25 minutes.

25 minutes is very slow Paphitis... they're called subsonic.

It's not slow.

BTW, did you know the worlds fastest missile is actually a joint US and Australian Cruise missile, already in testing apparently.

Mach 8 - hypersonic.

And a range of over 3000 kms and precision guided.

[Paphitis]

Merika just surfaced 3 ICBM Submarines in Meditteranean just to show its ICBMs are on your doorstep wuith a flight time of 25 minutes.

25 minutes is very slow Paphitis... they're called subsonic.

They are not subsonic.

3500 kms at 25 minutes is not subsonic.

It's over 7500km/hr

And subsonic doesn't mean inferior. Tomahawk is subsonic but also flies so low with terrain following radar it doesn't matter.

Same as the terrain following radar of the F111 and Tornadoes.

Ruzzia has nothing like it. It's Cruise Missiles were 2000ft high where as a Tomahawk hugs the earth at 100ft

And btw, did you know Mach Number is affected by temperature and air density altitude? No you didn't know such a thing. So Mach 1 in Australia is entirely different to Mach 1 in Ruzzia and Mach 1 is entirely different at Sea Level to Mach 1 at 50000 feet. Do you have the brains to work out how and why?

it's very easy to spout the lingo and use jargon like Mach Number, but you do not even know what it is apart from in layman's terms of speed of sound. Well my friend, speed of sound is not a constant.

[Get Real!]

Incoming subsonics and supersonics is exactly what the S-400 was deigned to catch.

[Paphitis]

Incoming subsonics and supersonics is exactly what the S-400 was deigned to catch.

S400 don't work, and return like boomerangs back onto their launcher.

Look, that bubble burst a long time ago.

The Air Defence kings are the west. we never knew it till now, but now we know.

Nothing is better than Nassam, IRIS T, Iron Dome, Patriot, Aspide, and Crotale.

When you can't even shoot down a Ukrainian Drone with S400, there is buckleys chance in hell of getting an ICBM.

[Get Real!]

Incoming subsonics and supersonics is exactly what the S-400 was deigned to catch.

S400 don't work, and return like boomerangs back onto their launcher.

Look, that bubble burst a long time ago.

The Air Defence kings are the west. we never knew it till now, but now we know.

Nothing is better than Nassam, IRIS T, Iron Dome, Patriot, Aspide, and Crotale.

When you can't even shoot down a Ukrainian Drone with S400, there is buckleys chance in hell of getting an ICBM.

The S-400 missiles are too large and expensive for drones… it was designed to intercept cruise missiles, incoming nukes, and all that serious shit.

The best and cheapest weapon for all those little drones in use these days, are the good old AAAs and heavy machine guns.

[Paphitis]

Incoming subsonics and supersonics is exactly what the S-400 was deigned to catch.

S400 don't work, and return like boomerangs back onto their launcher.

Look, that bubble burst a long time ago.

The Air Defence kings are the west. we never knew it till now, but now we know.

Nothing is better than Nassam, IRIS T, Iron Dome, Patriot, Aspide, and Crotale.

When you can't even shoot down a Ukrainian Drone with S400, there is buckleys chance in hell of getting an ICBM.

The S-400 missiles are too large and expensive for drones… it was designed to intercept cruise missiles, incoming nukes, and all that serious shit.

The best and cheapest weapon for all those little drones in use these days, are the good old AAAs and heavy machine guns.

Not too large or expensive when the drone is a kamikaze headed for an ammunition dump or fuel storage.

The truth is, they are incapable.

And it not stopping Ruzzia using its extremely expensive Cruise missiles which it has vitually almost run out of now and can't build anymore in any usefull numbers becayse no more US Made chips and boards.

and who cares about cost? Have you ever thought about the morale cost of even one strike on Ruzzian territory, which Ukraine has pulled off countless times now?

You are in a bad spot. Every Cruise Missile strike on Kyiv, only strengthens Ukrainian resolve and morale. Every Ukrainian strike on Ruzzia, destroys Ruzzian resolve and morale. A bit of an anomoly, but it's a true anomoly.

[Paphitis]

Incoming subsonics and supersonics is exactly what the S-400 was deigned to catch.

S400 don't work, and return like boomerangs back onto their launcher.

Look, that bubble burst a long time ago.

The Air Defence kings are the west. we never knew it till now, but now we know.

Nothing is better than Nassam, IRIS T, Iron Dome, Patriot, Aspide, and Crotale.

When you can't even shoot down a Ukrainian Drone with S400, there is buckleys chance in hell of getting an ICBM.

The S-400 missiles are too large and expensive for drones… it was designed to intercept cruise missiles, incoming nukes, and all that serious shit.

The best and cheapest weapon for all those little drones in use these days, are the good old AAAs and heavy machine guns.

Soon enough, there will be NATO troops in Ukraine to mop every shit stain ruzzian up. The Nuclear Deterrance value is in decline.

[Pyrpolizer]

Soon enough, there will be NATO troops in Ukraine to mop every shit stain ruzzian up. The Nuclear Deterrance value is in decline.

This should wake you up.

NATO DOESN'T HAVE ANYTHING CAPABLE OF DOING ANYTHING IN UKRAINE.

It will only take you 1 minute to get educated about the details at this exact time frame.-->>


https://youtu.be/ei2AoIToiIw?t=5849

[Londonrake]

Soon enough, there will be NATO troops in Ukraine to mop every shit stain ruzzian up. The Nuclear Deterrance value is in decline.

This should wake you up.

NATO DOESN'T HAVE ANYTHING CAPABLE OF DOING ANYTHING IN UKRAINE.

It will only take you 1 minute to get educated about the details at this exact time frame.-->>


https://youtu.be/ei2AoIToiIw?t=5849

Wow. Sorry, but that's just some bully boy ranting. Ritter, and people like Noam Chomsky (there are many others) are well-known useful idiots. Making a name for themselves in a Social Media enabled niche market. Ego - and opinion prevail.

It's surely a reflection of the tolerance and confidence of the West that such people are allowed to promulgate their views unimpeded? How do you think they would fair in Russia? That side of the equation never gets addressed though of course but we all know the answer. Else, ask people like Navalny. If you can get visitation rights.

Moreover, unless Putin does something incredibly stupid - although, I concede he has form in that area and is clearly under some pressure - NATO are not going to get involved in large scale combat ops in Ukraine. It's a fantasy. First you have to consider that (like the fallacy of Ukraine membership) all 30 members have to sign up to such a thing. Can you imagine the likes of Turkey and Hungary doing that? Let alone Germany and France.

Sorry, but I can't see anything educational in that video of Ritter's views. Because that's all it basically comes down to. Boomingly.

[Pyrpolizer]

Soon enough, there will be NATO troops in Ukraine to mop every shit stain ruzzian up. The Nuclear Deterrance value is in decline.

This should wake you up.

NATO DOESN'T HAVE ANYTHING CAPABLE OF DOING ANYTHING IN UKRAINE.

It will only take you 1 minute to get educated about the details at this exact time frame.-->>


https://youtu.be/ei2AoIToiIw?t=5849

Wow. Sorry, but that's just some bully boy ranting. Ritter, and people like Noam Chomsky (there are many others) are well-known useful idiots. Making a name for themselves in a Social Media enabled niche market. Ego - and opinion prevail.

It's surely a reflection of the tolerance and confidence of the West that such people are allowed to promulgate their views unimpeded? How do you think they would fair in Russia? That side of the equation never gets addressed though of course but we all know the answer. Else, ask people like Navalny. If you can get visitation rights.

Moreover, unless Putin does something incredibly stupid - although, I concede he has form in that area and is clearly under some pressure - NATO are not going to get involved in large scale combat ops in Ukraine. It's a fantasy. First you have to consider that (like the fallacy of Ukraine membership) all 30 members have to sign up to such a thing. Can you imagine the likes of Turkey and Hungary doing that? Let alone Germany and France.

Sorry, but I can't see anything educational in that video of Ritter's views. Because that's all it basically comes down to. Boomingly.

My post was addressed to Paphitis -not you- and i provided the exact timeline to watch a 1 minute part of it.That''s because it clearly answers to Paphitis' dreams. You seemingly having watched nothing came to the same conclusion as the video did anyway, albeit for the wrong reasons.

You dared called Noam Chomsky a useful idiot??? Maybe you should think for yourself. Then you are comparing the impact of those people who are actually sidelined with that of MSM!!?? That would make a perfect useful idiot.

And yes such opposing however sidelined views function freely in Russia. What do you think channel 1420 on youtube that RW posts all day does?

As for Navalny , you should actually spin your brain a bit and explain how on earth he was evacuated to Germany after presumably having been poisoned. Do you have to be a rocket scientist to realize he was a foreign agent all along?