Papadopoulos made a speech while in Finland, at the country's most renoun think tank. He said that for us the best solution is the one my government is striving for and the next best is the current situation, that is, as you say, partition. If this is what you beleive too, then go on, support Papadopoulos till death.
I didn't listen to his speech in Finland. But if he said that I agree, but I would put it differently:
The minimum acceptable solution is what we are striving for. If that minimum can not be achieved now, then between the current situation (= the illegal partition) and something like the Annan plan (=legal and permanent partition) we prefer the current situation.
So there are three things: 1)current situation 2)minimum acceptable solution 3)not acceptable solution.
What is 2 and 3 is decided not by Piratis or Bananiot alone, but democratically from all of us together. So if we can not get 2 now, what is the option?
Do we have any other option apart from trying to achieve 2? Isn't number 1 the only thing we can have until 2 is achieved?