Bananiot wrote: Taking your government to court is no treason. It happens all the time in civilised societies.
Did I say that act alone is treason?
Treason is to take your government at court, knowing in advance that you are wrong, knowing in adsvance that you will lose, just to help OTHERS who are already stabbing your country push the knife a little deeper.
An equal case of treason would be if the leader of the biggest party in Iraq would go to the UN and present fabricated photographs of nuclear bombs allegedely stored in some places in Bagdat just to help the Americans get the UN OK for attacking.That leader is not just anybody.He is somebody he is the leader of the biggest party in Iraq so his word (in this case his lies) have
exceptional weight Bananiot wrote: Anastasiades was a bomb victim following his intention to file the law suit.
Ha,ha,ha, yeah right..... Piratis answered you very well on that already.
Metecyp wrote: So what? If that was indeed the case, that is if there was really massive misinformation, then wouldn't you like to know? Even if you believe that wasn't true, he thought so and he wanted the truth to come out, so he filed a law suit. What's wrong with that?
For the "so what"please refer to my answer above.Anastasiades is not just a simple unknown person.What he does counts, and has exceptional weight.
About the misinformation:I happen to live here my friend.Cyprus is not Turkey is not the USA. Cyprus is a small place everybody knows each other, news and events don't hide that easily. Each TV channel had an average of 4 hours live discussions every night, (we have 5 major stations) each radio channel had about the same hours and we have about 100 stations, nobody was excluded from the discussions, all debates had people from both sides, not to mention the newspapers and other media.The information was so massive and complete
NOBODY can say that he was carried away by anyone. And nobody can say he did not hear about an equal volume of arguments for a YES or for a NO. May i quote you what my father in law told me one day.He was a very simple man. "I hear them advocating "yes" I say they are right, then I hear the others advocating "No" I say they are right, then i hear again those advocating "yes" I say they are right, then I hear the others advocating "No" I say they are right too. I don't know what to vote...."
In this respect I can tell you for sure that the ones who were actually missinformed about the Anan Plan were the TCs. I personally witnessed TCs discussing in forums who much to my surprise did not even know the most sounding anomalities of the Anan Plan as for example the donation of sea shell rights to the British.
About whats wrong with that: I already replied that the action by itself is not an act of treason. What makes it a treason is a combination of events: a)It's timing and the real scope behing it b)the fact that it was made by an important person without even getting the approval of the high ranking members of his party c)The fact that all his allegations were based on remote incidents or on lies d)the fact that he did not let his suit be judged. All these 4 things sum up to one:
THE REASON why the suit was made. I will give you another example. Suppose your house gets burned one of your kids die and you have nowhere to stay.The house is not even insured and the death of your child is unbearable.A neighbour Your neighbour with whom you were always friends and whom you helped many times in the past, works at an Insurance company but never managed to sell you an insurance. That guy goes to the police and says he saw you holding a petrol lamp and entering the basement a few days ago. The police then arrests you as a suspect for homocide, despite your yelling that you never even had a petrol lamp, but an electric one. Anyway finally the neighbour drops his case saying he is not sure. Is that neighbour a traitor of your friendship yes or no?
Metecyp wrote: Legal punishment for what? For trying to find the truth? Since when filing a suit against your country is a crime?
Re metecyp do we understand each other or not? I said the fact IS, he did not receive any legal pubnishment.The reason is not because he is not a traitor! The reason is because his treason was hidden under the veil of "justice or truth". That's why I said "So if the word ‘traitor" is not appropriate, find me another suitable word to use. "
Metecyp wrote: He took the government to the court because he believed that the government massively misinformed people and that's it. Whether you agree with him or not is your personal decision but you cannot claim that he tok the majority of GCs to the court.
But thats the whole point.There would be no suit if the result of the referendum was what Mr Anastasiades wanted.What he was trying to prove is that the Government exercised terrorism to have that result.And the people knew that was a lie.If it was not a lie then Anastasiades would not be the only one to sue the Government!
He did it to supplement the arguments of the foreigners especially the Americans. Do you know that even the words the Americans were using were a direct word-by-word translation of Anastasiades sayings?
Metecyp wrote: Anastasiades used force to get what he wanted?
Have you ever heard a tiger roaring? Thats Anastasiades. And yes Anastasiades uses either verbal or physical force to prevail.Never you heard that he throws ashtrays to his MPs at his party meetings when they disagree with him? Never you heard that he expelled almost half his party leaders? He is a phenomenon beleive me. What Sampson was once doing with the power of guns, he does it today with other means.
And a final note: I am not a supporter of any Cypriot politician, because all of them are crooks to some degree.(I actually beleive in some elements of the anarchic ideology). But I really never saw such a huge demostration of crookiness, like that of Anastasiades...