Metecyp wrote: If the RC exists and if the GCs are present in the RC, then GCs *cannot* use the nonexistance of TCs as an excuse to do whatever they like such as using Greek national anthem with the RC flag.
I think everybody here me included agreed this is wrong. I even went along and said what I expect in the future. I also asked a question that nobody answered me so far and I think it is important to know the answer if we are going to have a meaningful discussion. I repeat it:
The 1960 constitution did not mention anything about the National anthem. Please correct me if I am wrong. Yet from 1960-1963 that the TCs were in the Republic Denktash never vetoed the use of this anthem. And no Tc complained. Why? How did the Greek National Anthem become official.
By the way did you hear the national anthem chosen during the Anan Plan? It is really moving, It really touched me.Excellent! I think Turker even made it a Nokia tune in this forum.
Metecyp wrote: I'm going to be honest with you. What you said has some truth in it but it's not the whole truth. There are many TCs that will be more willing and assertive to return back to the RC (or at least some federated form of it) if they are given the right message from the Republic of Cyprus.
That's encouraging. Like you said in previous posts (or was it Mehmet who said that) there are only a few alternatives left. The other one being partition...About the "right message": The best one would be to offer the TCs government jobs. But then I wonder how can this be done while the division continues? In fact due to this situation even the RoC acts in a way that looks "hostile" to the TCs. As for example the free trade with EU and the economic measures. On one hand it has to protect her existence, on the other she cannot help without at the same time legalising the occupation....
Metecyp wrote: So you're saying that since TCs don't revolt against the occupation, the RC cannot exist as it is supposed to be and it will stay like a Hellenic Cyprus Republic until a solution is found.
Here I disagree on two things. First to the statement that the RoC is not as it should be.If you have a look at the Anan Plan those 20,000 pages of laws were by 99% laws of the RoC and were all accepted! And I ask, would they were accepted if they were not the laws they should be?
The second part I disagree is this Hellenic CR. Like I said before the RoC is one thing and the GC community another. In fact inside the GC community there are Armenians, Maronites and Latins. You cannot call the RoC a Hellenic state because it has almost nothing in common with the real Hellenic State (Greece).You cannot imagine how many administrative differences we have with Greece. Our legal system our governing system almost everything here is British, and completely different from the Greek ones. Here we have permanent Government employees, there when Pasok gets the power most government directors lose their jobs and get replaced by affiliated to Pasok directors.Even our accounting system, nobody goes to Greece to study Accountancy because their system is completely different. Most of the education however is based on Greek books.For important lessons though, like Maths Physics Chemistry etc our books are written by Cypriots and follow the GCE syllabus.But anyhow even this, is not against the 1960 constitution, remember education was the responsibility of the communities in the 1960 constitution not of the state. I would need to write a book to prove that this "hellenisation of the RoC" statement is mostly invalid.What is needed is the other community to come in to eradicate the few things we slipped out. That's all...