Pyrpolizer wrote:Londonrake wrote:Pyrpolizer wrote:Oh please stop this tune. Even in courts of law where each case is examined on it's own, the lawyers are allowed to call previous similar or related cases to make their point.
So stop dictating the rules, your rules are invalid.
No, it's not.
There's been a continual trend in this thread by people (you know who your are ) to divert attention away from the central issue - the unprovoked invasion by Russia of a neighbouring country - towards totally unrelated events in other countries at other times. That, accompanied by the introduction of what's little more than conspiracy theories about similar. It's all presented in a manner which suggest that Russia's actions are acceptable because A did B to C back in D. It's bullshit. Russia has sent 190,000 troops into a neighbouring country where it's been slaughtering the population and destroying it's cities for the past 3 weeks. There is nothing which justifies that and to attempt to do so by any BS examples is despicable.
Listen mate. You should contact GR and find out how to block me. Because, apparently, this sort of post on my part is just some sort of annoying thread diversionary thing.
Well, you may continue dictating your own terms, but I guarantee you will be wasting your time.
Is that not what the winners normally do, dictate the terms of peace?
Otherwise this will go on forever.
You would think people would learn from other people's mistakes when it comes to war at least. Hitler made the same mistake as Napoleon invading Russia before the onset of winter with exact same result.
Same as Cyprus, we could have had peace back in 1974 with no settlers but it was not to be.
If they do not want to divide Ukraine into two BBF is the only answer.