Pyrpolizer wrote:More information about the cancelling of the 'secret" meetings in Egypt.
I personally think that's only part of the truth.
https://t.me/rybar/41606
translation:
What do foreigners think about START negotiations?
The other day it became known that the meeting of the Advisory Commission on the Treaty on the Reduction of Strategic Offensive Arms, which was to be held in Cairo in the period November 29-December 6, was postponed indefinitely at the request of the Russian side.
▪️In the Western media, versions immediately appeared that Russia was disrupting the only remaining nuclear deterrence treaty and provoking a new escalation.
▪️According to the channel Donbass (https://t.me/DonbassDevushka/34591) Devushka (https://t.me/DonbassDevushka/34591), many media are silent that after the appearance of hypersonic weapons in Russia, the main goal of the White House in negotiations on START is to achieve access to Russian military installations and resume inspections.
▪️At the same time, Russia's questions about the illegal exclusion from the count of categories and families of weapons that fall under the START criteria are not taken into account.
Here is what colleagues from the @sitreports channel write (https://t.me/sitreports/1395) about specific positions that were excluded by the US decision without any legal grounds and coordination with Russia:
➖ 56 Trident-2 SLBM launchers. The US claims to have made them "unlaunchable". Russia was not given the opportunity to test this directly;
➖ 41 B-52H heavy bombers. The US claims they were "converted to a non-nuclear version" using procedures not agreed upon with Russia;
➖ 4 mines for ICBMs. The US claims these are "training facilities" and refers to them as "training mines," a term not covered by the START treaty.
▪️Given that such face-to-face consultations are always preceded by correspondence, the Russian side concluded that Washington is not ready to discuss anything other than its own interests.
▪️Vietnamese channel Quan (https://t.me/quantin_vic/27332) Tin (https://t.me/quantin_vic/27332) notes that the postponement of the meeting is not a violation of the agreement. Russia shows a tough stance, but still shows a certain openness, subject to due attention to questions from the Russian side.
▪️American military expert Brian (https://t.me/brianlovethailand) Berletic (https://t.me/brianlovethailand) recalls that the United States has repeatedly violated various agreements regarding strategic weapons or the nuclear industry, for example, with the USSR or Iran. Therefore, this time too it is difficult to expect that Washington will make any concessions in search of a compromise.
▪️German colleagues from the Ubersicht channel (https://t.me/Ubersicht_Ukraine_Kanal/21229) Ukraine (https://t.me/Ubersicht_Ukraine_Kanal/21229) add that the United States not only violated the provisions of the START, but also, apparently, carry out a nuclear modernization program.
In particular, according to the Spanish channel Vakulinchuk (https://t.me/vakulinchuk/3543), the Americans have already accelerated the deployment of B61-12 tactical nuclear bombs at their bases in Europe.
▪️Italian colleagues Rosella (https://t.me/RossellaFidanza/33122) Fidanza (https://t.me/RossellaFidanza/33122) and @ (https://t.me/italiazforzaverita/10391)italiazforzaverita (https: //t.me/italiazforzaverita/10391) draw attention to the fact that Europeans should be more worried about American bases with nuclear weapons and medium and short range missiles. Their presence only contributes to tension between Russia and the United States and makes European countries hostage to the confrontation.
▪️American journalist Fiorella (https://t.me/fiorellastele/3302) Isabelle (https://t.me/fiorellastele/3302) believes that Russia is already making concessions, supporting the negotiation process at the same time when The United States allocates another tranche of aid to Ukraine.
▪️Finally, the French channel Actualite (https://t.me/actualiteFR/18992) expressed the opinion that any progress on key negotiations is hardly possible before the completion of the NWO.
We are talking about a new configuration of European and world security, which will emerge as a result of the conflict. This means that in the near future we will have to revise many treaties, including START, in which the United States has already lost interest.
ÇF é ÇF é„ ÇFœ ë{j hD féƒ ƒùuw·@ ÿþÿÿƒø w`ÿ$…|? fÇF* ëLÇF ëCÇF& ë:ÇF ë1ƒf ë+j h fë6j hÀ fë-j hx fë$j h0 fëÇF °^Ãj hð fëj h¸ fè-Y 2À^ËÿE> f}> f‰> f÷> f}> f•> f¡> f÷> f÷> f÷> f> fÜ> få> fî> f÷> f ? f? f? f? f!? f*? fÌÌÌÌÌ‹ÿU‹ìQQSV‹ñ‹F,‹Nf‹@f‰Ä ‹N,·3ÛCf;Ãutfƒyuf‹F(ƒ¸ž u ¹ f9ˆ¢ uf9˜¤ u‹Fƒ` ‹F(9˜ž u1f9˜¢ u(·€¤ f;Ãtfƒøt fƒøtfƒøu
‹F‹@ƒ` ‹Ãé ƒy „ƒ ‹V(¸ Wyf9‚¢ …« f9š¤ …ž ‹I…ÉuQh fëfEøPEüPQjBè` „Àu#j hà fèÑW ‹
(À fjXf‰Ä ‹Ãé ‹F,ÿpWÿuøèî „Àu j h¬ fëÿuüè
„Àu j hx fè†W ÌÌÌÌÌ‹ÿU‹ìƒìt¡À f3ʼnEüSV‹u ‹Ù3ÀW‹}9C„ü ¹ f9Mu9C…è ÇC ë‰CjkPˆEE‘Pè7c ƒÄ E…ÿu'…öuhø fjlPè—ùÿÿëZÿ6Ɔ› ƒÆzVhÜ fëƇ› …öuÿ7ƒÇzWhÀ fjlPèöùÿÿƒÄë#ÿ6Ɔ› ƒÆzVÿ7ƒÇzWh fjlPèÑùÿÿƒÄ …ÀŒN ‹KEPèz# h” f¾ { VWÆ èùÿÿ‰EŒ…ÀŒ ‹ÏAŠA„Òuù+È¿ÿ ‹Çf9Et A;Æs‹Æ+ÁPÿuD P‹ËèÁùÿÿ‰EŒƒ}Œ ŒÝ K AŠA„Òuù+È‹Çf9Et A;Æs‹Æ+ÁPÿuD P‹Ëèÿùÿÿ‰EŒƒ}Œ Œž K AŠA„Òuù+È‹Çf9Et A;Æs‹Æ+ÁPÿuD P‹Ëè-ûÿÿ‰EŒƒ}Œ |cK AŠA„Òuù+Èf9} t<A;Îs7hŒ fVC PèYøÿÿ…À|6C xŠ@„Éuù+Ç+ðVÿu D P‹Ëè<üÿÿ‰EŒƒ}Œ | ‹KC Pè8" ‹Mü_^3Í[èHa É ÌÌÌÌÌ‹ÿU‹ìV‹ñè®# öEtVè6 Y‹Æ^] ÌÌÌÌÌ‹ÿU‹ìV‹ñèj öEtVè Y‹Æ^] ÌÌÌÌÌ‹
,À f…Étjè£ÿÿÿƒ%,À f ‹
