The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Ukrainian Issue

Everything related to politics in Cyprus and the rest of the world.

Re: Ukrainian Issue

Postby Pyrpolizer » Sat Mar 05, 2022 3:22 pm

Get Real! wrote:Cyprus rejects 5 Russian ships needing port services…

https://www.philenews.com/eidiseis/poli ... kon-ploion

The way things are going we’re gonna start feeding on garden weed and dog-shit here in Cyprus!

* We use to trade with Syria… they got trashed by the criminal US and others.

* We used to trade with Libya… they too get trashed by the US.

* We used to trade with the Lebanon and all this calamity fell upon them and it stopped.

* We convinced a handful of wealthy Russians to invest some cash here in return for a lousy passport… No get rid of them!

* We used to get some Russian tourists… they’re banned!

Ok Einsteins… how is Cyprus supposed to make a fucking living anymore?

At moments like this I’d like to ring that Vasilliou’s neck who got us into this shitty EU mess! :?


I think it's all about how they are going to pay us for the fuel. :wink:

Like every whore Cyprus never refuses to open her legs to anyone, be it Israelis, American, French, Russians. But she has to make sure she will get paid
Last edited by Pyrpolizer on Sat Mar 05, 2022 3:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Pyrpolizer
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12893
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 11:33 pm

Re: Ukrainian Issue

Postby Oceanside50 » Sat Mar 05, 2022 3:25 pm

Where does Cyprus get it’s spare parts for the 500 T80U, TORM1..2, BTR etc, now that Russian flights have been banned.???
Oceanside50
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2296
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 5:45 pm

Re: Ukrainian Issue

Postby Paphitis » Sat Mar 05, 2022 4:50 pm

Pyrpolizer wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
And back to reality we crash.

What do you think the reality of all that is with the Russian military unable to move as they are stuck waiting for the next Javelin to hit them?



Ts, ts, ts... Do you think this javelin is the ultimate weapon ? All armies have similar launchers including Cyprus. For a start you should learn the order by which military deployment occurs.
The Tanks never enter a war zone unless the area has been cleared up by Airforce/Seaforce or artillery. The Tanks also play a similar role like the artillery however their effective range is smaller and they are more suited for direct shelling rather than artillery's elliptic kind of bombing. The artillery can do direct shelling too, but it takes them too long compared to the tanks.
These javelins have an effective range of 2.5Km FCS... So all the Russian artillery (effective range from 10-50 Km) has to do is just clean up an area of only 2.5Km to turn the javelins ineffective.
These weapons like lots and lots of others are only suitable for street war or at best some close proximity - direct vision (upto 2.5KM) unguarded tanks.
How long did you say you served in the military? :lol: :lol: :lol:


Many wars have that killer weapon, depending on the type of warfare being waged. For example, during the Falklands war, the Argentine Mirages were ripped a new asshole by British harrier Jets.

Similarly, Pootin has decided to invade with thousands of Tanks and Armoured vehicles, but the Ukrainians jave Javelins.

Would have been great to see some NATO A-10s as well but alas.

Actually, I do not advocate unnecessary killing and I do have a heart for the Russian soldiers stuck in limbo on highways with nowehere to go. Ideally, I would like them to live but they are invaders of Ukraine and Ukraine is going to have to do what's necessary to defend their country.

The best thing the Russians can do is either surrender or turn back - but they don't even have fuel for that...
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: Ukrainian Issue

Postby Paphitis » Sat Mar 05, 2022 5:02 pm

Get Real! wrote:The hypocritical EU’s “love affair” with the Ukraine is well and truly over!

The rallies, speeches, flags and ribbons have all gone and now there’s over a million extra refugees in Europe with the highest numbers in Poland.

Even the faggot Zelensky has done a runner all the way to the US embassy in Poland prioritizing his safety.

The criminal yanks abandoned ship long ago while the criminal Brits have settled into propaganda overdrive!

And here in CY we’re knocking back business we can’t afford because the EU says so!

As if the stupid EU would ever know if you were to serve those ship and make some much needed cash… but in place of a penis, Nikos has a vagina!


Nope! Zalensky is still in Kiev. No runner here, just Russian propaganda and lies.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: Ukrainian Issue

Postby Paphitis » Sat Mar 05, 2022 5:04 pm

Pyrpolizer wrote:
Get Real! wrote:Cyprus rejects 5 Russian ships needing port services…

https://www.philenews.com/eidiseis/poli ... kon-ploion

The way things are going we’re gonna start feeding on garden weed and dog-shit here in Cyprus!

* We use to trade with Syria… they got trashed by the criminal US and others.

* We used to trade with Libya… they too get trashed by the US.

* We used to trade with the Lebanon and all this calamity fell upon them and it stopped.

* We convinced a handful of wealthy Russians to invest some cash here in return for a lousy passport… No get rid of them!

* We used to get some Russian tourists… they’re banned!

Ok Einsteins… how is Cyprus supposed to make a fucking living anymore?

At moments like this I’d like to ring that Vasilliou’s neck who got us into this shitty EU mess! :?


I think it's all about how they are going to pay us for the fuel. :wink:

Like every whore Cyprus never refuses to open her legs to anyone, be it Israelis, American, French, Russians. But she has to make sure she will get paid


Face iot boys! Cyprus is only doing what's right and standing uo for international law and the teritorial integrity of a fellow sovereign state.

Cyprus has joined most of the world and condemned Russia's criminal actions and has sanctioned Russia like the rest of us.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: Ukrainian Issue

Postby Pyrpolizer » Sat Mar 05, 2022 5:13 pm

Paphitis wrote:
Pyrpolizer wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
And back to reality we crash.

What do you think the reality of all that is with the Russian military unable to move as they are stuck waiting for the next Javelin to hit them?



Ts, ts, ts... Do you think this javelin is the ultimate weapon ? All armies have similar launchers including Cyprus. For a start you should learn the order by which military deployment occurs.
The Tanks never enter a war zone unless the area has been cleared up by Airforce/Seaforce or artillery. The Tanks also play a similar role like the artillery however their effective range is smaller and they are more suited for direct shelling rather than artillery's elliptic kind of bombing. The artillery can do direct shelling too, but it takes them too long compared to the tanks.
These javelins have an effective range of 2.5Km FCS... So all the Russian artillery (effective range from 10-50 Km) has to do is just clean up an area of only 2.5Km to turn the javelins ineffective.
These weapons like lots and lots of others are only suitable for street war or at best some close proximity - direct vision (upto 2.5KM) unguarded tanks.
How long did you say you served in the military? :lol: :lol: :lol:


Many wars have that killer weapon, depending on the type of warfare being waged. For example, during the Falklands war, the Argentine Mirages were ripped a new asshole by British harrier Jets.

Similarly, Pootin has decided to invade with thousands of Tanks and Armoured vehicles, but the Ukrainians jave Javelins.

Here we go again... Like I said the Javelins is mainly an anti-tank weapon with maximum effective range of 2.5 Km. The situation on the ground in Ukraine makes them useless unless the Russiands decide to enter a street war- which they will never do. The thousands of Tanks you see in the media are just waiting for artillery to clear up the way. The media can't get near artillery or or rocket launchers that do the clearing up that's why you don't even see them. All you have to do is Google search how much artillery and rocket launchers Russia uses in this operation.
Here's one:

https://abcnews.go.com/International/wi ... r-83247881

Would have been great to see some NATO A-10s as well but alas.

Actually, I do not advocate unnecessary killing and I do have a heart for the Russian soldiers stuck in limbo on highways with nowehere to go. Ideally, I would like them to live but they are invaders of Ukraine and Ukraine is going to have to do what's necessary to defend their country.

The best thing the Russians can do is either surrender or turn back - but they don't even have fuel for that...
User avatar
Pyrpolizer
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12893
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 11:33 pm

Re: Ukrainian Issue

Postby Paphitis » Sat Mar 05, 2022 5:19 pm

Pyrpolizer wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
Pyrpolizer wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
And back to reality we crash.

What do you think the reality of all that is with the Russian military unable to move as they are stuck waiting for the next Javelin to hit them?



Ts, ts, ts... Do you think this javelin is the ultimate weapon ? All armies have similar launchers including Cyprus. For a start you should learn the order by which military deployment occurs.
The Tanks never enter a war zone unless the area has been cleared up by Airforce/Seaforce or artillery. The Tanks also play a similar role like the artillery however their effective range is smaller and they are more suited for direct shelling rather than artillery's elliptic kind of bombing. The artillery can do direct shelling too, but it takes them too long compared to the tanks.
These javelins have an effective range of 2.5Km FCS... So all the Russian artillery (effective range from 10-50 Km) has to do is just clean up an area of only 2.5Km to turn the javelins ineffective.
These weapons like lots and lots of others are only suitable for street war or at best some close proximity - direct vision (upto 2.5KM) unguarded tanks.
How long did you say you served in the military? :lol: :lol: :lol:


Many wars have that killer weapon, depending on the type of warfare being waged. For example, during the Falklands war, the Argentine Mirages were ripped a new asshole by British harrier Jets.

Similarly, Pootin has decided to invade with thousands of Tanks and Armoured vehicles, but the Ukrainians jave Javelins.

Here we go again... Like I said the Javelins is mainly an anti-tank weapon with maximum effective range of 2.5 Km. The situation on the ground in Ukraine makes them useless unless the Russiands decide to enter a street war- which they will never do. The thousands of Tanks you see in the media are just waiting for artillery to clear up the way. The media can't get near artillery or or rocket launchers that do the clearing up that's why you don't even see them. All you have to do is Google search how much artillery and rocket launchers Russia uses in this operation.
Here's one:

https://abcnews.go.com/International/wi ... r-83247881

Would have been great to see some NATO A-10s as well but alas.

Actually, I do not advocate unnecessary killing and I do have a heart for the Russian soldiers stuck in limbo on highways with nowehere to go. Ideally, I would like them to live but they are invaders of Ukraine and Ukraine is going to have to do what's necessary to defend their country.

The best thing the Russians can do is either surrender or turn back - but they don't even have fuel for that...


Russians have no choice but to enter into a street war if they want Ukraine. After they fuekl their armour, if any of them will be left by then.

Right now, the Russians aren't going anywhere.
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: Ukrainian Issue

Postby Pyrpolizer » Sat Mar 05, 2022 5:40 pm

Paphitis wrote:
Pyrpolizer wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
Pyrpolizer wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
And back to reality we crash.

What do you think the reality of all that is with the Russian military unable to move as they are stuck waiting for the next Javelin to hit them?



Ts, ts, ts... Do you think this javelin is the ultimate weapon ? All armies have similar launchers including Cyprus. For a start you should learn the order by which military deployment occurs.
The Tanks never enter a war zone unless the area has been cleared up by Airforce/Seaforce or artillery. The Tanks also play a similar role like the artillery however their effective range is smaller and they are more suited for direct shelling rather than artillery's elliptic kind of bombing. The artillery can do direct shelling too, but it takes them too long compared to the tanks.
These javelins have an effective range of 2.5Km FCS... So all the Russian artillery (effective range from 10-50 Km) has to do is just clean up an area of only 2.5Km to turn the javelins ineffective.
These weapons like lots and lots of others are only suitable for street war or at best some close proximity - direct vision (upto 2.5KM) unguarded tanks.
How long did you say you served in the military? :lol: :lol: :lol:


Many wars have that killer weapon, depending on the type of warfare being waged. For example, during the Falklands war, the Argentine Mirages were ripped a new asshole by British harrier Jets.

Similarly, Pootin has decided to invade with thousands of Tanks and Armoured vehicles, but the Ukrainians jave Javelins.

Here we go again... Like I said the Javelins is mainly an anti-tank weapon with maximum effective range of 2.5 Km. The situation on the ground in Ukraine makes them useless unless the Russiands decide to enter a street war- which they will never do. The thousands of Tanks you see in the media are just waiting for artillery to clear up the way. The media can't get near artillery or or rocket launchers that do the clearing up that's why you don't even see them. All you have to do is Google search how much artillery and rocket launchers Russia uses in this operation.
Here's one:

https://abcnews.go.com/International/wi ... r-83247881

Would have been great to see some NATO A-10s as well but alas.

Actually, I do not advocate unnecessary killing and I do have a heart for the Russian soldiers stuck in limbo on highways with nowehere to go. Ideally, I would like them to live but they are invaders of Ukraine and Ukraine is going to have to do what's necessary to defend their country.

The best thing the Russians can do is either surrender or turn back - but they don't even have fuel for that...


Russians have no choice but to enter into a street war if they want Ukraine. After they fuekl their armour, if any of them will be left by then.

Right now, the Russians aren't going anywhere.


Right, they have no choice. That much you know that much you tell. you forgot to include Russia's surrender in your options. :lol: :lol: :lol:
your extreme cognitive bias gets worse and worse... :(
User avatar
Pyrpolizer
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 12893
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 11:33 pm

Re: Ukrainian Issue

Postby Paphitis » Sat Mar 05, 2022 5:44 pm

Pyrpolizer wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
Pyrpolizer wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
Pyrpolizer wrote:
Paphitis wrote:
And back to reality we crash.

What do you think the reality of all that is with the Russian military unable to move as they are stuck waiting for the next Javelin to hit them?



Ts, ts, ts... Do you think this javelin is the ultimate weapon ? All armies have similar launchers including Cyprus. For a start you should learn the order by which military deployment occurs.
The Tanks never enter a war zone unless the area has been cleared up by Airforce/Seaforce or artillery. The Tanks also play a similar role like the artillery however their effective range is smaller and they are more suited for direct shelling rather than artillery's elliptic kind of bombing. The artillery can do direct shelling too, but it takes them too long compared to the tanks.
These javelins have an effective range of 2.5Km FCS... So all the Russian artillery (effective range from 10-50 Km) has to do is just clean up an area of only 2.5Km to turn the javelins ineffective.
These weapons like lots and lots of others are only suitable for street war or at best some close proximity - direct vision (upto 2.5KM) unguarded tanks.
How long did you say you served in the military? :lol: :lol: :lol:


Many wars have that killer weapon, depending on the type of warfare being waged. For example, during the Falklands war, the Argentine Mirages were ripped a new asshole by British harrier Jets.

Similarly, Pootin has decided to invade with thousands of Tanks and Armoured vehicles, but the Ukrainians jave Javelins.

Here we go again... Like I said the Javelins is mainly an anti-tank weapon with maximum effective range of 2.5 Km. The situation on the ground in Ukraine makes them useless unless the Russiands decide to enter a street war- which they will never do. The thousands of Tanks you see in the media are just waiting for artillery to clear up the way. The media can't get near artillery or or rocket launchers that do the clearing up that's why you don't even see them. All you have to do is Google search how much artillery and rocket launchers Russia uses in this operation.
Here's one:

https://abcnews.go.com/International/wi ... r-83247881

Would have been great to see some NATO A-10s as well but alas.

Actually, I do not advocate unnecessary killing and I do have a heart for the Russian soldiers stuck in limbo on highways with nowehere to go. Ideally, I would like them to live but they are invaders of Ukraine and Ukraine is going to have to do what's necessary to defend their country.

The best thing the Russians can do is either surrender or turn back - but they don't even have fuel for that...


Russians have no choice but to enter into a street war if they want Ukraine. After they fuekl their armour, if any of them will be left by then.

Right now, the Russians aren't going anywhere.


Right, they have no choice. That much you know that much you tell. you forgot to include Russia's surrender in your options. :lol: :lol: :lol:
your extreme cognitive bias gets worse and worse... :(


Do they want to take the capital or not?

Just today, the Russians did enter the port city and were repelled. They had to withdraw.

What else =di they come for?

And you speak about my cognitive bias. What about yours? What about your cognitive bias and support of an illegal invasion into the sovereign State of Ukraine. I mean how hypocritical can you get?
User avatar
Paphitis
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 32303
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 2:06 pm

Re: Ukrainian Issue

Postby Maximus » Sat Mar 05, 2022 7:45 pm

I dont support the invasion, but I can tell you, western societies are morally bankrupt Paphitis.

By and large, we have extreme cognitive bias and on the world stage, we dont play by the rules.

Condaleeza rice was being interviewed by US media about a week ago and she agreed that invading a country is wrong, no matter what the justification.

But because Russia is doing it, and not the US and most people in the west wouldnt even be aware that she and they, undermine their own righteousness. :roll:
Maximus
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7587
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 7:23 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Politics and Elections

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests