Interesting stuff about a captured Russian T-90M Proryv tank.
https://mil.in.ua/en/news/ukraine-s-arm ... iv-region/
.
Kikapu wrote:Londonrake wrote:Kikapu wrote:Londonrake wrote:I personally doubt there was any expectation of actually destroying the bridge.
Yes, my mistake.
I thought it a reasonable discussion. Why resort to a cherry pick and mickey taking?
Constructs like bridges tend to be easy to damage but much more difficult to destroy. Particularly when so closely guarded.
Either way, it doesn't really matter though - and you're avoiding the main point.
The very fact that such an iconic construct, which bears a very close personal association with Putin and is an embodiment of Russia's commitment to making the Crimea part of the Motherland - not to mention nowadays its strategic importance - has been subjected to such an attack is highly significant. No matter how things are spun it's clearly a slap in the face humiliation for the man. Especially when added to recent events on the battlefield. It all adds to the mix of problems Putin's dealing with at the moment.
I agreed with your whole post LR minus the comment that you did not believe the bridge was not meant to be destroyed completely.
My sarcasm was only based on that.
Get Real! wrote:It all comes down to this premise:
If you nuke small/smaller nations the whole world will turn against you, but if you nuke America most of the world will applaud you.
>> © Never-Ending Links - Sponsored by ELENI the cheap whore of Stroumbi <<
Kikapu wrote:Paphitis wrote:Kikapu wrote:Paphitis wrote:Kikapu wrote:Paphitis, can you with a straight face tell us that this scene is not an orchestrated Ukrainian Bull Shit propaganda?
This was even on major news network!
Yes I can tell you with a straight face.
It is very clear that some Ruzzians are surrendering after they call a Government Hotline - where they are given instructions on how to surrender and where to surrender and how to position their guns, vehicles and tanks to avoid any misunderstanding or mishap.
Whether you believe that is a staged production or not makes no difference to me. It looks very legitimate to me, but you can please yourself.
What you should be asking is WHY Ruzzians have low morale and WHY they may wish to surrender. If I was in their boots, I would be surrendering too. And there are many reasons for that. They simply don't have the will to give up their lives for Oligarch privilege when they don't even have good and proper kit, food or clean water.
An Army marches on its stomach. When the Ukrainians are eating ice-cream and cake in their ditches, that tells you everything you need to know. Supply lines dude, equipment and kit.
So, you cannot vouch for the authenticity of this particular video, especially since the faces of the supposedly Russian tank crew were never shown close up.
You know very well that the scheme the Ukrainian Government doesn't allow to show the faces of Ruzzian Soldiers, especially if the Ruzzian Soldiers opt for a prisoner exchange - they will go to jail for 15 years.
If these Ruzzian Soldiers become Ukrainians, then I am sure you will get interview videos later on. But in the mean time, the Ruzzian Soldiers have surrendered and need protections. Ukraine can't undermine that because if they do, no other Ruzzians will surrender.
Yes, very convenient for Ukraine not to give the staged game away by using the cop out explanation which you gave.
Paphitis wrote:Maybe if they are Chechnyan,...
Get Real! wrote:Unable to have their way on the battlefield, the Anglo-Americans have gradually resorted to terrorist acts against Russian infrastructure such as underwater gas pipelines, now the Crimean bridge and others before it, and not forgetting the totally senseless killing of a famous Russian citizen’s daughter.
The "Anglo-Americans" aren't on the battlefield. Which it seems anyway to most people here on Earth - unlike your relentless "great news from the Russian army troll factory" daily output - seem to think hasn't exactly been going Putin's way recently.
As far as "terrorist acts" are concerned either you're confused or taking the piss. Putin sent near 200,000 professional troops across the border into Ukraine 8 months ago, where they've since killed thousands, flattened large swathes of cities, towns and villages and sent millions fleeing into the uncertainty of homelessness (remember that?) or refugee destitution. So, come again about "terrorist acts".
So everything leads in one direction... the eventual Russian retaliation which will not be pleasant.
Well, we're getting there perhaps. Your sermons about Armageddon toned down. By "retaliation" though I assume you mean your oft expressed desire to see a nuclear holocaust.
The only question is.... will the Russians be smart enough to avoid striking anything in or around Europe and go for the root of the problem, or screw up?
Trust me. If Russia starts throwing nuclear weapons around it will be a screw up for humanity.
That decision is what will determine the outcome of this whole debacle.
Yes - that decision would.
If Russia makes the wrong nuclear move they're fucked, and if not the world will be theirs.
I really don't know what it takes to convince you, that the scenario you seem so ardently to desire would mean that the world you refer to - the one left, with hundreds of millions dead, millions set to die from radiation and billions starving, would be straight out of Dante. What on Earth goes on in that head of yours? Clearly, you are not a family man, nor one who troubles himself with the teachings of Jesus Christ.
If - as a token of wanting this forum to return to a semblance of normality - you dropped the deliberately provocative signature and blocked Milti we might perhaps all get on with the normal business of routinely slagging each other off.
Return to Politics and Elections
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests