Cyprus-Forum.com

[Paphitis]

Can I ask the Pootin apologists what is wrong with Ruzzians. Apart from their filth, they seem to be alcoholic and bumbling idiots. Where were they when God was handing out brains?

I mean, we talk about beer swiggling Aussies, Brits, Germans and Irish but good lord, those Ruzzians are just dumb dumb dumb.

They are literally legless. One Ruzzian Soldier was hobbling towards the Ukrainian lines, holding Russian Flag, vodka and AK47. I mean seriously people. He is now a Ukrainian sunflower.

Did you see all the protests in Ruzzia. Looks like most Ruzzians are smart enough to realize Pootin is trying to commit genocide against his own people, sending his opponents and minorities to the front lines to die.

Conscripts should take the first opportunity to surrender to the Ukrainian Military. There, they will be assured to maintain their lives and survive.

Ruzzia in turmoil bitches.

And you all think Ruzzia is going to use a tactical nuclear weapon. Go for it bitches. It will be the end of Pootin. Ruzzians are not known for their intelligence.

[repulsewarrior]

...all the cards are falling on the table; this is good, it means there is little else to discuss.

Great things are to come. Imagine a world with the Problem solved; this is possible.

...i am hopeful.

[Paphitis]

Let’s just explore what consequences Russia would face from the collective West should Russia use tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine as America is warning Russia that there will be consequences.

Will there be more sanctions or will there be a nuclear response against Russia?

Personally, the collective West will not stick their necks out for Ukraine by firing nukes at Russia because there will be a retaliation and which country would suffer the most economically should that happen, Russia getting nuked or the country who had dared to nuke Russia? The answer should be self evident I would imagine, therefore, the nuclear option against Russia for the collective West is out of the question, which gives Russia a free hand to nuke Ukraine should it come to that. There will be other consequences for Russia, but being nuked by the collective West is not one of them, and Zelensky knows it too well, which is why he is in a panic mode.

Pretty much what this article is saying:

https://warnews247-gr.translate.goog/mi ... x_tr_hl=en

What makes you think Ruzzia is even capable of launcing a tactical nuke?

They have run out of modern day T-80 tanks. Their so called 22000 tanks are mostly in an ill state of repair and don't even work. They really only had 3000 to 5000 in working order and they have lost over 2000 in Ukraine. Plus donated another 400 to the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

Their Air Force is AWOL as they have lost over 220 aircraft and they can't replace them. Every plane lost is irreplaceable due to the embargo. Ukraine has total air dominance. Ruzzian Luftwaffe is nowhere to be seen.

So at this point, what makes you even so sure that Ruzzia is even capable of using a Tactical Nuke?

[repulsewarrior]

"They", all have palaces, after all.

[Get Real!]

It appears that some nigger has stolen Paphitis’ laptop and is logging on here...

[Pyrpolizer]

The latest news:

-France's 2023 budget deficit covered through debt 270 billion, the highest in it's history. As Macron already said the French should kiss goodbye the good old days. Imagine what will happen in Germany. Italy's new Government is also about to clash with the EU wanting to renegotiate it's dept (to IMF?). "FonderLiner" is threatening the new government...

-M16 says Russia will hit various targets in Ukraine using tactical nuclear weapons.Mainly roads away from residential areas used for the transfer of American weapons. Most of them lead to Poland and pass through Lviv. It won't be sudden though. Russia will provide indications

--And finally a cateau to General Paphitis who a week ago said he will come back in 3 days to rub our noses for the "liberation" of Kherson.

https://warnews247-gr.translate.goog/sk ... r_pto=wapp

[Lordo]

The latest news:

-France's 2023 budget deficit covered through debt 270 billion, the highest in it's history. As Macron already said the French should kiss goodbye the good old days. Imagine what will happen in Germany. Italy's new Government is also about to clash with the EU wanting to renegotiate it's dept (to IMF?). "FonderLiner" is threatening the new government...

-M16 says Russia will hit various targets in Ukraine using tactical nuclear weapons.Mainly roads away from residential areas used for the transfer of American weapons. Most of them lead to Poland and pass through Lviv. It won't be sudden though. Russia will provide indications

--And finally a cateau to General Paphitis who a week ago said he will come back in 3 days to rub our noses for the "liberation" of Kherson.

https://warnews247-gr.translate.goog/sk ... r_pto=wapp

In 2021, the national debt of France amounted to around 2.9 trillion U.S. dollars.
France GDP The Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in France was worth 2937.47 billion US dollars in 2021

In 2021, Germany's gross domestic product (GDP) amounted to 3,570.62 billion euros
national debt of Germany from 2017 to 2021, with projections up until 2027. In 2021, the national debt of Germany amounted to around 2,633.61 billion U.S. dollar

Now there's a healthy economy. Perhaps this is the reason the Yanks wanted a war in Ukraine to apply sanctions to Russia and increase the German debt.

2022, the public debt of the United States was around 30.6 trillion U.S. dollars and their GDP was around 21.5 trillion.

[Pyrpolizer]

If Ruzzia use a nuclear weapon, it will be to their detriment. They will be a Pariah for the next 50 years. It can't be compared to Japan at all. The Allies then were only seeking a Japanese surrender to end WW2 and did not want to invade Japan. So this was the only way.

You see Paphitis, you are making excuses to the collective West in their justification for nuking Japan twice, a civilian targets each time no less, because it would save lives of the allied forces had the war continued, and if the aim is to end the war by nuking the opposition, then surely under your own reasoning in using nukes can be justified, then surely Russia using nukes in Ukraine would also end the war and saving thousands of lives from both sides, no?

The west isn't required to justify anything. The response from the west has already been justified and it is just a response to an illegal invasion of a sovereign country and member of the United Nations.

The west has not invaded anyone, or acted illegally.

The collective west sees the invasion of Ukraine as no different to the invasion of Poland by Hitler, and it is an event which will either create dire consequences for the globe. In any event, threats of Nuclear War are completely meaningless. The western military doctrine when dealing with dangerous tyrants like pootin, is that the west makes a stand in Ukraine, to prevent future disasters for Poland, Moldova, Finland, and the Baltics. Ukraine now is the defence line for Europe at large. So now we are in a game of poker. And the collective west and NATO are calling to see Pootin's hand. If worse comes to worse, Russia will be gambling with the existence of Ruzzia at large.

For the last 20 years, the West has given Pootin the benefit of doubt. But now, those days are over.

As for nuking Japan, the choices were clear. Either nuke Japan, and cause Japan to surrender, or invade them, have war for many more years to come, which Japan would have a good chance of winning, but losing even more civilians.

Neither the US, Australia, or Britain would have had the appetite for continued war.

Let me ask you a question. Why did they nuke Japan, and not Germany which was the root of the problem? I 'd bet you don't know.

Ask away. Unlike you, I'm only too happy to answer questions.

There are many reasons. Not least of which Fat Man wasn't ready till late July 1945, a project led by Physicist Oppenheimer from the University of California. Germany had surrendered by 30th of April, 1945. It was already occupied by allied troops.

In addition, Germany was already backs to the wall and losing by that stage prior to their surrender, with their forces in retreat and allied forces closing in from France and from the East (Ruzzians).

There was no need to use a Nuclear Weapon on Germany. It's far too destructive on an enemy already in a state of total collapse, where their defeat was imminent and assured.

Japan on the other hand was in retreat in the Pacific. But there were no allied troops in Japan itself. The Americans were already dictating the war and well in control, but to force a surrender, the allies (US, UK and Australia) were contemplating a costly D Day style landing in Japan. You could imagine the losses there. And I actually believe Japan would have defeated the Allies guaranteed. Japanese do not surrender easily. One thing you can say about the Japanese is that you would prefer to face the NAZI Germans any day than face the Japanese, and in their own country within their own borders, well it would not have been very nice.

I have a lot of time for the Japanese. I do not support or take any delight in having their cities nuked. Despite the fact that they were a WW2 enemy to Australia, and the fact thousands of Australian POWs were killed, tortured and starved by them. Yes animosity. But I respect them as a people and a culture. I've witnessed them as a people to know their strengths. Something I can't bring myself to do with regard to the filthy Ruzzian scum. Yes, Japanese people are superior to Ruzzians. I truly believe this to be true. Cleaner and far more sophisticated at all levels and superior intelligence as well. I respect that a lot.

You can never meet a more thoughtful and composed race of people, rich in culture and tradition.

To cut a long story short, the reason why Japan was nuked during WW2 was to hasten their surrender without necessitating a full scale invasion of Japan. It was deemed far less costly in terms of losses, especially of our own troops.

No that was not the reason. In fact there was no reason to nuke Japan at all, because it was already defeated. It would collapse and surrender any time having lost all it's naval and Air capability, via simple allied naval and air blockade, lack of resources etc. The excuse for the nukes was always to save lives assuming there would be an invasion in Japan. No such invasion was necessary. Try again.

[DT.]

I remember being on a bus from Paphos to Nicosia a few years ago. I was surrounded by Ruzzians. I only made it to Yeroskipou.

As we were driving along, their smell and the heat was affecting me. I yelled out to the bus driver to stop the bus. I only just made it out puking my breakfast. The bus driver was waiting for me to re- enter and I said, sorry, I'm staying here. Walkked to the taverna, about 1 km down the road, sat down to have some refreshments, called a taxi and continued my journey.

I'll never forget that.

I have never see a more filthier people. I swear that guy next to be never showered for 2 weeks. Putrid!

And that cold stoney look on their faces and beady eyes. There is something not quite right. Can't put my finger on it.

Who takes a bus in Cyprus? And from Paphos???

[Get Real!]

I remember being on a bus from Paphos to Nicosia a few years ago. I was surrounded by Ruzzians. I only made it to Yeroskipou.

As we were driving along, their smell and the heat was affecting me. I yelled out to the bus driver to stop the bus. I only just made it out puking my breakfast. The bus driver was waiting for me to re- enter and I said, sorry, I'm staying here. Walkked to the taverna, about 1 km down the road, sat down to have some refreshments, called a taxi and continued my journey.

I'll never forget that.

I have never see a more filthier people. I swear that guy next to be never showered for 2 weeks. Putrid!

And that cold stoney look on their faces and beady eyes. There is something not quite right. Can't put my finger on it.

Who takes a bus in Cyprus? And from Paphos???

A stingy backpacker.