Londonrake wrote:Pyrpolizer wrote:Londonrake wrote:Either way, it smells like desperation but sounds as though it won’t change the way the Ukrainians are prosecuting the war.
And how does it smell to you like when the Americans are currently "planning" to provide the Ukrainians with hundreds of modern Tanks, and F-16 fighter jets? Who is the desperate one here breaking all red lines, pushing their luck to the limit?
Jam tomorrow then.
GR shows us daily that the Ukrainians are losing vast amounts of equipment and men. Tens of thousands apparently. That, whilst the Russian Forces increasingly go from strength to strength.
Shoigu announced today the official number of Russian dead in the Ukraine Special Military Operation to be 5397.
Why then the need to mobilize and - for the umpteenth time - threats from Putin & Co about their willingness to use nuclear weapons?
Lordo wrote:This mobilisation may not actually be just for Ukraine. It is for all those in the area who wish to join Nato.
Pyrpolizer wrote:
You haven't answered the main question. Why are the Americans escalating the conflict by been the ONLY country that will provide Ukraine with hundreds of modern tanks even F-16 risking getting nuked themselves? Do you have any doubt that such a move will cross all red lines for Russia?
So who is CURRENTLY so desperate of losing everything on the first place? Isn't it America? And what is that "everything" they will lose? That should be enough to spin your thinking.
Londonrake wrote:Pyrpolizer wrote:
You haven't answered the main question. Why are the Americans escalating the conflict by been the ONLY country that will provide Ukraine with hundreds of modern tanks even F-16 risking getting nuked themselves? Do you have any doubt that such a move will cross all red lines for Russia?
So who is CURRENTLY so desperate of losing everything on the first place? Isn't it America? And what is that "everything" they will lose? That should be enough to spin your thinking.
As is so often the case. The discourse of the deaf.
Putin’s in trouble - now - his army has significant problems, but he can never acknowledge anything which hints at defeat. Even partial. Not least because his most loyal supporters would eat him alive.
Your point about weapon systems is nothing new and it remains to be seen just who would actually end up delivering what/when. It’s a non-sequitur/distraction from today’s important issue. More desperation.
Today Putin publicly announces the mobilization of 300,000 reservists and reiterates his willingness to use nuclear weapons in defence of Mother Russia. That, whilst adding, after sham, illegal, positive annexation referendums in seized Ukrainian territory he would regard them as part of the Homeland. Ipso facto, if the Ukrainians continue efforts to take back their land he will feel fully justified in using nuclear weapons in defence of “Russia”. These are indisputable facts, widely and publicly reported.
Yet, you insist the US, who haven’t committed or lost any troops in Ukraine, are responsible for this escalation - presumably with a straight face - and question my thinking.
You don’t comment on Shoigu’s clearly ludicrous claim of only 6000 Russian dead. Perhaps you believe him? Why not? You’ve regularly believed other fairy stories about this conflict. Nor do you tell us why - GR’s showing us daily for 7 months how much the Russian army has ground down the Ukrainians - mobilization and more nuclear threats have suddenly become necessary.
It’s a mystery apparently.
Pyrpolizer wrote:Londonrake wrote:As is so often the case. The discourse of the deaf.
Putin’s in trouble - now - his army has significant problems, but he can never acknowledge anything which hints at defeat. Even partial. Not least because his most loyal supporters would eat him alive.
Your point about weapon systems is nothing new and it remains to be seen just who would actually end up delivering what/when. It’s a non-sequitur/distraction from today’s important issue. More desperation.
Today Putin publicly announces the mobilization of 300,000 reservists and reiterates his willingness to use nuclear weapons in defence of Mother Russia. That, whilst adding, after sham, illegal, positive annexation referendums in seized Ukrainian territory he would regard them as part of the Homeland. Ipso facto, if the Ukrainians continue efforts to take back their land he will feel fully justified in using nuclear weapons in defence of “Russia”. These are indisputable facts, widely and publicly reported.
Yet, you insist the US, who haven’t committed or lost any troops in Ukraine, are responsible for this escalation - presumably with a straight face - and question my thinking.
You don’t comment on Shoigu’s clearly ludicrous claim of only 6000 Russian dead. Perhaps you believe him? Why not? You’ve regularly believed other fairy stories about this conflict. Nor do you tell us why - GR’s showing us daily for 7 months how much the Russian army has ground down the Ukrainians - mobilization and more nuclear threats have suddenly become necessary.
It’s a mystery apparently.
1st paragraph: You seem to know everything. Probably you are a mouse inside Kremlin hearing and knowing everything.
2nd paragraph: Obviously you don't follow the news, about what the Pentagon is "considering".
.....
The rest is just about the same nonsense. Not worthy of wasting my time.
Btw are you trying to write poetry or is that a deliberate effort to make yourself incomprehensible?
Return to Politics and Elections
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests