Londonrake wrote:Incredibly, Vladimir Putin - a single man - has been solely responsible for bringing about the deaths of tens of thousands of Russians and Ukrainians in the past 140 days.
Get Real! wrote:Londonrake wrote:Incredibly, Vladimir Putin - a single man - has been solely responsible for bringing about the deaths of tens of thousands of Russians and Ukrainians in the past 140 days.
That's just YOUR stupid interpretation, but intelligence isn't your strong point... especially when you've got severe hypocrisy oozing out of every orifice!
Londonrake wrote:Get Real! wrote:Londonrake wrote:Incredibly, Vladimir Putin - a single man - has been solely responsible for bringing about the deaths of tens of thousands of Russians and Ukrainians in the past 140 days.
That's just YOUR stupid interpretation, but intelligence isn't your strong point... especially when you've got severe hypocrisy oozing out of every orifice!
From the man who left - seeking “Mature debate”?
Get Real! wrote:Londonrake wrote:Get Real! wrote:Londonrake wrote:Incredibly, Vladimir Putin - a single man - has been solely responsible for bringing about the deaths of tens of thousands of Russians and Ukrainians in the past 140 days.
That's just YOUR stupid interpretation, but intelligence isn't your strong point... especially when you've got severe hypocrisy oozing out of every orifice!
From the man who left - seeking “Mature debate”?
Look, we’ve already heard your stupid ideas and they’ve been rejected.
Londonrake wrote:Get Real! wrote:Londonrake wrote:Get Real! wrote:Londonrake wrote:Incredibly, Vladimir Putin - a single man - has been solely responsible for bringing about the deaths of tens of thousands of Russians and Ukrainians in the past 140 days.
That's just YOUR stupid interpretation, but intelligence isn't your strong point... especially when you've got severe hypocrisy oozing out of every orifice!
From the man who left - seeking “Mature debate”?
Look, we’ve already heard your stupid ideas and they’ve been rejected.
The ole "we" again.
It's an aspect of "mature debate" - you have a big problem with - that people tend to exchange differing views.
You though have - and never have had - absolutely any interest at all in anybody else's views, if they're not in agreement with - or supportive of - your own.
Tough.
Get Real! wrote:What do you know about "mature debate" when you come up with sweeping statements like “solely responsible”?
Not even the West’s most die-hard propaganda authors have ever claimed such one-sided trash!
You probably look at American politicians and see dazzling halos around their heads!
How fucking biased and/or naïve can one possibly be?
Go back to sleep!
Londonrake wrote:Get Real! wrote:What do you know about "mature debate" when you come up with sweeping statements like “solely responsible”?
Not even the West’s most die-hard propaganda authors have ever claimed such one-sided trash!
You probably look at American politicians and see dazzling halos around their heads!
How fucking biased and/or naïve can one possibly be?
Go back to sleep!
Ut repetere.
You don’t engage in debate. You never have. You have 2 modes, broadcasting, accompanied by hundreds of links, as often as not from highly questionable sources. Or piss taking ridicule. Ipso facto, with a signature When your views are challenged you descend, knee jerk-like into the forum equivalent of a hissy fit. Throwing childish insults around like chaff. Wait - no - three. There’s the posting of nonsense about your desire to see a nuclear war and Christian beliefs. Now, there’s an oxymoron.
If you treated people with a modicum of respect you might be surprised. It would certainly improve the general tone of the forum and perhaps encourage others to participate. Not I suspect that’s something you particularly want.
Return to Politics and Elections
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests