Londonrake wrote:Get Real! wrote:Londonrake wrote: Sorry. That's total BS.
Day 93.
And the Russian army is "the best in the world"? Russia a "superpower"? I don't think so.
But why are you in such a hurry?
By comparison, didn’t I already mention that it took the British forces 1.5 months to liberate a rock off the coast of Argentina that is about the size of 5 football fields, and in the process lost half their navy?
Ahhh - a Lordo-ism.
The Falklands were 8000 miles away from the UK. That, across the full length of the Atlantic by ship. They are about 5000 square miles in size. Not "5 football fields".
Ukraine is literally just next door to that great superpower Russia. You could roll a tank across it in a few days (although, that didn't work out for them of course).
1.5 months is 6 weeks. 8000 miles away. The Russian "Special military operation" is now in it's 4th month and ongoing, with considerably reduced objectives and (unacknowledged of course) eye watering losses of manpower and materials.
The RN lost 5 ships in the war. Not "half the navy".
Argentina was subsequently rid of a fascist, military dictatorship which had murdered 30,000 of it's own people. The "disappeared". Well, people much like you actually.
You really need to do a bit of research on these things GR.
Heaven forbid!
Lordo wrote:What kind of weapons did America supply UK.
Kikapu wrote:Lordo wrote:What kind of weapons did America supply UK.
At least 100 sidewinders UK begged the US for, which eventually got them.
By late April Argentina had stationed approximately 10,000 troops on the Falklands, although the vast majority of these were poorly trained conscripts, and they were not supplied with proper food, clothing, and shelter for the approaching winter.
Lordo wrote:Fuckin hell man you need some help.
You take the distance between the countries and you conclude Britain did better on those grounds. And there I was thinking you understand war.
Lets look at the differences.
The size of the country
How many soldiers actually landed from Argentina?
What kind of arms did they have to defend themselves with?
Did Argentina actually believe that UK would put up a fight.
Who backed UK with all the satellite information.
What kind of weapons did America supply UK.
Fucking hell man what the hell is going on here?
Get Real! wrote:By comparison, didn’t I already mention that it took the British forces 1.5 months to liberate a rock off the coast of Argentina that is about the size of 5 football fields, and in the process lost half their navy?
Lordo wrote: And there I was thinking you understand war.
Londonrake wrote:The size of the country. Irrelevant - given GR's ridiculous attempt to use it as an analogy. What's your point?
Get Real! wrote:Londonrake wrote:The size of the country. Irrelevant - given GR's ridiculous attempt to use it as an analogy. What's your point?
OK, so militarily there’s no difference between having to capture a rock of 100 inhabitants, versus capturing a country the size of Turkey with 46 million inhabitants!
GOT IT!
Londonrake wrote:Get Real! wrote:Londonrake wrote:The size of the country. Irrelevant - given GR's ridiculous attempt to use it as an analogy. What's your point?
OK, so militarily there’s no difference between having to capture a rock of 100 inhabitants, versus capturing a country the size of Turkey with 46 million inhabitants!
GOT IT!
And there's no difference between a "superpower" pouring 200,000 of its troops, with armour and air support, across a neighbouring country's land border, with having to travel 8000 miles by sea to undertake a military operation?
You brought it up but it's really not a valid comparison. And certainly absolutely nothing at all to do with current events in Ukraine. Which are in day 92. No?
So, come on, what's the good news for Russia today?
Return to Politics and Elections
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests