Kikapu wrote:Paphitis wrote:Kikapu wrote:Paphitis wrote:I do not believe that Russia defeating Ukraine is a foregone conclusion either. How they intend to occupy is beyond comprehension. I do not believe Russia has enough troops to occupy and secure the entire country, .
If Russia does invade Ukraine, it does not need to occupy the whole of the country, but just the Capital Kiev and the eastern half of the country. East Germany all over again!
They will still needs hundreds of thousands of troops to occupy Kiev and maintain a bridgehead.
I can’t see how Russia can do that year after year. Eventually, the Russians will be overcome. It will be a slow grinding down into hell, and eventual loss.
Russians won’t know or see their enemy.
Unlike East Germany, Russia would allow Ukrainians on the eastern half of Ukraine to be transplanted to the unoccupied western half, and allow Russia supporting Ukrainians to move to the Eastern half, and then just like Crimea, annex the eastern half of Ukraine through a “democratic” vote.
This is where Cypriots went wrong in 74.
I doubt Ukrainians will do the same. In addition to that, Ukrainians have a proud military history and a history of war such as WW2 where they were more or less on Germany’s side against Russia.
Back then it was a case of Russia’s enemy is our friend. So the hatred of Russia runs deep probably because Russia has had a long history of subjugating Ukraine.
Hence why Ukraine wants to join NATO and put an end to any possibility of Russia meddling in its affairs.
Ukraine has massive stockpiles of weapons and would easily be a worthy opponent to Russia on its own turf and are likely to fight on whilst under occupation either in whole or part.