Russian “intervention”?
As always, it hinges on the starting point.
Try here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_MemorandumWhat does any treaty Vladimir Putin’s a part of mean? Clearly, it’s worthless.
Moving on - try Putin’s 2014 annexation of Crimea, a part of the internationally recognised country of Ukraine (you know - that International law stuff you are so fond of quoting) Undertaken after the aforementioned Syrian demonstration by the Obama-twat of his clear reluctance to get involved in foreign entanglements. A good time to go for it Vlad.
Next - having gotten away with a mild wrist slapping by the west, and with a clearly senile Obama puppet moron in the WH - arming and supporting militants in the Russian speaking Ukrainian oblasts. Next “saving” them from Fascist Ukranian government abuse. For an earlier example search Hitler’s excuse for invading Poland. There’s nothing new under the sun. Apparently, from a recent post, Adolph had it right. Agree?
As far as Moldova and the Baltic states go, the above will serve as a perfect template. As always, enthusiastically supported by the usual social media useful idiots. Exercising their rights to unfettered freedom of speech. You couldn’t make it up.