repulsewarrior wrote:
...interesting; around twenty minutes, an opinion based on facts, rich with sound and images (sometimes too much of it imo), another take on Putin's motives, and his mission to that end.
The arguments are quite compelling.
Actually Warrior, the arguments are quite bullshit to say the least.
If Putin’s intentions on Ukraine and rest of Europe was as described by the presenter, then Russia would have gone into Ukraine with a million+ Army. He did not.
As far as the explanation on NATO for “not moving an inch further East“ was nothing but a semantical gymnastics, would be like saying Russia did not invade Ukraine but was in fact an invitation by Ukraine for Russia to be in Ukraine, which would be more factual in many levels starting with the Minsk accord of 2014 which was on paper between states and not just between politicians, than the broken promises on the expansion of NATO to the East. When dealing in bad faith, whether it is verbal or in written form, both are actionable legally and morally. Some go through the courts for justice and some take the law into their own hands to get justice!.
The man is equally a joke to Biden. If any of the 2 gets elected, then so be it, that's what the American sheep deserve.
