Kikapu wrote:You must be referring to this video, LR!...........................................
You're being pedantic - and obfuscating. I posted a short video (less than a minute - not 2.5 hours) involving an incident where a Russian armoured column was caught out in the open, trying to cross a river and came under Ukrainian artillery fire.
I - like you and just about everybody - had/have no idea how many were killed. Nevertheless the drone video of the aftermath clearly showed a veritable massacre had occurred. It wasn't some sort of Photoshop contrivance. My point is that posting anything like that is really a waste of time. Which is why I tend not to bother. You have on several occasions proven that view correct.
Again, you're being pedantic. A serious claim was made in here - let's not point fingers - that the Russians had lost only 600 in the 10 month battle for Bakhmut. Not too far fetched when viewed with Shoigu's that Russia's total casualties were about 6000. You yourself claimed on several occasions that Bakhmut was a clever Russian trap to draw Ukrainians into a "meat grinder". They are always clever Russian traps. Even the disasters.
Putin's avowed objectives, when he initiated the invasion of Ukraine, were to "denazify" and "demilitarise" the country and to stop the expansion of NATO.
The idea that Finland and Sweden joining NATO "means very little to Russia" is patently absurd. The former had been neutral since WW2 and the latter for over a century. Their joining is immensely important and reduces Putin's objective to a farcical joke. The Baltic has now become, like the Med, a veritable NATO lake. In a conflict, Russia's main fleet, based at Severomorsk, would be effectively bottled up. In wartime they wouldn't be able to get out of coastal waters without being subjected to attack. A situation, with Norway/Iceland/UK/US as members, which would prevail for hundreds of miles out into the Atlantic.
NATO's strength has increased hugely and it's border with Russia by over 800 miles. Here ended - in total disaster - Putin's objective of stopping the expansion of NATO.
The "Denazifying" thing is surely a joke? An evocative contrivance designed to enlist the Russian population's support for the invasion. Nazi regimes tend to be controlled by ruthless dictators, are highly nationalistic and expansionist. I'm sure any objective person would recognise who exactly is practicing Nazism here. Demilitarising hasn't really worked out very well either - has it?
None of these objectives can be achieved though by controlling parts of Ukraine. It needed to be the whole thing. Zelensky and Co had to be gotten rid of and a Lukashenko installed. There lies another Putin disaster.
Come back GR because with Pyrpo talking about the Russians nuking London and New York - which would be the end of it all of course - and you how, 18 months in, it's all going exactly to plan I really can't see any difference.