Robin Hood wrote:Londonrake wrote:RH
Re Ukr. Long, ranting POV. Not commensurate with events but riddled with your usual prejudices and bias confirmations. Your “facts”, often as not, anything but.
You’ve enthusiastically supported just about every dictatorial tyranny on the planet as long as I’ve known you. All of them having domestic police/security apparatuses that Stalin would approve of. Yet, when you hear of a potential change in CYPOL related legislation which could impact upon yourself you erupt into a fit of indignation.
I imagine you must be running out of ways of trying to make off-forum life difficult for me. Your last effort reached a new low though. Pathetic.
]I have always regarded you as a pompous, self opinionated, small minded, sarcastic individual and very heavily biased when it comes to Russia. But I never thought you were stupid ..... just brainwashed!
I have explained to you many of the points in the Ukraine conflict that you chose to ignore. I provide an indication of the source where you can check the facts for yourself, As you always have done, you claim anything that is contrary to your own views as being 'Russian propaganda' as your anti-Russian bias dictates your opinion. You disregard any inconvenient facts and believe that is indication of support for ".... just about every dictatorial tyranny on the planet" as opposed to me not supporting the very British views you hold. To me your heavy bias dictates every response you make.
Between the 10th and the 24th Feb 2022 the OSCE SMM in daily reports on Ukraine, showed events on the LoC n Donbas. OSCE is not Russian or a Russian biased group they were engaged by the 'western' side to monitor events in the region. What they recorded was a build up and then an invasion of Donbas to escalate the genocidal war against ethnic Ukraine Russian speakers. The Kyiv regime invaded Donbas, armed and supported by the US, around the 15th/16th Feb 22. That is a fact, a matter of record, irrefutable and [b]NOT propaganda. But it paints a different version of events that you would rather ignore than the ' unprovoked invasion of Ukraine by the Russians' you prefer as a description! I
That irrefutable evidence alone shows that it was the Kyiv regime that were the aggressors not Russia! Russia responded to Kyiv's aggression that started almost a full week before Russia responded to an RTP from the break away states.. You can't argue otherwise so you just ignore the FACT.
If the Von der Leyen proposal to investigate Russian Aggression AFTER they responded to an RTP from the Donbas States, then the enquiry is completely biased because it will not investigate any of the events I listed which explained the lead up to the Russian response. Which is why I question the start point of your time-line. IMO:THAT is a Kangaroo Court ....... not justice.I imagine you must be running out of ways of trying to make off-forum life difficult for me. Your last effort reached a new low though. Pathetic.
You are paranoid ! I don't have a clue about your latest accusations of some vendetta against you? I have nothing to do with you 'off forum' now .... I learned my lesson. At least, unlike you I don't threaten to work you over with the assistance of others, because of events within the forum, with threats like "We know where you live!". Do you still keep the filing cabinet full of 'evidence' you can give to your lawyer?
You are a bloody joke and need to grow up!
I second that but the issue is growing up is not possible. You do that by the age of 7 and your character and personality is formed. Sure you learn new things and expand your knowledge but your personality and character is set.