South Africa, Putin and his war crimes; problem solved.
https://chinasfuture.quora.com/South-Af ... inal-Court
Londonrake wrote:Like the Nord Stream incident. Will we ever actually know the real truth?
Pyrpolizer wrote:To learn the truth a)you need to use your own brain -if you have one- b)Be ready to accept the truth from people who never failed like Seymond Hersh and c) Stop hoping that the criminal will ever confess.
The truth about Nord Stream has already been revealed.
Londonrake wrote:If it was the Ukrainians though, the fact they can attack the Kremlin (another claimed "terrorist" incident I note) seems pretty damning. Not to mention humiliating.
Pyrpolizer wrote:Everybody can unsuccessfully attack with drones. All one needs is just launch them a few Kilometers away from the target. Would it be humiliating for the UK to get unsuccessfully attacked at 10 Downing Street?
CrookedRiverGuy wrote:Pyrpolizer wrote:who said it was a 700 km Flight????
Even if they launched it from the border to save 200, what difference does it make?
Point is, there's a zero chance that this is a genuine attack.
Londonrake wrote:Londonrake wrote:Like the Nord Stream incident. Will we ever actually know the real truth?
Hersh has had a long and remarkable career, with quite a few ultimately damning revelations. He isn't omnipotent though and it would be a mistake to treat everything he came out with as gospel. Nowadays he comes across to me as a fading diva, trying to recapture past glories.
Nonsense, he is very active doing investigating journalism on many issues. Go to his web site and see for yourself.
What happened re the Nord incident has not been definitively resolved. There are theories - each with its own "proof". Russia, the US and "pro-Ukrainian" groups have all been "fingered" but ultimately nothing has stuck. Even in the past week there's been another stab at it. A documentary about "Russian ghost ships" in the vicinity at the time. It comes down to nobody actually knows, (even Mr Hersch) it's all basically best guess.
A couple of further points on that.
Once again, an example of how you reject virtually all material originating from any western media outlet out-of-hand as "propaganda," whilst unquestioningly accepting it from the likes of Hersch. Because of course, he sings from the same hymn sheet.
How much more ignorant canyou be? Hersh is NOT Pro-Russian. You can't even spin your brain that the blow of Nord Stream couldn't possibly be done by a small group of people, and such a "secret" cannot remain sealed among a group of at least 40, assuming someone like Hersh goes after it. You can't even combine known facts as e.g. the fact that Sweden and others have already done their investigation and REFUSE to provide the results, other than saying it was a sabotage. Or other known facts like Biden's public declaration that they will destroy it. Or other ridiculous cover up stories, All made AFTER Hersh's story. The first one immediately after Scholtz visited Biden after the turmoil caused in Germany and so on and so on. Go on continue hiding behind the fact that the criminal has not confessed, and will never confess. You already failed on all 3 prerequisites. if there was a 4th one like d) Stop been a hypocrite, you would have failed on that one too.
Pyrpolizer wrote:How much more ignorant canyou be? Hersh is NOT Pro-Russian. You can't even spin your brain that the blow of Nord Stream couldn't possibly be done by a small group of people, and such a "secret" cannot remain sealed among a group of at least 40, assuming someone like Hersh goes after it. You can't even combine known facts as e.g. the fact that Sweden and others have already done their investigation and REFUSE to provide the results, other than saying it was a sabotage. Or other known facts like Biden's public declaration that they will destroy it. Or other ridiculous cover up stories, All made AFTER Hersh's story. The first one immediately after Scholtz visited Biden after the turmoil caused in Germany and so on and so on. Go on continue hiding. behind the fact that the criminal has not confessed, and will never confess. You already failed on all 3 prerequisites. if there was a 4th one like d) Stop been a hypocrite, you would have failed on that one too.
Pyrpolizer wrote:Londonrake wrote:Perhaps you don't realise, but you tend to deal in what comes across as attempted, intimidating bully boy stuff. Do you think it works?
Here we go again, another persona analysis. Give me an example to substantiate your claim.-->
Pyrpolizer wrote:You are always entitled to your opinion, just like myself when opining 100% in favor of Mother Russia.
Pyrpolizer wrote:Neeext!! ®
Londonrake wrote:Pyrpolizer wrote:Neeext!! ®
There is no "next". You've dealt with them all. Congratulations, mission accomplished.
Return to Politics and Elections
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests