Ohh dear.
Robin Hood wrote:You missed the point of the post. I was merely passing on a news story that you won't find in the BBC, SKY, Guardian, Telegraph etc.
Not at all.
You pointed out that Russian spy ships have been around for a long time. I agreed with you and added a bit about them from my own experiences. A bit of colour? Sadly lacking on this forum since the abrupt departure of GR(
)
Whilst the press refer to the vessel in question as a "spy" ship (sounds sexier) it isn't. It's task is primarily oceanographic survey/research. So, quite what it's been doing is anybody's guess. Given it's course and capabilities not really rocket science though.
You might be surprised to learn I did watch the section you suggested of the video you linked to. Clayton Morris is an interesting character with quite a chequered background but let's not shoot the messenger.
Not a single sentence of his is lacking in direction, prejudice and hyperbole. Objectivity is definitely not on the menu. It's the usual "independent" vitriolically anti-west stuff. Great looking, well animated website though. Loved the scrolling devoted zealots chat.
If you listen, other than parroting claims made by the Russian Defence Ministry (on April 10th actually) about the alleged attack on a Ukrainian bunker, he doesn't actually offer any evidence. It mainly rests on his repetitive claims that the proof somehow lies in the fact nobody else has reported it.
Oops, sorry, I'm forgetting. Apparently Zelenskyy appearing on TV
"looking like a beaten dog" constitutes collaborative evidence.
His "shocking" revelation of Doctrow (who?) supposedly being cut-off, because he'd gotten to the "interesting" bit was a non sequitur/straw man. The guy had sufficient time to make exactly and all (word for word actually) the same points Morris had about the supposed destruction of the bunker by a Khinzal missile.
And - yes - you're 100% right. You won't find anything about the event from most MSM sources in a search. Where you can it's mostly backwater and there just repetition of the Russian Defence Ministry's claim. An organisation which, as we all know, is famous for it's dedication to unbiased truth.
Seriously. Does anyone really believe (a dangerous question to ask around here
) that 300 high level Ukrainian officials and "dozens" of top NATO personnel were killed on 10th April in a Russian attack and almost 2 weeks later not a word of it has leaked out? Nothing from any of their families/friends/colleagues/nosey journalists? Sorry, but you really have to be a devoted Russian fan to accept that at face value. As ever, I'm open to being proved wrong.
Morris wheels out the usual suspects, Ritter and Macgregor. I watched that Ritter interview a while ago. It's been spliced in. Having listened in the past to him saying that the Russian Armed Forces have achieved one of the greatest victories in military history in Ukraine I filed him under "I" for Idiot. I can only think that he and Macgregor (both, like me, long past their military background best before dates), obviously like Clayton, are making a very nice living out of it. The fact they churn the stuff out freely, safely and unhindered from their comfortable homes in the States (Clayton in Portugal I believe), whilst a man in Russia has just been locked up for 25 years for daring to criticise the war, remains unspoken and suggests nothing in here regarding the differences between present-day Putin's Russia and the West. And the stuff their state controlled media feeds to the population daily doesn't piss you off of course.
So - enough for now?
Barring unforeseeable events this war's likely to go on for a considerable time I suspect. Personally, I'm hoping for an unforeseeable event.