Cyprus-Forum.com

[Get Real!]

Has there every been any doubt over who would "win"?

In that case, why does the criminal West not advise the Ukraine to surrender so as to save lives and infrastructure?

Hasn’t it become obvious to you that the prolongation of the conflict is seemingly the West’s only objective?

And what do we call this type of behavior?

Schadenfreude!

Can you at least agree to that?

[Paphitis]

Has there every been any doubt over who would "win"?

In that case, why does the criminal West not advise the Ukraine to surrender so as to save lives and infrastructure?

Hasn’t it become obvious to you that the prolongation of the conflict is seemingly the West’s only objective?

And what do we call this type of behavior?

Schadenfreude!

Can you at least agree to that?

Oh right!

So if China invades Australia, we must surrender to save our lives and infrastructure.

You've lost the plot!

We fight to the last man, and we will leave them no infrastructure at all.

So when Turkey invades Cyprus, Cypriots must surrender to save lives. Just like that. Hand over the country and surrender.

Ukraine will not surrender. Russia has a fight on its hands and Ukraine will fight to defend their country and freedom.

[Get Real!]

Oh right!

So if China invades Australia, we must surrender to save our lives and infrastructure.

You've lost the plot!

We fight to the last man, and we will leave them no infrastructure at all.

So when Turkey invades Cyprus, Cypriots must surrender to save lives. Just like that. Hand over the country and surrender.

Your dumb country of 26 million pompous vervet monkeys would be so deserving of a good wallop from either Russia or China… so it’s just as well you are sooooo far away and able to yap from a great distance!

Either of which would overrun you in a week.

[Paphitis]

Oh right!

So if China invades Australia, we must surrender to save our lives and infrastructure.

You've lost the plot!

We fight to the last man, and we will leave them no infrastructure at all.

So when Turkey invades Cyprus, Cypriots must surrender to save lives. Just like that. Hand over the country and surrender.

Your dumb country of 26 million pompous vervet monkeys would be so deserving of a good wallop from either Russia or China… so it’s just as well you are sooooo far away and able to yap from a great distance!

They are more than welcome to try, but as you can see already, Russia is in no position to invade Australia and get away with it, and they also don't have the balls.

They will die in our deserts.

Ukraine is too big for Russia. In Australia, they got no hope in hell.

[Get Real!]

They will die in our deserts.

They wouldn’t be going anywhere near the desert, you brainless Koala.

Given that Australia is just a total of 5 cities all around the coast it’s the perfect place for guided cruise missiles fired by a navy from 1,000 miles away, to completely devastate you with perfect accuracy.

[Paphitis]

They are more than welcome to try, but as you can see already, Russia is in no position to invade Australia and get away with it, and they also don't have the balls.

They will die in our deserts.

Don't be stupid little boy... you wouldn't last a week with either of them.

Don't kid yourself.

They can't even defeat Ukraine.

[Londonrake]

Ukraine has been invaded by over 100,000 Russian troops. Currently, their major cities are effectively under siege, with a decision clearly having now been taken to flatten them. Much like Grozny and Aleppo. In the fog of war the number of dead is a matter of conjecture. Given the scale of the conflict though it will be quite significant.

Yet - you talk about "the criminal west" and express contempt at the Ukrainians choosing to fight for their country. You perversely avoid the plain facts and - I find this mental contortion fascinating - act as though absolutely none of this is the fault of Russia at all. In fact, you sympathise with them. Certainly they have your full-blooded support. Plus, on several occasions you've shown a gleeful lust for this to escalate to the use of nuclear weapons.

On multiple forums, over many years, I've never come across somebody with a mind like yours. A rare treasure.

[Pyrpolizer]

Has there every been any doubt over who would "win"?

In that case, why does the criminal West not advise the Ukraine to surrender so as to save lives and infrastructure?

Hasn’t it become obvious to you that the prolongation of the conflict is seemingly the West’s only objective?

And what do we call this type of behavior?

Schadenfreude!

Can you at least agree to that?

Oh right!

So if China invades Australia, we must surrender to save our lives and infrastructure.

You've lost the plot!

We fight to the last man, and we will leave them no infrastructure at all.

So when Turkey invades Cyprus, Cypriots must surrender to save lives. Just like that. Hand over the country and surrender.

Ukraine will not surrender. Russia has a fight on its hands and Ukraine will fight to defend their country and freedom.

You fight of course but when there's no hope left, you just accept the terms. The Turks after taking 37% threatened us to stop firing at them or they would go ahead and take the whole of Cyprus. Clerides did exactly what they demanded. One year tater they threatened us once again about letting the remaining 60K of TCs (out of 120K) to flee to the North escorted by the UN. Clerides also accepted that.

Point is Ukraine is hopeless. The Russian terms is the absolute minimum they would ever expect. They better accept them the soonest possible or else I am afraid, there won't be any Ukrainians left in Ukraine. I suspect Russia's own mistake of thinking it would ever be possible to control 40 Million hostile Ukrainians after this war is going to be paid by the Ukrainians been ethnically cleansed and replaced by settlers.

[Get Real!]

Ukraine has been invaded by over 100,000 Russian troops. Currently, their major cities are effectively under siege, with a decision clearly having now been taken to flatten them. Much like Grozny and Aleppo. In the fog of war the number of dead is a matter of conjecture. Given the scale of the conflict though it will be quite significant.

Nobody cares how well the Ukrainians may or may not have fought… all that matters is the end result which only points in one direction.

They were dumb enough to waste many years of negotiating chances and opted to fight Russia so they can only blame themselves for their demise.

Yet - you talk about "the criminal west" and express contempt at the Ukrainians choosing to fight for their country. You perversely avoid the plain facts and - I find this mental contortion fascinating - act as though absolutely none of this is the fault of Russia at all. In fact, you sympathise with them. Certainly they have your full-blooded support. Plus, on several occasions you've shown a gleeful lust for this to escalate to the use of nuclear weapons.

Rejecting any further NATO bases on their doorstep is a legit Russian concern which I wholeheartedly agree with.

On multiple forums, over many years, I've never come across somebody with a mind like yours. A rare treasure.

Thanks.

[Pyrpolizer]

And another thing:
There's a lot of propaganda going on, and I really expected the CF members to use their own logic to work out some easy stuff.
There have been 3 agreements so far, to cease fire in certain areas creating a safe corridor for civilians escorted by the Red Cross to evacuate some seized cities. All 3 so far failed, and the Western media accused the Russians for not abiding to the cease fire.

Spin up your brains guys. Could it ever be the fault of Russia? Russia WANTS the civilians to get out to minimize human live losses after she unleashes a full scale attack. Ukrainian forces DON'T want the civilians to leave, because knowing Russia's current Kid-glove approach, they need the civilians as a human shield.
So who violated the agreements the Russians or the Ukrainians? Like I said use your brains...