Lordo wrote:Why are you so simple. What it is at issue is how much does the employer pay to the worker in terms of percentage of what they produce. This is why i asked you to work out what the workers are paid for what they produce. I know because I did it for 10 years before I found my feet to start my first business. I got paid less than 10% of what I produced personally. I agree that there are others that need to be paid in the process so it is a matter of balance. Directors other top people get 10s of millions. That is the issue but you do not seem to understand what is said.
It is not just that you have to produce more than 20 pounds, the issue is how much more. That is in the heart of the problem. Distribution of wealth.
Everywhere it's the same thing. The top guys making huge money.
However it's not only the top guys who might be rotten. From my experience there are a lot of employees who are equally rotten. I can give you many examples, from the low paid to the highly paid.
Good thing is nothing lasts for ever. The average successful company lives for 30 years. Amazon, Google,Ebay etc will be gone one day.
Of course your point is that while a company and it's CEOs thrive their lower paid employees should get decent salaries.
This however assumes that both the CEOs and the employees are honest.
In my experience both CEOs and employees are equally rotten. In fact you may find more rotten employees among the ones working at minimum salary than among others.
Capitalism/free markets work as they should. From there on it's a matter of social support from Governments. Humans are not saints and never will be. There's no magic recipe to eradicate poverty.