repulsewarrior wrote:Paphitis wrote:Lordo wrote:What we have currently is not sustainable. There is a better way of using resources as well as working less hour n a week and be just as productive. Just because this is how we have been doing things so far does not mean it has to continue this way. Every so often situation changes and adjustments are made. Those days where we gained a skill at uni and we used it all our lives is over. We need to re-skill when ever necessary.
It can be done and there does not have to be any suffering for anybody.
You are all pushing into wind.
Car pollution only accounts for 19% of CO2 emissions. And cars are becoming more efficient so that is in decline.
It’s industry that is the big polluter. Like fossil fuel electricity generation, and manufacturing.
...small modular reactors; they are coming soon.
As for cars, if you have the yard for it, having several is best; no single "car" suits all purposes. You can still make the commitment to ride a bike, and walk. You can make a commitment to use your car(s) less too.
Stop kidding yourselves. A reactor no matter how small or large has the same problem. The radioactive waste has to be deisposed and it is very expensive. The reason why they have been built is because the government assured the corporations that they will take the responsibility of disposal after decomissioning,
So we are paying for the electricity twice.
There is only one sustainable future and that is using nature without damaging it.
There is plenty of ways of doing this even without new technology. Mankind eventually comes up with combining existing technologies to create a new supply.
Here is a lovely example.
Egyptian man used steam power in his barber shop and a few hundred years later a Syrian man built a traack to pull his horse draw wagons for his crops. Sixteen hundred od years later the Steam engin and the railways were created.