Cyprus-Forum.com

[Londonrake]

Or the actions of the authorities in the way they attacked the mourners. But of course as soon as one criticize then one is accused of being anti-semitic.

Not true really. From what I've seen condemnation seems pretty widespread across the - shit news - western MSM.

Still think HMS Belfast should turn its guns on the nearest Jewish quarter, in response to the ridiculous accusations of the Labour Party's EHRC investigation conclusion?

There's a clue of what it was all about in that.

[Lordo]

In the meantime, I wait for the first UN resolution that criticizes Israel.

Perhaps this Jewish intellectual can explain it to you.

Anybody who lied and joined in accusing the most decent politician in the country.

I love the way he says, "it is true people will blame those jews who spearheaded the attack". Gues where they live?

Credit where credit is due.

[Lordo]

This is a very interesting development today.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-61447105

A spokesperson for the NUS, which says it represents seven million students, said it was disappointed the universities minister had put the news in a press release rather than speak to it directly.

Considering there are 7 million members in the Union, I wonder how many complaints there were that it had to be aired as it was. I bet there was less than 100. Now that is some statistic considering there is about 8% anti-sedentism in the country.

So you can see how it works right?

Going back to the Labour Party investigation and the way the only other party investigated by them was the fascists, I don't suppose it makes any difference to you that:
1. They found Corbyn guilty of interfering twice and both banning members who were being investigated before concluding
2. The very person who sat on the files and delayed the investigation to cause problems for Corbyn was known Blairite who was named in the report none other than the cunt called Cunt Mathews.

[Londonrake]

IIRC, can't really be assed to revisit it. In 1994, when 800,000 Rwandan Tutsis were massacred in 100 days by Hutus the UN said very little and actually did fuck all.

In the same year the UNGA raised 19 ant-Israeli resolutions. That pretty much sums up the organisation in my view. Given the abject dismissal of their vote on the Russian invasion of Ukraine that seems to be in line with how others feel in here. No?

Going back to the Labour Party investigation and the way the only other party investigated by them was the fascists, I don't suppose it makes any difference to you that:
1. They found Corbyn guilty of interfering twice and both banning members who were being investigated before concluding
2. The very person who sat on the files and delayed the investigation to cause problems for Corbyn was known Blairite who was named in the report none other than the cunt called Cunt Mathews.

Corbyn was a disastrous choice as Labour leader. Only made possible by Red Ed Milliband's rule changes. Which enabled any twat to get a vote on the Labour leadership for the price of a cheese sandwich, even in the middle of the contest. The total dork's own MPs voted overwhelmingly to get rid of him. To no avail (they clearly and correctly knew what they were trying to do). Such is the lunatic situation with the leadership rules that even after Labour's evisceration in 2019 if Corbyn had stood again for the leadership he would have been voted in with a huge majority.

Corbyn got the worst result for the Labour party in almost a century because he was patently a total cunt. Frankly, anti-semitism had little to fuck all to do with the matter. He's gone. Sad as it may be you need to come to terms with that, just like Brexit. Move on.

[Lordo]

IIRC, can't really be assed to revisit it. In 1994, when 800,000 Rwandan Tutsis were massacred in 100 days by Hutus the UN said very little and actually did fuck all.

In the same year the UNGA raised 19 ant-Israeli resolutions. That pretty much sums up the organisation in my view. Given the abject dismissal of their vote on the Russian invasion of Ukraine that seems to be in line with how others feel in here. No?

Going back to the Labour Party investigation and the way the only other party investigated by them was the fascists, I don't suppose it makes any difference to you that:
1. They found Corbyn guilty of interfering twice and both banning members who were being investigated before concluding
2. The very person who sat on the files and delayed the investigation to cause problems for Corbyn was known Blairite who was named in the report none other than the cunt called Cunt Mathews.

Corbyn was a disastrous choice as Labour leader. Only made possible by Red Ed Milliband's rule changes. Which enabled any twat to get a vote on the Labour leadership for the price of a cheese sandwich, even in the middle of the contest. The total dork's own MPs voted overwhelmingly to get rid of him. To no avail (they clearly and correctly knew what they were trying to do). Such is the lunatic situation with the leadership rules that even after Labour's evisceration in 2019 if Corbyn had stood again for the leadership he would have been voted in with a huge majority.

Corbyn got the worst result for the Labour party in almost a century because he was patently a total cunt. Frankly, anti-semitism had little to fuck all to do with the matter. He's gone. Sad as it may be you need to come to terms with that, just like Brexit. Move on.

Regarding the Labour vote, how very interesting.

Here are some results fo the lLbour votes of the past. See how many votes Blair lost and also see who got the lowest vote. You are just parrot fashioning the shit media. Note how Blair and Brown lost 5 million votes. You do post some crap stuff.

Labour votes
1997 13,518,167
2001 10,724,953
2005 9,552,436
2010 8,609,527
2015 9,347,273
2017 12,878,460
2019 10,265,912

The worst hey? Right of course. Like fuck. Like I said you should have just had a look what happened in the background to stop Corbyn winning.

[Lordo]

IIRC, can't really be assed to revisit it. In 1994, when 800,000 Rwandan Tutsis were massacred in 100 days by Hutus the UN said very little and actually did fuck all.

In the same year the UNGA raised 19 ant-Israeli resolutions. That pretty much sums up the organisation in my view. Given the abject dismissal of their vote on the Russian invasion of Ukraine that seems to be in line with how others feel in here. No?

Going back to the Labour Party investigation and the way the only other party investigated by them was the fascists, I don't suppose it makes any difference to you that:
1. They found Corbyn guilty of interfering twice and both banning members who were being investigated before concluding
2. The very person who sat on the files and delayed the investigation to cause problems for Corbyn was known Blairite who was named in the report none other than the cunt called Cunt Mathews.

Corbyn was a disastrous choice as Labour leader. Only made possible by Red Ed Milliband's rule changes. Which enabled any twat to get a vote on the Labour leadership for the price of a cheese sandwich, even in the middle of the contest. The total dork's own MPs voted overwhelmingly to get rid of him. To no avail (they clearly and correctly knew what they were trying to do). Such is the lunatic situation with the leadership rules that even after Labour's evisceration in 2019 if Corbyn had stood again for the leadership he would have been voted in with a huge majority.

Corbyn got the worst result for the Labour party in almost a century because he was patently a total cunt. Frankly, anti-semitism had little to fuck all to do with the matter. He's gone. Sad as it may be you need to come to terms with that, just like Brexit. Move on.

How many of these resolutions were passed by the 5 UN Permanent members of Security Council again? Like fuck they did.

[Londonrake]

IIRC, can't really be assed to revisit it. In 1994, when 800,000 Rwandan Tutsis were massacred in 100 days by Hutus the UN said very little and actually did fuck all.

In the same year the UNGA raised 19 ant-Israeli resolutions. That pretty much sums up the organisation in my view. Given the abject dismissal of their vote on the Russian invasion of Ukraine that seems to be in line with how others feel in here. No?

Going back to the Labour Party investigation and the way the only other party investigated by them was the fascists, I don't suppose it makes any difference to you that:
1. They found Corbyn guilty of interfering twice and both banning members who were being investigated before concluding
2. The very person who sat on the files and delayed the investigation to cause problems for Corbyn was known Blairite who was named in the report none other than the cunt called Cunt Mathews.

Corbyn was a disastrous choice as Labour leader. Only made possible by Red Ed Milliband's rule changes. Which enabled any twat to get a vote on the Labour leadership for the price of a cheese sandwich, even in the middle of the contest. The total dork's own MPs voted overwhelmingly to get rid of him. To no avail (they clearly and correctly knew what they were trying to do). Such is the lunatic situation with the leadership rules that even after Labour's evisceration in 2019 if Corbyn had stood again for the leadership he would have been voted in with a huge majority.

Corbyn got the worst result for the Labour party in almost a century because he was patently a total cunt. Frankly, anti-semitism had little to fuck all to do with the matter. He's gone. Sad as it may be you need to come to terms with that, just like Brexit. Move on.

How many of these resolutions were passed by the 5 UN Permanent members of Security Council again? Like fuck they did.

You're missing the point(s).

[Lordo]

IIRC, can't really be assed to revisit it. In 1994, when 800,000 Rwandan Tutsis were massacred in 100 days by Hutus the UN said very little and actually did fuck all.

In the same year the UNGA raised 19 ant-Israeli resolutions. That pretty much sums up the organisation in my view. Given the abject dismissal of their vote on the Russian invasion of Ukraine that seems to be in line with how others feel in here. No?

Going back to the Labour Party investigation and the way the only other party investigated by them was the fascists, I don't suppose it makes any difference to you that:
1. They found Corbyn guilty of interfering twice and both banning members who were being investigated before concluding
2. The very person who sat on the files and delayed the investigation to cause problems for Corbyn was known Blairite who was named in the report none other than the cunt called Cunt Mathews.

Corbyn was a disastrous choice as Labour leader. Only made possible by Red Ed Milliband's rule changes. Which enabled any twat to get a vote on the Labour leadership for the price of a cheese sandwich, even in the middle of the contest. The total dork's own MPs voted overwhelmingly to get rid of him. To no avail (they clearly and correctly knew what they were trying to do). Such is the lunatic situation with the leadership rules that even after Labour's evisceration in 2019 if Corbyn had stood again for the leadership he would have been voted in with a huge majority.

Corbyn got the worst result for the Labour party in almost a century because he was patently a total cunt. Frankly, anti-semitism had little to fuck all to do with the matter. He's gone. Sad as it may be you need to come to terms with that, just like Brexit. Move on.

How many of these resolutions were passed by the 5 UN Permanent members of Security Council again? Like fuck they did.

You're missing the point(s).

On the contrary, just tell me how many resolutions did the 5 permanent members of the UNSC pass against Israel. The make up of the UN is made up such that power lies with the big 5. This is the reason not a single resolution can pass where it matters as Russia will veto it and probably China too.

More to the point, have you got the point?

[repulsewarrior]

...good news in a counter intuitive way.

Israel must deal with "Them", the Problem, too.

[repulsewarrior]

...and so the betrayal seems that much clearer.

https://www.ekathimerini.com/in-depth/1 ... -unheeded/

...months before the coup, and the Turkish invasion, Turkey was already mobilizing for it.