It made some 23 million in box office so it didn't need much of a push..
It dropped Du pont's shares by 10% within 7 days!
I wonder how long the effect lasted though.
Pyrpolizer wrote:It made some 23 million in box office so it didn't need much of a push..
It dropped Du pont's shares by 10% within 7 days!
I wonder how long the effect lasted though.
Pyrpolizer wrote:btw the movie was based on research published 3 years earlier in NY times magazine.
Du Pond and 3M had already paid millions in lawsuits and settlements let aside the drop of their shares.
Lordo wrote:Pyrpolizer wrote:btw the movie was based on research published 3 years earlier in NY times magazine.
Du Pond and 3M had already paid millions in lawsuits and settlements let aside the drop of their shares.
But less than one year's profit right? I call that a slap on the wrist rather than punishment.
Pyrpolizer wrote:Lordo wrote:Pyrpolizer wrote:btw the movie was based on research published 3 years earlier in NY times magazine.
Du Pond and 3M had already paid millions in lawsuits and settlements let aside the drop of their shares.
But less than one year's profit right? I call that a slap on the wrist rather than punishment.
Here are Duponts stats
https://www.statista.com/statistics/540 ... of-dupont/
If you sum up the loss in value of shares, and the damages they paid it's much more.
How many thousands of farmers and factories pollute Danube river in Germany along it's route making it the sewage tank it is today? How much each one of those pay for damages?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests