Cyprus-Forum.com

by **repulsewarrior** » Sat Sep 16, 2023 11:46 pm

..this one made me laugh.

Unlike the "Russians", Indians see things quite differently; on the map that "China" uses.

by **Lordo** » Sun Sep 17, 2023 12:19 am

repulsewarrior wrote:

..this one made me laugh.

Unlike the "Russians", Indians see things quite differently; on the map that "China" uses.

The Swine have also occupied East Turkmenistan too.

by **Londonrake** » Sun Sep 17, 2023 8:51 am

Lordo wrote:The Swine have also occupied East Turkmenistan too.

Which Swine?

In the past you’ve insisted you use the slur to describe the UK Conservative Party. Those who thought differently apparently “couldn’t understand English” (like you do :lol:

)

Since, you’ve used it on so many different occasions, covering countless situations, that as a descriptive one the term has in essence become meaningless. :eyecrazy:

So, enlighten. In this particular case which occupying “Swine” are you talking about?

by **Lordo** » Sun Sep 17, 2023 9:16 pm

We are making progress, so long as one recognises in UK we have the TorySwine, it is only a small step to further understand who else is a Swine in the world.

Rather than losing it's meaning it ties it down like the old Cypriots tied their goats down with a Balloudji.

Every time I see a post of a swine, this springs to mind.

by **Londonrake** » Mon Sep 18, 2023 6:46 am

Lordo wrote:We are making progress, so long as one recognises in UK we have the TorySwine, it is only a small step to further understand who else is a Swine in the world.

That’s just obfuscating bullshit.

You said: “The Swine have also occupied East Turkmenistan too”

Question:

Which “Swine”?

by **repulsewarrior** » Mon Sep 18, 2023 7:37 am

Londonrake wrote:
Lordo wrote:We are making progress, so long as one recognises in UK we have the TorySwine, it is only a small step to further understand who else is a Swine in the world.

That’s just obfuscating bullshit.

You said: “The Swine have also occupied East Turkmenistan too”

Question:

Which “Swine”?

...me too, it left me wondering exactly which swine you're talking about.

by **Lordo** » Mon Sep 18, 2023 11:34 am

RW Swine is a conservative in any country. A conservative just in case you are not aware is cunt that would sell his mother if there was a buck in it for him. They don't care for anybody but themselves and their donors and they may extend the care bit to their core voters. Like Fishy said, he changed the rules about public spending so not so much go to the poor but more is given to boroughs like Tunbridge Wells which is one of the richest places in Swineland.

In the case mentioned above it is the Chinese who took East Turkmenistan.

by **Londonrake** » Mon Sep 18, 2023 7:17 pm

More BS. Followed by:

Lordo wrote:In the case mentioned above it is the Chinese who took East Turkmenistan.

What really happened here?

You did what you so often do. Came out with a knee-jerk, provocative post on a subject which you'd absolutely no idea about. It doesn't matter how many times you're pulled up on that, you just can't help yourself.

Once challenged you were in a self made trap. This time - unlike your "what a fuckin cunt" response to my tongue in cheek "end of days" jibe - without even being able to cobble together some total crap, ass-covering comeback.

When pushed, rather than admit that you were wrong (the history of the E Turkmenistan is of course one involving occupation and conflict between Russia, China and the indigenous people, divided along cultural/religious lines) you tried to blag your way out with total bullshit.

You would no more call the Chinese "Swine" than your own mother a whore. Like all bleedin' heart, hypocritical socialists you've nothing but admiration for the like of the CCP and just about every totalitarian regime on the planet.

Your "Swine" - Jeez who isn't sick to the back teeth of hearing that? - are the West, who as you now know (having been forced to actually look it up) have never occupied the country.