Pyrpolizer wrote:Paphitis wrote:Pyro, you have absolutely no clue.
You have no idea what these RIO and BHP contracts involve. For all we know, they were probably already paid for before the ships even left Australia. These companies didn't come down in yesterday's shower. You don't know what clauses they have.
The clueless one is actually YOU. Go ask a Bank what an irrevocable and confirmed Letter of Credit is, and when exactly that ICLC is not valid anymore. Go ask the procedure by which payment is effected. Go ask what documents should pass through the Bank from the captain of the ship, the ports authority, and the customs clearance, to actually effect the payment. You have no idea, you think the payments are done the way of buying a whopper with cheese at McDonalds. Enough of your fantasy trips, I already got bored
Secondly, Australia has been doing very well.....
.... Warning: An essay follows.....
Read enough nonsense already
Oh I know what a confirmed letter of credit is don't you worry about that and I also have experience giving credit on 30, 60 and 90 day terms. Well it's really 30 day terms but things bought at the beginning of the month, don't have to be paid till the last business day of the following month which is a credit term of 55 to 60 days. And usually, to apply credit to a debtor, the debtor's directors must sign a Guarantee, allowing the creditor an avenue to take collection action on their assets in the event of default or non-compliance with the terms of the contract. RIO TINTO and BHP will not dump anything without payment unless they have enforceable guarantees which is very unlikely in a country like China.
You however have no clue how oil and resource companies operate across international borders. You do not know anything about their contracts or whether they are paid in advance or not.
These resource companies probably will not dump tens of millions of dollars of product into a foreign country in the midst of a trade war without having some guarantees of payment.