Cyprus-Forum.com

[Lordo]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-politics-64868158
I don't believe the Swine actually believe what they say but they think they will fool the base into believing it and voting for them.

1. Refugees coning in on the small boats are all from countries where they are unable to apply to come here
2. They have already said that 80% of them are genuine and 20% are not.
3. They will pass a law that will allow Cruella to send all of them away without even considering their application and they will lose the right to ever applying again.

and get this asshole thinks that's fair.

Cruella's claims this will stretch the boundaries of International law. Like hell it will. We are about to break international law. But of course they tried this a year ago and it is still in the courts.

[Lordo]

He is tough as nails our Fishy Swine and likes to pick a fight with 15 year old girls and poor people in small boats who are unable to fight and are at the end of their tether.

He is very good ad fighting them.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-64881908

[Lordo]

You cannot make it up.

Emmanuel Macron is poised to throw out Rishi Sunak's plan to return small boats to France, ahead of a meeting between the two leaders this weekend. The Prime Minister will travel to Paris tomorrow for the Anglo-French summit, in which they will discuss small boats, Brexit and defence.

It is thought Mr Sunak hopes to secure a long-term deal with the EU country to return illegal immigrants who cross the English Channel.

In return, Britain would accept refugees from the EU.

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/travel/news/here-we-go-again-macron-to-spark-fresh-uk-france-row-by-rejecting-small-boat-return-plan/ar-AA18p1Xd?ocid=entnewsntp&cvid=46957401ec4a4506a53843dd4b4acfff&ei=15
Why would the French accept the boat people back, when they take three times as many refugees as we do. But the idea that we will accept EU refugees in return, what the hell does this mean. Fuckin Fishy prefers blonds to dark skin people. I did not realise there were EU refugees in Europe.

What the fuck is going in in his fuckin tiny brain?

[Lordo]

Anyway, another day another dollar. We look forward to some fair trials

Apparently our Gazza has been a naughty boy again.

Lineker reacted to it on Twitter calling it an "immeasurably cruel policy directed at the most vulnerable people in language that is not dissimilar to that used by Germany in the 30s".

How dare he speak about an injustice.

Interestingly both Wrightey and Shears have join him and are refusing to appear too.

Of course it is not political biased when they pack the audience with Swine in question time or switch news reports order to help the government.
To hell with the Bullshisenhousens and the Swine. In some ways I do feel sorry for them, they cannot help losing their humanity after the bullshit they have been fed for all their lives, it is of no surprise to me they have grown into mushrooms.

There is nothing like a voice telling you about oppressions and the cause people seek life elsewhere, Real Anatolian life today and has been it seems forever naturally with the full help of the Swine.


Incredibly released in year 1997.

[Lordo]

Bullshitters incorporate are at it again.

The BBC have reportedly decided to not broadcast an episode of David Attenborough's new series over fears it would spark a backlash from Tory politicians and the rightwing press.

The new series on British wildlife will not be shown as it fears themes of the destruction of nature would risk a backlash.

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/entertainment/tv/bbc-decide-to-not-broadcast-david-attenborough-episode-over-rightwing-backlash-fears/ar-AA18sNHM?ocid=entnewsntp&cvid=2a7e1f37ee1b43648e0a55d97b77d90a&ei=17

Lost for words. Who was that iriot who said we do not live in a democracy for cryin out loud.

[Londonrake]

Lost for words.

That’ll be the day.

[Kikapu]

Bullshitters incorporate are at it again.

The BBC have reportedly decided to not broadcast an episode of David Attenborough's new series over fears it would spark a backlash from Tory politicians and the rightwing press.

The new series on British wildlife will not be shown as it fears themes of the destruction of nature would risk a backlash.

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/entertainment/tv/bbc-decide-to-not-broadcast-david-attenborough-episode-over-rightwing-backlash-fears/ar-AA18sNHM?ocid=entnewsntp&cvid=2a7e1f37ee1b43648e0a55d97b77d90a&ei=17

Lost for words. Who was that iriot who said we do not live in a democracy for cryin out loud.

It gets worse with the BBC (British Broadcasting Cunts) in denying Gary Lineker in his personal life to have free speech in his criticism of the government policy on the immigrants arriving on small boats to the UK. BBC claims that Lineker has crossed the impartiality line as an employee of the BBC, and yet, these cunts propagate the propaganda on Ukraine war by taking sides which crosses all impartiality lines. BBC once upon a time was an trusted iconic news outlet where everything they said was believed. They are now no different than other cuntish propaganda “news” outlets.

[Londonrake]

Given your scathing view of the "British Broadcasting Cunts", or "British Bullshit Corporation" as Lordo's often called it, I'm sure a man like you won't be hypocritically linking to their articles, in order to support your posts, half a dozen times a week. Because that's exactly what Mr L does.

[Lordo]

My word since when has it been hypocritical to post an organisations reports because one oppses them.

There are people on this forum who do not understand debating or democracy.

Stop attacking posters and start posting your thoughts if you think I or anybody else is wrong in what they have posted or just better still fuck off.

Last night in question time program it was mentioned that it is wrong to offer BoZo's dad a knighthood as it has been established that he broke his wifes nose and she ended up in hospital in the past. Fiona Swine who is a patron of a charity which helps abused women tried to belittle daddy BoZo action as not being so serious.

Bullshitting corporation is riddled with Swines and admittedly they have pulled the wool over the public's eyes since it was established.

They will ride this one out too. They will continue to feed the public with bullshit. How else are they going to turn the public into mushrooms.

Onward and upward as it were.

[Londonrake]

My word since when has it been hypocritical to post an organisations reports because one oppses them.

There are people on this forum who do not understand debating or democracy.

Stop attacking posters and start posting your thoughts if you think I or anybody else is wrong in what they have posted or just better still fuck off.

To repeatedly criticise a news organisation - of whatever ilk - but then use it to support your views is exactly that. Rank hypocrisy. The reason of course is you're lazy and it's easier just linking to the British Bullshit Corporation's articles. You clearly often can't even be bothered to read what's in your own links, let alone others.

What debates?

You've advocated executing those with political views you disapprove of, not forgetting IIRC a few kind words about Hitler in his early days, then resort to the tired, boring old cliché that anybody who disagrees with you is a Fascist. Without the faintest inkling of the irony.

You talk critically about people being treated according to the colour of their skin, then repeatedly refer to a country of 70 million as "Swineland" and its population "Swine". Gormlessly unaware of the hypocrisy. Please, spare me the BS that it's a misunderstanding and all about one political party. You've done it far too many times. That, sunshine, is why I have a tendency to "attack" you.

Anyway, you should be pleased that you've gotten some responses on "Your" thread I'd have thought. Doesn't happen that often.