Cyprus-Forum.com

[Robin Hood]

Quote LORDO: In case there are some out there who are wondering why I do not type a lot of text, I need to explain that that's the way I am. I do that in all my work too. In fact my agent calls me "the most succinct person on earth".

But the problem with that is that you cannot have a proper discussion with just a SINGLE FACT! You need many facts to strengthen the argument. That Is why I find your posts difficult to turn into dialogue.

My view is why post two words when one will do the job just as good. Dealing with 10 things is not my style, I like to deal with points one by one. In one face to face debate one adversary refused to debate with me for that reason. He realised I would take his every point apart one by one. From then on he never discussed anything with me. And of course he was a Zionist and we were talking about Israel.

But, try going into Court with a single piece of evidence that destroys the Prosecution case completely and beyond any reasonable doubt ! You will lose ..... guaranteed! In every Court case the existence of proven facts is undeniable and cannot be contested but, once the Lawyers apply the hypothesis of LAW they can alter the context of the FACTS. It is an illusion that the LAW ensures JUSTICE ...... it does just the opposite which is why those with lots of money usually win Court actions.

This is what certain members on this and other forums do ........ LR calls it 'whataboutery' and it is usually a case of 'whataboutery' is OK for them when the hypothesis of their 'law' is applied ...... but not for others.

[Lordo]

Quote LORDO: In case there are some out there who are wondering why I do not type a lot of text, I need to explain that that's the way I am. I do that in all my work too. In fact my agent calls me "the most succinct person on earth".

But the problem with that is that you cannot have a proper discussion with just a SINGLE FACT! You need many facts to strengthen the argument. That Is why I find your posts difficult to turn into dialogue.

My view is why post two words when one will do the job just as good. Dealing with 10 things is not my style, I like to deal with points one by one. In one face to face debate one adversary refused to debate with me for that reason. He realised I would take his every point apart one by one. From then on he never discussed anything with me. And of course he was a Zionist and we were talking about Israel.

But, try going into Court with a single piece of evidence that destroys the Prosecution case completely and beyond any reasonable doubt ! You will lose ..... guaranteed! In every Court case the existence of proven facts is undeniable and cannot be contested but, once the Lawyers apply the hypothesis of LAW they can alter the context of the FACTS. It is an illusion that the LAW ensures JUSTICE ...... it does just the opposite which is why those with lots of money usually win Court actions.

This is what certain members on this and other forums do ........ LR calls it 'whataboutery' and it is usually a case of 'whataboutery' is OK for them when the hypothesis of their 'law' is applied ...... but not for others.

No RH, in a court of law you can present all the evidence you like but you still have to present them one by one to the jury and allow the defence to challenge them one by one. and allow rebuttal too.

It's ok if you do not wish to join because in any case most of what I post is events and what people say. So there really is not that much discussion to be had. Unless the information is incorrect.

[Lordo]

This is new. Clearly Rochdale result has bamboozled him.

What is interesting is the fact that the Swine Party got 12% and Starmer's withdrawn candidate got 7.7%. And the Tiny Fishy interprets that as "extremists undermining democracy". Clearly he is not aware how extreme the Swine Party has been since Milk Snatcher came to power.

May they all rot in hell.

Rishi Sunak has claimed extremist groups in the UK are “trying to tear us apart”, in a hastily arranged Downing Street statement that came hours after George Galloway won a byelection in Rochdale.

Standing outside Downing Street late on Friday, the prime minister condemned what he called “a shocking increase in extremist disruption and criminality” after the 7 October massacre by Hamas and the Israeli invasion of Gaza.

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/extremists-trying-to-tear-us-apart-says-rishi-sunak-in-impromptu-no-10-speech/ar-BB1jbCR4?ocid=entnewsntp&pc=U531&cvid=5fc98b51d92441df97cffd3a77425b65&ei=17

[Lordo]

What is really interesting is why Little Fishy decided to take out the lectern outside No 10 Downing St and and make a statement telling us:

Rishi Sunak Addressed The Nation Outside No.10 – And Said Very Little

Naturally as he is like the size of a 13 years old boy and dresses like it too and acts like it. And then he went on:

Rishi Sunak has used a “lectern speech” outside the doors of No.10 Downing Street to condemn extremists “trying to tear us apart” – but offered little by way of a policy solution.

Westminster was buzzing as the prime minister announced he would make an unexpected Friday night address – with the prospect he was about to call a general election swiftly ruled out.
Instead, Sunak’s addressed the nation on tackling the unrest in Britain in the aftermath of the October 7 attacks by Hamas against Israel – a situation the PM had likened to “mob rule” in a statement earlier in the week.

Against the backdrop of the No.10 front door, Sunak warned “our democracy itself is a target” for extremists.

This is normally when something very important has happened. Reserved for when the election is won or announcing the date of the election or some other very important matter. Everybody assumed he was going to announce the election date.

What the hell did he expect when he ignores a million people marching and what exactly did they do. A few people protested outside the surgery of a Swine MP and painted it read for voting against ceasefire. He just does not see that the extreme has been this government from 2010 a d still moving more extreme by the day.

What shook both Little Fishy and Starmer is result in Rochdale. They were not expecting to come 3rd and 4th.

This may well be the day the camel back was broken. I look forward to Galloway performing in parliament and TV shows assuming they have the balls to invite him.

This is not just about the Muslim vote, this is about decency and humanity. How can they vote against ceasefire while children are being slaughtered. But last few days Zionists excelled in their action, they actually pretended to deliver food to the starving and then started shooting them as well as run them over with their tanks.

The world just sits back and watches, This is nothing new. Churchill was fully aware what the Nazis were doing in concentration camps and decided to ignore it.

[Lordo]

At last somebody with some Character, and have the balls to say it how it is. It's time to grow the Workers party who will represent the working class.

Listen to Galloway's speech.


and this one about his reaction to the speech outside no 10.


I shall say what Galloway wanted to say but did not on account of him being an MP. The Prime Minister can go fuck himself.

[Lordo]

Learn about what he is about?

[Londonrake]

This is what certain members on this and other forums do ........ LR calls it 'whataboutery' and it is usually a case of 'whataboutery' is OK for them when the hypothesis of their 'law' is applied ...... but not for others.

Ohh, come on.

For a start it's "Whataboutism". As in:

"The technique or practice of responding to an accusation or difficult question by making a counter-accusation or raising a different issue."

Difficult to get a person's head around I appreciate. Perhaps a reasonable recent example is how in the "Ukraine Issue" thread you tried to turn it to talking about events in Libya of 13 years ago. Nothing to do with the thread at all but................... what about?

As for law, well................... like banking and - for that matter - most subjects you post on, you're the indisputable expert.

[cyprusgrump]

At last somebody with some Character, and have the balls to say it how it is. It's time to grow the Workers party who will represent the working class.

Just one tiny problem Bordo, he represents the Working Class of Gaza, not his constituency.

And quite frankly, you can go and fuck yourself too...

[Lordo]

Interesting new development the SwineCunts have developed recently. They have no evidence to prosecute a refugee so they wait for them to leave the country and revoke their passports so they cannot return. If they are indeed criminals why not put them in front of the judge? Cause there ain't no crime right?

Now that's what I call a fair trial.

I know it will upset my SwineCunt friends but hey I don't make this shit up. This shit is made up for the mushrooms cause they just looooooooooooooooove bullshit.

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/home-office-stripping-suspected-crime-lords-of-british-citizenship-to-ban-from-the-uk/ar-BB1jdYh3?ocid=entnewsntp&pc=U531&cvid=07a639a101454f3e8b1d6cdd1859b3b0&ei=12

[Londonrake]

At last somebody with some Character, and have the balls to say it how it is. It's time to grow the Workers party who will represent the working class.

Just one tiny problem Bordo, he represents the Working Class of Gaza, not his constituency.

And quite frankly, you can go and fuck yourself too...

Galloway's certainly quite a character. He's always seemed to me an opportunist though. Prone to changing his colours to suit. At one point - for example - he was an ardent Remainer in the Referendum campaign. Next a full-on Brexiteer.

Politically he's been adept at spotting niche opportunities, cashing in on and stoking up Muslim voters anger at the various ME conflicts. Whilst that worked in the likes of Bradford and now Rochdale, when he's tried his luck in less sectarian constituencies the results have tended to be abysmal.

He's come out as a fervent supporter of Bashir Assad. A man with the blood of tens of thousands of his own people on his hands and the refugeeing of millions but has adopted an outraged, righteous position on the likes of Israel and Saudi Arabia.

For quite a few I don't think he's ever recovered from the film of his barf inducing kowtowing to Saddam Hussein.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IIy_GmvUElE

Sorry Lordo, I can't by any stretch of the imagination see Galloway as the great Socialist/Islamist (what's the difference nowadays?) hope for the twat league future.

So the great - deeply passionate - Socialists now regard the likes of Vladimir Putin and Hamas as allies? Well, fuck me, what a funny ole world.